Posted on 12/13/2014 3:31:41 PM PST by ObamahatesPACoal
On Republicans working with Obama to pass a $1.1 trillion Omnibus spending bill written by and for the Chamber of Amnesty
I dont know how you go into 2016 and you say: Okay, I want you to support the GOP because we didnt stop immigration-amnesty, were gonna bring in a lot more guest workers, and we think its good to do these big omnibus bills oh, and by the way, were probably gonna fight a couple more wars. Vote for us.
What position would you rather be in? Warrens position or, like, Paul Ryan Mister Budget Hawk?
Oh boy, that Paul Ryan stuff. I dont know if that P90X deal did something to the way he thinks? I dunno.
(Excerpt) Read more at mofopolitics.com ...
Where is tough guy Scott Walker on Boehner-Ryan's budget?
These RINO governors are going to trash the Senators who are running when the Senators are the only one opposing Boehner-Ryan.
It’s very simple.
1. Paul Ryan is no Conservative.
2. Warren is lying.
Isn’t it so not surprising that Mittens picked him for his running mate?
Does anyone even know what Paul Ryan’s budget is?
During the 2012 vice-presidential debate, Paul Ryan had more than an hour of primetime television to explain his vaunted budget and why it would be so wonderful for America if it was enacted, yet all he did was stand there the whole time and let John Biden throw pies in his face. No wonder the Romney/Ryan ticket couldn’t even win Ryan’s home state of Wisconsin.
PAUL RYAN HAS LONG SINCE LEFT THE “CONSERVATIVE RESERVATION”. He’s now a renegade serving the RINO GOPe.
Even Megyn Kelley defers to Laura. Laura saw Reaganism in action way up first-hand at the beginning.
She ain’t gonna lie to you.
Figuring out Faucahontas is as simple as observing what Bill Clinton used to do. Wet the finger and stick it to the wind to figure out where to come dowm on any issue.
Both sad and shameful on Ryan’s part.
He is ready to remain a Back Bencher. The campaign was too grueling for him. I’ve never been through anything close to that. I guess I’d want to avoid a repeat in Hell’s Kitchen too.
Zackley.
You don’t need to know what she said - only that she said something.
The complete lack of moral compass or principles precludes the truth from ever getting out. There simply is no truth.
Baring a miracle, 2016 will be like a primary of the Uniparty with no choice for Conservatives and other constitutionalists who actually want to do some of the things the GOP said, but then proceeded to do the exact opposite and become Obama’s auxiliary.
“The complete lack of moral compass or principles precludes the truth from ever getting out. There simply is no truth.”
“Up” is “Down” to these people if it serves their narrative on the day they open their mouthes. There are a lot of RATS (and sadly some RINOS) who are being pilloried by their words today versus a year ago. Megyn Kelly has been showing ample examples in recent days with Fauxahauntas at the head of her list.
Where is tough guy Scott Walker on Boehner-Ryan’s budget?
They’re all at home hiding under their sofas after voting to fund Obama’s amnesty. Ryan, Chaffetz, Yoho, etc. All the fake conservatives. Pathetic.
The Dems even in minority are going run Congress and steam roll the GOP like they did during the Bush era.
I still remember when Paul Ryan was the darling of so many posters here. But that was a couple of years ago. How things change!
Wasn’t Ryan always a Chamber of Commerce guy that Romney thought he could pass off as a conservative? As the campaign wore on, it began to show that Ryan has no passion for constitutional conservative principles.
Ryan is not the same person he was in 2011 and 2012...able to get on TV and rationally defend a reasonable budget alternative. He’s lost his way.
“Ryan is not the same person he was in 2011 and 2012...able to get on TV and rationally defend a reasonable budget alternative. Hes lost his way.”
He lost it when he started prepping for the debates.
Only two candidates have the hutzpah to counter effectively with opponents in debates. Not Paul Ryan, not Jeb Bush, not Romney (most cowardly of them all), not Santorum, not walker, not Pence, not Kasich, and not Perry. Some others have the intellectual capacity such as Jindal & Rubio but lack forcefulness.
So that leaves 2 others who can get in your face and are never afraid to present an EFFECTIVE counterpoint. Christy and Cruz. But Christy has too many issues I consider as too liberal for my taste. I am hoping it will be Cruz versus Hillary in final debates. A champion debater from Harvard versus “what difference does it make” Hilda, the expert at making a fast buck in options trading.
I am of the mind to verify BEFORE trust.
I’m usually right. It doesn’t them long to join the “club”
Correction: Add Paul Rand with Jindal & Rubio.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.