The Boehner for speaker whip count [14 against so far]

Washington Post ^ | January 5, 2015 | By Aaron Blake

[Jim Robinson]

~~snip~~

Voting against Boehner (10)

Gohmert*

Yoho*

Rep. Steve King (Iowa)

Rep. Jim Bridenstine (Okla.)*

Rep. Dave Brat (Va.) (freshman)

Rep. Walter Jones (N.C.)*

Rep. Gary Palmer (Ala.) (freshman)

Rep. Thomas Massie (Ky.)*

Rep. Paul Gosar (Ariz.)

Rep. Marlin Stutzman (Ind.)

Said prior to 2014 election that they would vote against Boehner (2)

Rep. Jody Hice (Ga.) (freshman)

Rep. John Ratfliffe (Tex.) (freshman)

Voted against Boehner in 2013/haven't weighed in (2)

Rep. Steve Pearce (N.M.) (spokesman says he's "undecided")

Rep. Justin Amash (Mich.)

Voted against Boehner in 2013/will support him (3)

Rep. Mick Mulvaney (S.C.)

Rep. Raul Labrador (Idaho)

Rep. Tim Huelskamp (Kan.)**

[Finny]

You vote to turn the Republican party left.

Can't you handle that truth? Why not?

[what's up]

Because I pointed out that Scalise is a nonstory (as many Freepers have pointed out...he never spoke to a white supremacist group) you think I'm in the pay of the GOP?

You really better catch up on what's going on.

[what's up]

I’m done.

Excellent.

However, you've said that before and then always end up pinging me again.

[Norm Lenhart]

Because I like tormenting liberals and getting others to realize what you are.

And I have enjoyed great success doing it. Several have thanked me in fact. Know why? Because every time I tell people to read your post history, some do. And not one ever found my statements about you to be in error. Not one.

Choke on it lib.

[Norm Lenhart]

Wasnt a non story was it? Nope. It was in all the papers and TV. Thats a story by definition.

[what's up]

Fake story is a non story. The liberals make up stuff and call it a story, but when all the facts are wrong it's a nonstory.

But you seem to have bought it hook, line and sinker.

[what's up]

Because every time I tell people to read your post history, some do

So what? In the case you posted, people will see that I said Scalise did not speak to a white supremacist group. And I was right. Big deal. An investigative genius you are not.

BTW...I see you stalk others on the FR forum. As FlagLady says...it IS creepy.

[Norm Lenhart]

Shes an unimpeachable source...of the problem. As are you. Choke on it lib. Your post history is what it is and Jim was wise to not allow editing. Because you cant hide your liberalism, your GOP sycophancy or your altered realities.

[ObamahatesPACoal]

I told Senate Conservatives and Madison Project to target her instead of wasting time on the open primary states. I think the Paulbot got 30% against her.

Boehner, Lynn Jenkins and McSally(Arizona) only got under 70% against unfunded opponents.

Scalise, McCarthy and McMorris wont lose. They have non partisan primary system. Of course primary Boehner again.

[what's up]

Your post history is what it is

True...I was correct that Scalise did nothing wrong.

[Norm Lenhart]

The fact you see nothing wrong with GOP Pols with Klanner friends who organize the events they speak at pretty much marks you as what you are. An idiot.

At minimum.

That can’t read.

[what's up]

So here you are spewing your lies again. And didn't you say you were "done" pinging me?

Yet another lie.

[Norm Lenhart]

I didnt ping you. I replied to you. And you didn’t show a lie. Just lied to claim it.

BTW I thought you fellow travelers of Stormfront got purged. I mean you DO say theres nothing wrong here and so do they...Why are you two in agreement? I have to ask why? Is there something you are not disclosing? Because most of the political right disagrees with you about it.

Liar.

[what's up]

I didnt ping you. I replied to you.

Exactly. And that conflicts with your multiple claims that you were "done with me". Why don't you follow thru with that promise?

Because most of the political right disagrees with you about it.

Actually the left...John Lewis and Salon for example disagree with me. I'm comfortable with that.

Here's Salon trying to keep it alive right along with you:

http://www.salon.com/2015/01/06/how_i_busted_steve_scalise_inside_a_gop_political_scandal_and_its_ongoing_coverup/

Meanwhile, I am in agreement with that bastion of liberalism (/s), Human Events, who remarks that the liberal media has backed off completely because they were wrong. But you just keep parroting the liberals.

http://humanevents.com/2014/12/31/media-um-that-big-steve-scalise-story-probably-didnt-happen/

You are a joke. And I'm glad others on this board have recognized your lack of credibility. Not to mention downright creepiness at times.

[Norm Lenhart]

So why are you in agreement with Stormfront? You ducked that. Fraud. SSDD. Diversion, lie and excuse. Typical Whats’ Up posting pattern.

And I thank God daily that flaglady and her ilk hate me. So keep doing that.

[what's up]

I don't even know or care what Stormfront is.

Meanwhile you're in agreement with John Lewis. Got it.

Now, why don't you do what you said you were going to do and be "done with me"?

[Norm Lenhart]

So you post about things you know nothing of. Perfect liberal.

[what's up]

So you post about things you know nothing of

How's that? I already posted 2 links which prove I do know something of the facts of the matter while you parrot John Lewis.

So what are you basing this new lie on now?

[Norm Lenhart]

your lLast post moron. You typed why.

[what's up]

What in the world are you talking about?

I have read up on the topic and know quite a bit. Do you know anything? I assume not since you are saying exactly what Lewis is saying. Since he's an idiot, well, that doesn't say much for you does it?