Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Radar technology that allows police to 'see' inside homes raises fresh concerns from judges, etc.
The London Daily Mail ^ | January 19, 2015 | David McCormack

Posted on 01/19/2015 8:58:11 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

* At least 50 U.S. law enforcement agencies now have access to radar devices that enable them to effectively see into people's homes
* The technology has been available for more than two years, but only come to light during a federal appeals court hearing in Denver last month
* The use of the technology adds to growing concerns about government surveillance and also raises legal and privacy issues

At least 50 U.S. law enforcement agencies now have access to radar devices that enable them to effectively see into people’s homes and determine if anyone is inside.

Although the FBI, U.S. Marshals Service and others have had the technology for more than two years, it only come to light during a federal appeals court hearing in Denver last month.

During the case it emerged that officers had used the Range-R device before they entered a house to arrest a man wanted for violating his parole.

The judges in the case expressed alarm that agents had used the technology without a search warrant in line with the U.S. Supreme Court's advice.

‘The government's warrantless use of such a powerful tool to search inside homes poses grave Fourth Amendment questions,’ said the judges....

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: 4th; 4thamendment; donutwatch; fascism; lawenforcement; police; radar; yeswescan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet
'The government's warrantless use of such a powerful tool to search inside homes poses grave Fourth Amendment questions,' said the judges...

The judicial branch always somberly says crap like this— just before they once again rule in favor of the inexorable expansion State power. It's all for the the benefit of We the People, of course.

I guess the phony hand-wringing and feigned concern & deliberation is intended to convince We the People that the inevitable decision to further obliterate Fourth Amendment protections was oh-so-painfully anguished over, before the regrettably necessary Tyranny was fomented as usual.

Drop by drop by drop, inch by inch by inch: it never ends, and it always goes in the direction— less Freedom.

Funny how it always works out that way, isn't it?

At this point, who are they trying to fool?

"A Republic, if we can keep it", indeed!

21 posted on 01/19/2015 10:43:12 PM PST by sargon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
During the case it emerged that officers had used the Range-R device before they entered a house to arrest a man wanted for violating his parole.

Nonsense. They're looking through walls. How are they going to know which person they're snooping on?

No sir, I don't like it...

22 posted on 01/19/2015 10:47:20 PM PST by sargon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

Another aspect that does not lead to criminal prosecution is the blackmail aspect of it. Knowing who is having an affair with whom and holding that info is a huge deal.

DK


23 posted on 01/19/2015 10:59:49 PM PST by Dark Knight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

If you’re not doing anything wrong, what are you worried about? /s


24 posted on 01/19/2015 11:05:06 PM PST by Veggie Todd (The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. TJ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dark Knight

Yes, that’s another angle I was thinking of working into the story. That would be how the intelligence agencies gained control of all the politicians, since they could make or break any of them with the dirty laundry they knew.


25 posted on 01/19/2015 11:05:17 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: sargon

“How are they going to know which person they’re snooping on?”

I imagine that would actually be fairly simple, nowadays, though probably not for local police.

You could use the instruments to record someone when they are outside of the home, so you know who it is, then analyze that data and find a “thermal signature”. If the instrument is sensitive enough, everyone’s body must emit some slightly unique pattern, that a computer could map and then track with pattern recognition.


26 posted on 01/19/2015 11:10:25 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
I have aluminum siding and fiberglass batting with aluminum foil on one side. It's going to be a boring view. It does help keep my WiFi inside pretty effectively.
27 posted on 01/19/2015 11:27:55 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

There are a dozen jokes just layin there

lol


28 posted on 01/19/2015 11:28:21 PM PST by advertising guy ( Muslims, another white meat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Myrddin

There’s interior paint now that keeps WiFi inside a dwelling.


29 posted on 01/19/2015 11:34:55 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (The question isn't who is going to let me; it's who is going to stop me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: doorgunner69

It wasn’t for a “baby monitor” it was for a SWAT team pre-entry recce to determine where in a room humans are.


30 posted on 01/20/2015 1:17:00 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

You know? That might be a “selling” point for a house with lead based paint! :0)


31 posted on 01/20/2015 1:18:04 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

There is more concern to this than just about respecting our Constitutional rights, which obviously the government and police do not. What about health? This device is sending electronic signal / radiation into the target home to see what is there. And strong enough to penetrate multiple walls varying thickness and composition. This isn’t the simple scanners at the airport that have already been removed for, among other reasons, safety concerns. The unknowning residents are being irradiated and some percentage will get cancer and die. Killed by the government.


32 posted on 01/20/2015 1:34:47 AM PST by Reno89519 (For every illegal or H1B with a job, there's an American without one. Muslim = Nazi = Evil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Article the fourth... The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

The 4th Amendment is absolutely clear. FedGov needs a warrant based on probable cause to use this. Otherwise, this device is as big a danger to free people as illegal aliens (including the at least culturally foreign invader in our White House), drug dealers, ISIS, and America's other enemies.

33 posted on 01/20/2015 5:17:05 AM PST by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Solution: lead lined drywall for your exterior walls, just like the kind they use in dentist offices.


34 posted on 01/20/2015 5:20:15 AM PST by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

Doing some config work on my Mac last night, I noticed that the list of wireless networks available - other than the usual ones, included one called FBI Surveillance Van ...


35 posted on 01/20/2015 7:28:07 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy

Hmmm... I have that in my roof...


36 posted on 01/20/2015 7:29:20 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sargon

If the police have the legal authority to enter the home, I can see the courts supporting the use of this equipment for safety purposes.

The courts won’t allow them to use it for fishing expeditions, though. They’ll need a search warrant.


37 posted on 01/20/2015 7:41:52 AM PST by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: LucyT; azishot

Even if a warrant is required, one can’t trust this regime and its appointed communist judges.

Maybe the police should use this technology to find out how many Islamists are gathering in the white hive.


38 posted on 01/20/2015 7:52:23 AM PST by melancholy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

Just call it Minority Report and be done. ;)


39 posted on 01/20/2015 7:59:10 AM PST by Ghost of SVR4 (So many are so hopelessly dependent on the government that they will fight to protect it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PIF
...other than the usual ones, included one called FBI Surveillance Van ...

lol...I named my wifi that as well..

40 posted on 01/20/2015 8:01:53 AM PST by Ghost of SVR4 (So many are so hopelessly dependent on the government that they will fight to protect it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson