Posted on 11/21/2014 4:28:57 PM PST by Brown Deer
If President Obama grants executive amnesty to an unknown millions of Americans, theres only one way Republicans can stop him impeachment.
On Thursdays show, the Judge told FOX News Radios Tom Sullivan why the President may have to resort to such extreme measures. He says, while Presidents do have right to practice prosecutorial discretion when it comes to immigration, Obamas proposed actions risk nullifying the law altogether. And thats going too far.
(Excerpt) Read more at radio.foxnews.com ...
There is not a majority in the Senate big enough to make it worth while.
The G.ive O.bama P.ower party has ruled
impeachment out, as before,
and then they hurried home to hide again,
and to encourage more antiConstitutional behavior again
from the First Undocumented Sociopath,
as they have done before, over and over.
They are EXEMPT and DO NOT CARE about the People
whom they rule below themselves.
None of the Republican politicians are talking about Impeachment. That’s why I think it’s precisely what they will do -— next year.
I believe the President cannot pardon somebody who has not been convicted of a crime.
Anybody know?
Impeach. Remove from office. Arrest. Convict. Imprison for life.
Impeachment turned against the Republicans because Clinton was still relatively popular with the public - Nixon was on the way out when his own party turned against him and pulled the rug out from under him - with Obama’s approval rating this week down to 37%, he may just be getting into an area where he is in fact vulnerable....
Which is exactly what a court will say... “Constitution says right here that you can impeach him.... I don’t see anything else on this”
One point of clarification:
Nixon was NEVER impeached.
He had more respect for this country than either Bill Clinton or Barack Obama.
it is not going to happen.
It is over. The left and the GOP-e are one.
It is like killing one rat in your garage and hoping the new rat will not chew and eat your stuff. They are still rats.
Bastards.
Ford pardoned Nixon who was never convicted of anything.
Thanks. I had forgotten about that.
5.56mm
No, it is not.
Jimmy Carter granted amnesty from prosecution to draft dodgers.
The limits of prosecutorial discretion are not defined, and are arbitrary.
The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence. LINK
The President of the United States swears an oath. Here is that oath.
It is found at the bottom of Article II, Section 2 of the U. S. Constitution.
I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. LINK
This is only one of several ways a president could be challenged for having done what Obama has. He is tasked with preventing the states from being invaded. He has shirked that obligation. Further, he is not tasked to facilitate it.
A sitting governor could challenge him on this. That governor's state having been over-run by illegal aliens, that governor has every right to demand they be removed, not made legal.
What Obama has done is unconstitutional.
“Could he not just issue pardons to all those wet backs?”
He can pardon them for past actions, not future ones.
On second after the ink dries on his signature, they are all illegally in the country.
“Nixon was NEVER impeached.
He had more respect for this country than either Bill Clinton or Barack Obama.”
True. Watergate was a media coup.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.