Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nanny State: Sprinkles To Be Banned By FDA
Investor's Business Daily ^ | December 30, 2014 | IBD EDITORIALS

Posted on 12/30/2014 9:51:02 AM PST by raptor22

Regulation: Cures for cancer and Ebola having been found, the federal ubernannies have decreed that sprinkles should no longer adorn kids' ice cream because they contain the trans fat that liberal groups once pushed for.

Come the New Year, the Food and Drug Administration, ignoring the principle that in most cases it's the dose that defines the poison, will issue new regulations designed to remove even trace amounts of hydrogenate oils, commonly known as trans fats, from our diets.

Trans fats have been in our foods since the 1950s to increase shelf life and improve taste. A small amount appears naturally in some foods, but research has determined that large quantities of trans fats in one's diet can be dangerous for long-term health.

But so can large quantities of bacon, and no one has proposed banning bacon, at least not yet, but we're sure that thought has occurred to those who want 16-ounce soft drinks banned while forcing our children to eat cardboard school lunches.

Each American consumes a mere 1.3 grams of trans fats per day. That's roughly 0.6% of our total daily calories, and no research suggests that this poses a health risk. But that's not enough to dissuade the federal nannies from regulating even the most minute aspect of our daily lives.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.investors.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: biggulps; dictator; dictatorship; fda; foodnazis; foodpolice; govtabuse; ibd; nannystate; obama; smokingbans; sodaban; sprinkles; transfats; tyranny; waronsprinkles
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last
To: Little Ray

[The Donuts of Doom!]

Apparently there are those who want to “punish” opulent Americans by giving them their just desserts - gruel and water.


21 posted on 12/30/2014 11:03:13 AM PST by stars & stripes forever (Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

Sorry, but the reality is, had science been where it is today when Transfat was created it would have NEVER been allowed into the food industry, the stuff is beyond toxic, and we are going to see a whole lot of folks in their 30s and 40s today dropping dead of heart disease because it was not only allowed in, but sadly pushed as a replacement for saturated fats in the late 80s and 90s.

This stuff, man made transfat, should be completely banned from use in food production and preparation. This isn’t some global warming nonsense, this is clear, experimentally proven and repeatable fact. Trans Fat is poison and should not be a food additive, or be used in food preparation.

Making this ban a “nanny state” argument is just flat out hogwash.


22 posted on 12/30/2014 11:10:52 AM PST by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

Wait, wasn’t this posted as satire yesterday?


23 posted on 12/30/2014 11:12:36 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor22
Not even Soviet Russia thought to be this oppressive.

If this keeps up, I will start calling for America's collapse.

24 posted on 12/30/2014 11:14:42 AM PST by Lazamataz ("Two parties, governing AGAINST the will of the people, not with the consent of the governed." --MrB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

I have lived strictly on transfat, ONLY, no fruits and vegetables or meats. I am the picture of health. TAKE YOUR NANNY STATE SOMEWHERE ELSE.


25 posted on 12/30/2014 11:16:17 AM PST by Lazamataz ("Two parties, governing AGAINST the will of the people, not with the consent of the governed." --MrB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

1) I highly doubt your claim and 2) if you feel you are healthy, after such a life, get back to us in a decade or two.

The science on this is not in debate, the stuff is toxic, this isn’t some “the majority of scientists agree” type claim, the stuff is poison. Just because its slow acting does not mean its not toxic.

To spin this as nanny statism is just moronic... You know you can drink water from 100% lead pipes your entire life as well and “be the picture” of health until the concentrations in your body get to the point where you literally go mad because your neurological system can no longer properly function, but so what, its nanny state that lead isn’t allowed to be used for water pipes or in food preparation, lets teach those nanny staters and remove that ban... what do they know.

Seriously, ignorance is not your friend.


26 posted on 12/30/2014 11:25:24 AM PST by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

Ahhh the good ol’ days. Butter was terrible for you. Coconut oil was absolutely evil and the worst thing ever. Then good ol’ margerine saved us all from an agonizing death of clogged arteries. Plastic bags would stop the deforestation of old growth forests. Oops, now margerine is the worst thing ever and butter is all natural organic and coconut oil is sold by huge tubs in health food stores and placed in all natural organic paper bags.


27 posted on 12/30/2014 11:30:04 AM PST by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB

I remember seeing it as well had the (semi-satire/semi-news) tag on it as I recall.


28 posted on 12/30/2014 11:38:46 AM PST by reed13k (For evil to triumph it is only necessary for good men to do nothings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

Another IBD ‘partial story’.

This is about banning PHO’s. Most sprinkles do not have PHO’s.


29 posted on 12/30/2014 11:39:08 AM PST by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

We call them “sprills”


30 posted on 12/30/2014 11:39:21 AM PST by P.O.E. (Pray for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay
The science on this is not in debate, the stuff is toxic

Where have I heard that "the science is settled" stuff before?

Oh yeah! Global warming!

Show your evidence please.

31 posted on 12/30/2014 11:41:40 AM PST by Lazamataz ("Two parties, governing AGAINST the will of the people, not with the consent of the governed." --MrB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

The amount of sprinkles is trivial. Government has no right to do this.


32 posted on 12/30/2014 12:09:17 PM PST by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible. Complicit in the destruction of this country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

Science is based on statistics. That means that while something may have measurable harmful effects for some, many or even most people it is extremely rare that it is toxic for all people.

The “nanny state” takes some and treats it as though it is “all” because it does not view us as individuals but rather as statistics.

Hope that helps.


33 posted on 12/30/2014 12:23:53 PM PST by cgbg (HLM--"Democracy is the theory that people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: reed13k

Annie Sprinkle has been Banned???
What is this world coming to?


34 posted on 12/30/2014 12:25:41 PM PST by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom

But we’ve ceded that principle. Many happily. You absolutely cannot give the Government the power to ban “A” and then get upset when they move on to “B”, “C”, and “D”.
The paradigm under which we operate is if that somebody can make the case that something is “bad”, then Government can step in. That’s the ball we’ve put into play, no sense getting upset when someobody takes a swing at it.


35 posted on 12/30/2014 12:36:04 PM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Nachum; markomalley; Clairity; Carlucci; grey_whiskers; meyer; WL-law; Para-Ord.45; ...

NANNY STATE PING


36 posted on 12/30/2014 2:20:04 PM PST by raptor22 (Follow me on Twitter @gerfingerpoken or facebook.com/danielsobieski)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tomato lover

It’s almost impossible to by “real” lard. Butchers used to sell it but now they don’t even know what it is!


37 posted on 12/30/2014 2:50:54 PM PST by miss marmelstein (Richard the Third: Loyalty Binds Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein

I buy the same lard my grandma used, only now it’s packaged like a pound of butter.


38 posted on 12/30/2014 2:52:45 PM PST by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves Month")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: raptor22; 11B40; A Balrog of Morgoth; A message; ACelt; Aeronaut; AFPhys; AlexW; alrea; ...

Don’t Sprinkles When You Tinkles Nanny State PING!


39 posted on 12/30/2014 2:53:37 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (The mods stole my tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER

That Hormel stuff?


40 posted on 12/30/2014 2:53:57 PM PST by miss marmelstein (Richard the Third: Loyalty Binds Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson