Posted on 10/27/2014 3:27:48 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
The Muslim extremist who attacked rookie cops with a hatchet last week was “a crusader seeking justice’’ — and more assaults will likely follow, the head of his local New Black Panther Party warned.
“It probably won’t be the last [attack on police] because you have a lot of frustrated people out here,” Queens chapter leader Frank Sha Francois told The Post.
Francois said ax-wielding Zale Thompson wasn’t officially a member of his group, but he came to meetings and they talked about “police brutality” cases such as Eric Garner and Michael Brown.
“I don’t condone violence, but something needs to be done,” Francois said. “We need to have some type of deterrent and real oversight to deter the police from violating the laws and to know they are not above the laws.”
While he hailed the ax man as a “crusader,” Francois insisted he didn’t agree with Thompson’s methods....
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
Propaganda trick as old as progressivism itself. Shroud your nefarious intent, intent your supporters will not mistake, using terms that the people you wish to harm will accept. Same as when black "leaders" from the Ferguson ordeal talk about equality and justice when the mean lynch the whitey regardless of the facts.
What this Black Panther means when he talks about oversight and accountability is that cops should be punished for arresting blacks.
The Black Panthers have declared outright war against the police, and the liberals still refuse to allow the police or private citizens to hunt the Black Panthers down. We need our own Pinochet!
The cops survived and the moose-limb attacker is in a drawer at the coroner's office.
Questions, class ?
I agree.
What an agonizing life Frank Sha Francois must live, waking each day to see a Black Man in the mirror.
These are WITHHOLDER’S and THE FOREIGNERS people.
This city needs a hero.
(Imagine that, a muslim ‘crusader’. )
LOL! My thoughts exactly. I don’t think that Black Panthers thug thought about it at all!
(Imagine that, a muslim ‘crusader’. )
LOL! My thoughts exactly. I don’t think that Black Panthers thug thought about it at all!
If you knew who would get appointed for oversight you sure would.
I do not think that word means what you think it does.
I can argue with that!
To paint “the police” as law violators who think they are above the laws is a form of racism directed at an entire group of people who have a very difficult job, one that exposes them to the worst of humanity daily, and often causes them serious bodily harm and injury.
Any category of people include in their midst some individuals who abuse the public trust, be they police, lawyers, bankers, physicians, landlords, or clergy.
It is ignorant to condemn an entire category because of the “bad apples”.
It is wise to cull these from group by legal means, not by violence.
I don’t condone violence, except when I condone it.
Typical answer from a typical asswipe.
Queens chapter leader Frank Sha Francois.
Really? The Black Panther Party?
Well, I guess white people are screwed. We have the CPUSA, The Socialist caucus in Congress, CAIR, Nation of Islam, the ACLU, The Southern Poverty Law Center, The Soros Foundation, Warren Buffet and Bill Gates, SEIU and ACORN, The Rat party, the NAACP, the Urban League, 90% of all media and 99% of all academia all the way down to pre-school level, and most PC corporations (a few excluded but soon to be neutered) all engaged in an unrelenting assault on freedom and rule of law under the US constitution.
Oh yes. If you are normal, you are being screwed, raped and assaulted. Crime? You are white. You are independent. You are a patriot, a veteran, a conservative, but mostly, you are white. And most whites are too afraid to shove back. Too afraid someone will claim they are racist and sue them or their employer and they will lose whatever pissant job they have manage to acquire in the great Obamatullah depression.
That was harsh, meant every effing word.
And if one of the white cops shoots to save his life we will have race riots.
Here is the statement with which I agreed:
“We need to have some type of deterrent and real oversight to deter the police from violating the laws and to know they are not above the laws.”
Is there anything about that statement, as it stands, that is the least bit objectionable?
Now I recognize this person did not really mean what he said, that his reasonable statement is merely cover for his racist objectives. But that doesn’t make the statement itself any less reasonable.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.