Posted on 12/16/2014 3:23:43 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
As an unapologetic Tea Partier, an unreformed right-winger, I resent being lumped into the same column with the moral and intellectual geldings of the establishment GOP. Many of my fellow Republicans are either too lazy or intellectually dishonest to differentiate a conservative from a Republican. Sometimes, depending on the individual, the two are one and the same. Most of the time, unfortunately, the two are mutually exclusive.
Take GOP House Speaker John Boehner please.
The recent budget battle added clarity to the political war being fought in America. And that war is raging on the fringes of our civil society. While John Boehner the poster child for the GOPs gooey, marshmallowy majority worked with the White House to pass a measure funding the federal government through September, GOP Senator Ted Cruz put forward a point of order measure that forced his Senate Republicans to vote on the constitutionality of President Obamas executive action on amnesty for millions of illegal aliens.
It allows Republicans to show they are committed to ending Obamas amnesty once and for all in the next Congress, Cruz told the press. If we agree it is indeed unconstitutional, we have no business funding it when the GOP controls Congress.
Nearly half the Senates Republicans joined Harry Reids Democrats to defeat Cruzs measure and eventually pass Boehner and Obamas $1.1 trillion Obamacare-amnesty-funding omnibus budget, which included incoming GOP Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.
But Cruz accomplished something very important in Washingtons confused, upside-down world: Clarity.
Criticism of Cruz usually centers on this type of grandstanding at the expense of colleagues. But he also has a propensity to vote no on every piece of major legislation that involves any compromise for the hard right, wrote Jennifer Rubin, who the Washington Post passes off as the reasoned voice of conservatism the Boehner-McConnell, forever-compromising, branch of conservatism.
Cruzs grandstanding at the expense of colleagues proves that a majority of congressional Republicans are more likely to support the policies of Barack Obama than those of, say, Ronald Reagan.
Cruz gets under the skin of the GOP leadership and the media because with one procedural stroke, he obliterates the fiction that the GOP is a conservative party.
His [Cruzs] idea of conservatism is standing with [the conservative base of the GOP], making a statement, rather than, I think the conventional idea is, doing something, said Washington Post columnist and Fox News contributor Charles Krauthammer. Now, there was no way in which the objection he raised over the weekend was going to do anything, anything at all, to stop the presidents executive order.
Krauthammer completely misses the point. Forcing people to take a stand exposes: a) what they really believe; or b) what their political contributors have paid them to believe.
The result is clarity.
John Boehner, Mitch McConnell, Jennifer Rubin and Charles Krauthammer hate clarity. It separates the wheat from the chaff, the feeble fake from the genuine article. Cruz proved that establishment Republicans are a new breed of conservative, one more interested in conserving the dangerous status quo than the freedom of the individual against the unconstitutional expansion of state power.
On the far left, meanwhile, Democratic Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren is a rising star among the totalitarian base of her party. No Democrat speaks as passionately and as effectively about issues related to income inequality, lack of functional governance, and the declining American middle class as Warren does, wrote Scott Conroy at Real Clear Politics. And during a campaign season [midterm elections] in which Democrats had little to get excited about, her fist-pumping, high-decibel, populist harangues got crowds fired up wherever she went.
Warrens full-throated opposition to the omnibus budget nearly led to a government shutdown. She apposed the GOP rider eliminating a provision of the Dodd-Frank financial reform law prohibiting banks from investing in risky derivatives with guaranteed taxpayer bail-outs should their investments tank.
Warren also distanced herself from President Obama by criticizing his nomination of Wall Street banker Antonio Weiss to become the administrations Under Secretary for Domestic Finance.
The over-representation of Wall Street banks in senior government positions sends a bad message, said Warren. It tells people that one and only one point of view will dominate economic policymaking. It tells people that whatever goes wrong in this economy, the Wall Street banks will be protected first Sure, big banks are important, but running this economy for American families is a lot more important.
Warren undercuts her own argument by admitting that its the government, not a free people, running this economy. It was a democratically-controlled Congress that created the government-sponsored enterprises Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to purchase mortgages underwritten by the banks, which operate under the sway of that other government-sponsored enterprise the Federal Reserve.
It was a Democratic Congress that enacted legislation forcing government-regulated banks to issue sub-prime loans to bad credit risks. Subprime lending, at its essence, was a fast-track income redistribution scheme. The government geniuses running this economy assumed that real estate values would never fall. That fast-rising home equity would raise the net worth of subprime borrowers.
Warrens protestations to the contrary, the geniuses running this economy, a.k.a., the government, had no choice but to bail-out banks that were effectively nationalized in 2008 by the government geniuses running this economy.
Warrens brand of populism is bipartisan and got us in the mess we find ourselves today. If Warrens populism continues at its current pace, income equality will resemble that of Cuba, where misery is a commodity shared by all.
President Obama, John Boehner, Mitch McConnell and Elizabeth Warren are unified by one ideal: that government must be the lash-wielding master of American civil society. Their only quibble is over who gets to crack the whip, who gets to be the policymaker.
The Tea Party unsettles Democrats, Republicans and non-committed Independents because they challenge the comfortable but dangerous fantasies of the status quo.
Tea Party favorite Senator Ted Cruz continually undermines the fiction that there exists a functioning GOP opposition to American decline. He underscores the need for the Tea Party to double its efforts to transform the Republican Party into a principled organization dedicated to the restoration of the American Republic.
The people never give up their liberties but under some delusion, said Edmund Burke.
So, thank you Senator Ted Cruz for providing much needed clarity.
Where are all the RINO lovers who said we MUST reelect McConnell and Cochran?
For that matter, the Cruz haters are strangely absent.
Oh yeah, they’re mostly the same posters!
bkmk
Working as a speech writer for Mondale can do that to a person...
Oh yeah! You’re right!
Didn't he just apologize?
Exactly! He’s all words! No action, just puffed up words written and/or spoken with a haughty condescending attitude to boot.
While the basis of Ted Cruz's CRomnibus speech is against the funding of Amnesty in the budget bill, a lesson in politics begins at about 11 minutes. This is a 36 minute explanation of how our bills are passed that many people dont seem to understand.
In the speech you hear Senator Cruz referring to Madame President and may wonder why. On this day, for political positioning Elizabeth Warren was given the leaders chair. At the end Elizabeth Warren, the democrat presidential hopeful is dumbfounded by what was just presented and in her confusion she does what Barack Obama does pushes the motion on to someone else that will be in charge later.
Shine the light on then TED!!!
.
.
If Mr. Boehner has no problem in lying to God, he sure will never have a problem lying to us.
I wouldn't go that far but I too am very disappointed in Krauthammer after his incredibly stupid comment about Cruz helping Harry Reid with the confirmations. In the interview, Cruz explained that all of these people were going to get confirmed this week anyway. So maybe the confirmations came a day earlier. This is a big deal? I think not.
And, amazingly, today when he was given the chance to correct the record on this sorry Cruz falling into a Harry Reid Trap theory he doubled down on it.
Bye bye Charles. You have lost a lot of fans here at FR.
Every conservative will soon face the final challenge - abandon your principles or abandon the GOP. My choice is made.
If Jeb Bush wins the nomination.. I will write in Cruz..
I am just waiting for Cruz to announce to get off my duff and help him win the primary.
GREAT Article. BTTT!
While John Boehner the poster child for the GOPs gooey, marshmallowy majority
...
The GOPe wants Big Government, graft, and is waging war against conservatives who are against what they want. There is nothing GOOEY about it.
The GOPe who went down in flames with Romney, Father of RomneyCare/ObamaCare, blamed the four million conservatives who did not vote for his loss. There will be many millions more conservatives not voting in ‘16 if they stick us with Jeb or Christie. They will lose again because there aren’t enough White millionaires to vote secular Republican, where only their fat wallet issues matter.
Yes , Baier did look a bit uncomfortable , but he asked good questions and allowed Cruz all the time he needed to explain his positions . Cruz hit it out of the park . I imagine Brett got a lot of emails regarding last nights show . I give him credit for giving equal time to Cruz .
Bkmk.
I sent him an email last night. I hope many more did too.
It’s going to be hard to watch the constant free publicity for Jeb on FOX.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.