Posted on 10/20/2014 10:37:44 AM PDT by george76
In the wake of the blockbuster investigation that broke an Islamic plot to take over UK public schools wide open, nothing has been done to take back those schools from Muslim goons. Nothing. Sir Michael Wilshaw, Ofsted’s chief inspector, said schools at the center of the Islamic”Trojan Horse” affair were failed to improve. The schools held hostage by Islamic supremacists at the centre of the takeover plot are still promoting an “unbalanced curriculum” and promoting Islamic supremacism and Islamic misogyny.
Instead, dhimmi British authorities have targeted — Christian schools. They know Christians will not fight. They know Christians school present no threat. There are no fears, for unlike Muslims, Christians won’t blow up the Parliament or behead non-Christians.
(Excerpt) Read more at pamelageller.com ...
Christian school ‘downgraded for failing to invite an imam to lead assembly’ in the wake of Islamic takeover plot of public schools
Maybe it’s time to fight?
When the article says “Christians will not fight”, the author forgets about the concept of non-violent resistance. The headmasters of these schools could have chosen to go to jail. Or... they could have invited the imam to teach a lesson on the manner in which Muslims accept Christians as full citizens in Moslem countries. Granted, it would have been a very short lesson, but that alone would have been instructive.
Brits don’t know how.
Those that would have been disarmed.
Wait until the schools are taken over by the rape gangs, wonder what they will put on the report cards?
There are exceptions, of course. Britain, and most likely the free world, can be very thankful it had Churchill for WWII.
It’s the Islamic State of the UK. What else?
Perhaps you missed the story of the Brit who was arrested for quoting Churchill.
Do they teach what religion is most violent?
Saw it and wasn't surprised at the arrest, but certainly was dismayed.
IMO, the arrest stands for the proposition Britain has become more of what it was immediately prior to and shortly after it let Churchill do the heavy lifting, and bear the risk necessary for its victory in WWII.
Of concern is that Britain may now stand as a model for the proposition that with passive politicians, a successful nation can fail from alien forces within without a shot being fired.
Of course, they may point to the anti-American element within our government with its taxpayer funded voting block and say the same about us.
Bookmark
Brits have always been renowned for fighting ability.
If and when the British people get tired of their present bloviating buffoon “leaders,” the elitists pushing them around may just get a reintroduction at a very personal level to that ability.
It is not a very good website, the articles are not particularly well-written, but it sounds like Christian and conservative Jewish schools are being forced to accept BOTH radical liberalism AND Muslim conservatism, whereas the Muslims are allowed to do as they please. This is PSYCHOTIC.
There was a time when the Spartans were the toughest fighters, the Macedonians, or the Romans. Today, people from those countries would not be considered a serious military or resistance group.
Britain of 100 years could fight, Britain of today - not so much - they have been metro-sexualized. The days when Brits would and could fight are long over - they will rollover along with all of Europe and become mooselim dominated. It’s over for them. Give it another 50 years and they will be foreigners in their own country.
Bump
Agreed. Recent military history (1914 >) offers many impressive examples of ability with the most impressive, IMO, being at the individual and small unit level.
More generally, the British/Canadian/Australian soldier has always appeared willing to "climb out of the trenches" and go forward in the face of appalling odds.
Bringing it to the present, however, there is almost certainly a recognizable point in time when a culture is likely to be overwhelmed and buried by its mistakes.
I am an optimist, and hope your “if and when” scenario plays out in this case.
“More generally, the British/Canadian/Australian soldier has always appeared willing to “climb out of the trenches” and go forward in the face of appalling odds. “
.
More Brits and French died there. Its a myth, great ANZAC bravery aside, that it was an Aussie-Kiwi battle. The British and French fought just as bravely and in larger numbers and larger casualties.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
