Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Staten Island DA Didn't Ask Garner Grand Jury To Consider Reckless Endangerment Charge: Source
NBC New York ^ | 12/5/2014 | Andrew Siff

Posted on 12/05/2014 10:11:22 AM PST by Laissez-faire capitalist

Staten Island's top prosecutor did not ask grand jurors to consider a reckless endangerment charge in the chokehold death of Eric Garner, a source familiar with the case told NBC 4 New York.

District Attorney Daniel Donovan only asked grand jurors to consider criminally negligent homicide charges against NYPD officer Daniel Pantaleo...

(Excerpt) Read more at nbcnewyork.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: danieldonovan; danielpantaleo; ericgarner; garner; statenisland
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
New York law says that reckless endangerment is when conduct causes substantial risk of death or even serious physical injury.
1 posted on 12/05/2014 10:11:22 AM PST by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist; All; Conscience of a Conservative; dead; Fury

I thought you might be interested...


2 posted on 12/05/2014 10:12:30 AM PST by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

Unlike Ferguson

This one may merit further grand jury


3 posted on 12/05/2014 10:13:06 AM PST by wardaddy (glenn beck is a nauseous politically correct conservative on LSD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

Unlike Ferguson

This one may merit further grand jury


4 posted on 12/05/2014 10:13:39 AM PST by wardaddy (glenn beck is a nauseous politically correct conservative on LSD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist; therut; DoodleDawg; HamiltonJay

I thought you might be interested in this as well...

Glenn Beck, Charles Krauthammer, Andrew Napolitano and many others may have been right that there should have been an indictment.


5 posted on 12/05/2014 10:15:14 AM PST by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy

Would that not be double jeopardy?


6 posted on 12/05/2014 10:15:18 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

I don’t know what to think of this matter, I have seen the video, but there is so much more relevant information which has not been released. Like this fellow’s specific medical history.

But, ignoring all that, and just supposing that a reckless endangerment charge had been submitted, and that the grand jury said no to all other charges, and yes to reckless endangerment, does anyone think the public protests would be any different?

...

I didn’t think so.


7 posted on 12/05/2014 10:16:59 AM PST by Wally_Kalbacken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

Grand juries are not criminal trials.


8 posted on 12/05/2014 10:17:14 AM PST by DHerion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

BLACK FEMALE Police Sergeant Supervised Eric Garner’s Deadly Arrest
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3233734/posts


9 posted on 12/05/2014 10:18:24 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (The question isn't who is going to let me; it's who is going to stop me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

When a prosecutor doesn’t want an indictment, he’s not going to get one.

There was an exception a few years ago when a grand jury indicted some public officials for crimes the prosecutor didn’t even present. That jury figured out the scam.


10 posted on 12/05/2014 10:19:06 AM PST by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DHerion

I know that, but forgive my ignorance—are multiple grand juries called for single offenses? If so, why?


11 posted on 12/05/2014 10:19:50 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

Jeopardy does nor attach until a trial jury is sworn in.


12 posted on 12/05/2014 10:20:04 AM PST by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

No.

There was a prior grand jury ruling where a police officer was not indicted. I don’t remember all of the particulars, but I do remember that someone on CNN said that a judge ordered it to go back to another grand jury trial because he said that lies were told when testimonies were being taken.

I’m not sure if that is the only reason a 2nd grand jury trial can be ordered by a judge...


13 posted on 12/05/2014 10:20:05 AM PST by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

Grand jury is not a trial

They can reconsider

For many reasons

Or go Federal

I am not keen on retrying acquitted folks for federal civil rights

Its never been fairly applied and smacks of double jeopardy

The feds use it to circumvent jury nullification when victims are black

If I’m wrong about grand juries being one shot I’ll stand corrected


14 posted on 12/05/2014 10:23:18 AM PST by wardaddy (glenn beck is a nauseous politically correct conservative on LSD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I saw this talked about on Fox News if I am not mistaken or was it CNN? I watch shows on both of them as long as it isn’t a blatant establishment host that is on.

Was she one of those that helped in the submission of Eric Garner or was she watching? If she was watching, I wonder what her seniority was compared to those who helped in the submission of Eric Garner.


15 posted on 12/05/2014 10:24:32 AM PST by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

Yep, corruption, not because of race, but to protect the “thin blue line”.... This stinks to high heaven.


16 posted on 12/05/2014 10:27:40 AM PST by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

The officers were using standard police take down procedures. I suspect that at the time of the take down that the officers were not aware of his weakened physical condition.


17 posted on 12/05/2014 10:27:43 AM PST by Captain Compassion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wally_Kalbacken

The medical history for Eric Garner seems to be leaking out.

I honestly think that he should have been ticketed and that alone.

They knew his name, where he lived, next of kin, etc, etc, as he had already been arrested before for selling loosies - so there was no reason why they couldn’t have just given him a ticket and be done with it - like they will do for those caught with small amounts of marijuana.

A guest on CNN (a law enforcement officer) said that this came down to “quality of life” police enforcement.


18 posted on 12/05/2014 10:33:10 AM PST by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist
First of all it wasn't a CHOKE HOLD, it was a “Take down maneuver" taught in the police academy.
Tell a lie ofter enough and it becomes the truth.
Second, if he's in a choke hold how can he say”I cant breath”
Third the take down maneuver lasted no more than 12-15 seconds.

Fourth, ask any cop... the first thing people say when they're cuffed is "I can't breath"because they aren't used to having their hands behind their backs, causing pressure on the chest.

19 posted on 12/05/2014 10:54:57 AM PST by Robe (Rome did not create a great empire by talking, they did it by killing all those who opposed them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

It’s funny but I live on Staten Island and I don’t remember Glenn Beck, Charles Krauthammer or Andrew Napolitano showing up at the grand jury hearing or having heard a single word of testimony but they KNOW the cop should have been indicted. Each of them is grabbing at their own “Ferguson Moment” to make themselves feel better.


20 posted on 12/05/2014 11:16:14 AM PST by jmaroneps37 (Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson