It backfired on the Democrats bigtime when their "Libertarian" patsy was discovered to have really been a LIBERAL who supported ObamaCare. Yeah, like a REAL Libertarian would support that big government program.
1 posted on
11/06/2014 2:22:02 PM PST by
PJ-Comix
To: PJ-Comix
I have theorized the same here in FL. Didn’t look at the numbers, so I may be off, but I wonder if the libertarian didn’t help Scott. Crist was on the ballot, and the Libertarian probably napped some votes that would have gon to Crist...we had the medical marijuana amendment which drew out the drug-related libertarians. I can imagine many of them didn’t vote or say the big L and opted for that candidate.
2 posted on
11/06/2014 2:25:30 PM PST by
ilgipper
To: PJ-Comix
....and yet, Greg Brannon would not say to support Tillis over Haugh.
To: PJ-Comix
The Republican lost because he got less votes than the Democrats. The Republican did not lose because of the libertarian
5 posted on
11/06/2014 2:28:10 PM PST by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
To: PJ-Comix
UNCG political science professor Thom Little What's with all the "Thom's" in NC?
6 posted on
11/06/2014 2:28:40 PM PST by
MUDDOG
To: PJ-Comix
...two-thirds of Haugh's votes likely would've gone to Kay Hagan...That margin would have been very close to what Hagan lost by last night
Good. I hope the witch is heart sick and grieves over this loss for a long time.
7 posted on
11/06/2014 2:29:11 PM PST by
Din Maker
(I've always been crazy, but, that's the only thing that's kept me from going insane.)
To: PJ-Comix
Losertarians aren’t funny.
9 posted on
11/06/2014 2:32:36 PM PST by
Drango
(A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
To: PJ-Comix
Libertarians tend to be pro-marijuana, which helps them to take votes from low-information liberals. They also claim to support small government (and real libertarians do support small government), which helps them take votes from republicans. Supporting marijuana matters more with the low-information voters.
11 posted on
11/06/2014 2:34:48 PM PST by
Pollster1
("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
To: PJ-Comix
If most libertarians aren’t DemocRAT operatives; they might as well be.
They do nothing but split votes away from conservatives.
I’d rather support a RINO.
17 posted on
11/06/2014 2:39:40 PM PST by
Responsibility2nd
(NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
To: PJ-Comix
In what universe would someone be willing to vote for either a libertarian and a ‘Rat?
Makes no sense.
18 posted on
11/06/2014 2:40:38 PM PST by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
To: PJ-Comix
Thom Tillis wants to increase legal immigration.
I hope the new speaker in NC can repeal Tillis amnesty bill.
To: PJ-Comix
Oh, come on. Every Libertarian in NC voted for Haugh plus a bunch of POed Conservatives.
I didn’t hear from any Democrats that jumped all the way over the R to vote for the L.
They’re drunk and reaching for straws.
28 posted on
11/06/2014 3:13:37 PM PST by
PeteB570
( Islam is the sea in which the Terrorist Shark swims. The deeper the sea the larger the shark.)
To: PJ-Comix
We should advertise the libertarians marijuana platform. That would pull away a lot of Democrats.
32 posted on
11/06/2014 4:04:05 PM PST by
FreeAtlanta
(Liberty or Big Government - you can't have both.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson