Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The bothersome clarity of Senator Ted Cruz
Communities Digital News ^ | December 16, 2014 | Stephen Z. Nemo

Posted on 12/16/2014 3:23:43 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

As an unapologetic Tea Partier, an unreformed right-winger, I resent being lumped into the same column with the moral and intellectual geldings of the establishment GOP. Many of my fellow Republicans are either too lazy – or intellectually dishonest – to differentiate a conservative from a Republican. Sometimes, depending on the individual, the two are one and the same. Most of the time, unfortunately, the two are mutually exclusive.

Take GOP House Speaker John Boehner… please.

The recent budget battle added clarity to the political war being fought in America. And that war is raging on the fringes of our civil society. While John Boehner – the poster child for the GOP’s gooey, marshmallowy majority – worked with the White House to pass a measure funding the federal government through September, GOP Senator Ted Cruz put forward a “point of order” measure that forced his Senate Republicans to vote on the constitutionality of President Obama’s executive action on amnesty for millions of illegal aliens.

“It allows Republicans to… show they are committed to ending Obama’s amnesty once and for all in the next Congress,” Cruz told the press. “If we agree it is indeed unconstitutional, we have no business funding it when the GOP controls Congress.”

Nearly half the Senate’s Republicans joined Harry Reid’s Democrats to defeat Cruz’s measure and eventually pass Boehner and Obama’s $1.1 trillion Obamacare-amnesty-funding omnibus budget, which included incoming GOP Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.

But Cruz accomplished something very important in Washington’s confused, upside-down world: Clarity.

“Criticism of Cruz usually centers on this type of grandstanding at the expense of colleagues. But he also has a propensity to vote no on every piece of major legislation that involves any compromise for the hard right,” wrote Jennifer Rubin, who the Washington Post passes off as the reasoned voice of “conservatism” – the Boehner-McConnell, forever-compromising, branch of conservatism.

Cruz’s “grandstanding at the expense of colleagues” proves that a majority of congressional Republicans are more likely to support the policies of Barack Obama than those of, say, Ronald Reagan.

Cruz gets under the skin of the GOP leadership and the media because with one procedural stroke, he obliterates the fiction that the GOP is a “conservative” party.

“His [Cruz’s] idea of conservatism is standing with [the conservative base of the GOP], making a statement, rather than, I think the conventional idea is, doing something,” said Washington Post columnist and Fox News contributor Charles Krauthammer. “Now, there was no way in which the objection he raised over the weekend was going to do anything, anything at all, to stop the president’s executive order.”

Krauthammer completely misses the point. Forcing people to take a stand exposes: a) what they really believe; or b) what their political contributors have paid them to believe.

The result is clarity.

John Boehner, Mitch McConnell, Jennifer Rubin and Charles Krauthammer hate clarity. It separates the wheat from the chaff, the feeble fake from the genuine article. Cruz proved that establishment Republicans are a new breed of conservative, one more interested in conserving the dangerous status quo than the freedom of the individual against the unconstitutional expansion of state power.

On the far left, meanwhile, Democratic Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren is a rising star among the totalitarian base of her party. “No Democrat speaks as passionately and as effectively about issues related to income inequality, lack of functional governance, and the declining American middle class as Warren does,” wrote Scott Conroy at Real Clear Politics. “And during a campaign season [midterm elections] in which Democrats had little to get excited about, her fist-pumping, high-decibel, populist harangues got crowds fired up wherever she went.”

Warren’s full-throated opposition to the omnibus budget nearly led to a government shutdown. She apposed the GOP rider eliminating a provision of the Dodd-Frank financial reform law prohibiting banks from investing in risky derivatives with guaranteed taxpayer bail-outs should their investments tank.

Warren also distanced herself from President Obama by criticizing his nomination of Wall Street banker Antonio Weiss to become the administration’s Under Secretary for Domestic Finance.

“The over-representation of Wall Street banks in senior government positions sends a bad message,” said Warren. “It tells people that one – and only one – point of view will dominate economic policymaking. It tells people that whatever goes wrong in this economy, the Wall Street banks will be protected first… Sure, big banks are important, but running this economy for American families is a lot more important.”

Warren undercuts her own argument by admitting that it’s the government, not a free people, “running this economy.” It was a democratically-controlled Congress that created the government-sponsored enterprises Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to purchase mortgages underwritten by the banks, which operate under the sway of that other government-sponsored enterprise – the Federal Reserve.

It was a Democratic Congress that enacted legislation forcing government-regulated banks to issue sub-prime loans to bad credit risks. Subprime lending, at its essence, was a fast-track income redistribution scheme. The government geniuses “running this economy” assumed that real estate values would never fall. That fast-rising home equity would raise the net worth of subprime borrowers.

Warren’s protestations to the contrary, the geniuses “running this economy,” a.k.a., the government, had no choice but to bail-out banks that were effectively nationalized in 2008 by the government geniuses “running this economy.”

Warren’s brand of “populism” is bipartisan and got us in the mess we find ourselves today. If Warren’s populism continues at its current pace, income equality will resemble that of Cuba, where misery is a commodity shared by all.

President Obama, John Boehner, Mitch McConnell and Elizabeth Warren are unified by one ideal: that government must be the lash-wielding master of American civil society. Their only quibble is over who gets to crack the whip, who gets to be the “policymaker.”

The Tea Party unsettles Democrats, Republicans and non-committed Independents because they challenge the comfortable but dangerous fantasies of the status quo.

Tea Party favorite Senator Ted Cruz continually undermines the fiction that there exists a functioning GOP opposition to American decline. He underscores the need for the Tea Party to double its efforts to transform the Republican Party into a principled organization dedicated to the restoration of the American Republic.

“The people never give up their liberties but under some delusion,” said Edmund Burke.

So, thank you Senator Ted Cruz for providing much needed clarity.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; US: Massachusetts; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 2016election; amnesty; cromnibus; doddfrank; election2016; elizabethwarren; fauxahontas; lieawatha; massachusetts; tedcruz; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet

Where are all the RINO lovers who said we MUST reelect McConnell and Cochran?

For that matter, the Cruz haters are strangely absent.

Oh yeah, they’re mostly the same posters!


21 posted on 12/16/2014 3:57:46 PM PST by Rides_A_Red_Horse (Why do you need a fire extinguisher when you can call the fire department?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx
Ted absolutely OWNED that interview!! I think he might have scared Bret Baier a little.😃
22 posted on 12/16/2014 4:00:59 PM PST by TADSLOS (The Event Horizon has come and gone. Buckle up and hang on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

bkmk


23 posted on 12/16/2014 4:02:12 PM PST by AllAmericanGirl44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: uncitizen

Working as a speech writer for Mondale can do that to a person...


24 posted on 12/16/2014 4:04:48 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TADSLOS

Oh yeah! You’re right!


25 posted on 12/16/2014 4:06:04 PM PST by onyx (Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
"unapologetic Tea Partier"

Didn't he just apologize?

26 posted on 12/16/2014 4:06:26 PM PST by CivilWarBrewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Exactly! He’s all words! No action, just puffed up words written and/or spoken with a haughty condescending attitude to boot.


27 posted on 12/16/2014 4:07:07 PM PST by uncitizen (our government is treasonous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox
Why Ted Cruz is a leader:

While the basis of Ted Cruz's CRomnibus speech is against the funding of Amnesty in the budget bill, a lesson in politics begins at about 11 minutes. This is a 36 minute explanation of how our bills are passed that many people don’t seem to understand.

In the speech you hear Senator Cruz referring to Madame President and may wonder why. On this day, for political positioning Elizabeth Warren was given the leader’s chair. At the end Elizabeth Warren, the democrat presidential hopeful is dumbfounded by what was just presented and in her confusion she does what Barack Obama does – pushes the motion on to someone else that will be in charge later.

28 posted on 12/16/2014 4:08:06 PM PST by Baynative (Did you ever notice that atheists don't dare sue Muslims?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Shine the light on then TED!!!


29 posted on 12/16/2014 4:10:28 PM PST by mylife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
I do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me GOD.

.

.

If Mr. Boehner has no problem in lying to God, he sure will never have a problem lying to us.

30 posted on 12/16/2014 4:31:40 PM PST by Karl Spooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: uncitizen
Krauthammer is as phony as a 3-dollar bill!

I wouldn't go that far but I too am very disappointed in Krauthammer after his incredibly stupid comment about Cruz helping Harry Reid with the confirmations. In the interview, Cruz explained that all of these people were going to get confirmed this week anyway. So maybe the confirmations came a day earlier. This is a big deal? I think not.

And, amazingly, today when he was given the chance to correct the record on this sorry Cruz falling into a Harry Reid Trap theory he doubled down on it.

Bye bye Charles. You have lost a lot of fans here at FR.

31 posted on 12/16/2014 4:42:41 PM PST by InterceptPoint (Remember Mississippi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Every conservative will soon face the final challenge - abandon your principles or abandon the GOP. My choice is made.


32 posted on 12/16/2014 4:45:06 PM PST by Some Fat Guy in L.A. (Still bitterly clinging to rational thought despite it's unfashionability)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: navyguy

If Jeb Bush wins the nomination.. I will write in Cruz..

I am just waiting for Cruz to announce to get off my duff and help him win the primary.


33 posted on 12/16/2014 4:54:21 PM PST by cableguymn (We need a redneck in the white house....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

GREAT Article. BTTT!


34 posted on 12/16/2014 4:56:21 PM PST by Pagey (HELL is The 2nd Term of a POTUS who uses the terms “social justice” and “fair distribution".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

While John Boehner – the poster child for the GOP’s gooey, marshmallowy majority –

...

The GOPe wants Big Government, graft, and is waging war against conservatives who are against what they want. There is nothing GOOEY about it.


35 posted on 12/16/2014 4:57:17 PM PST by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

The GOPe who went down in flames with Romney, Father of RomneyCare/ObamaCare, blamed the four million conservatives who did not vote for his loss. There will be many millions more conservatives not voting in ‘16 if they stick us with Jeb or Christie. They will lose again because there aren’t enough White millionaires to vote secular Republican, where only their fat wallet issues matter.


36 posted on 12/16/2014 5:22:40 PM PST by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: dandiegirl

Yes , Baier did look a bit uncomfortable , but he asked good questions and allowed Cruz all the time he needed to explain his positions . Cruz hit it out of the park . I imagine Brett got a lot of emails regarding last nights show . I give him credit for giving equal time to Cruz .


37 posted on 12/16/2014 5:25:34 PM PST by katykelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Bkmk.


38 posted on 12/16/2014 5:43:51 PM PST by Jane Long ("And when thou saidst, Seek ye my face; my heart said unto thee, Thy face, LORD, will I seek")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: katykelly

I sent him an email last night. I hope many more did too.


39 posted on 12/16/2014 5:57:30 PM PST by dandiegirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: katykelly

It’s going to be hard to watch the constant free publicity for Jeb on FOX.


40 posted on 12/16/2014 5:58:44 PM PST by dandiegirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson