Posted on 10/09/2014 2:03:28 PM PDT by wagglebee
Pedophilia, in the sense of the persistent sexual attraction to children, is a disorder, not a crime, and deserves special protections in law. That’s the premise of a recent New York Times opinion piece by Rutgers law professor Margo Kaplan, who argues that “stigma” surrounding adults who are sexually attracted to children prevents them from seeking psychological help.
As a result, Kaplan asserts, pedophiles should be protected by the same anti-discrimination laws that require society to accommodate other “disabilities.”
“By some estimates, 1 percent of the male population continues, long after puberty, to find themselves attracted to prepubescent children. These people are living with pedophilia, a sexual attraction to prepubescents that often constitutes a mental illness,” Kaplan wrote. “Unfortunately, our laws are failing them and, consequently, ignoring opportunities to prevent child abuse.”
According to Kaplan, pedophilia should be covered under the Americans With Disabilities Act and the Rehabilitation Act, which, she says “prohibit discrimination against otherwise qualified individuals with mental disabilities, in areas such as employment, education and medical care.”
“Congress, however, explicitly excluded pedophilia from protection under these two crucial laws.”
“It’s time to revisit these categorical exclusions,” Kaplan asserted. “Without legal protection, a pedophile cannot risk seeking treatment or disclosing his status to anyone for support. He could lose his job, and future job prospects, if he is seen at a group-therapy session, asks for a reasonable accommodation to take medication or see a psychiatrist, or requests a limit in his interaction with children. Isolating individuals from appropriate employment and treatment only increases their risk of committing a crime.”
Kaplan says the idea that pedophiles choose to think of children in a sexual way is a “misconception.” As evidence, she points to a group called “Virtuous Pedophiles,” an online forum where men who struggle with attraction to children support each other in their efforts to resist the temptation to abuse.
Kaplan also pointed to research performed on convicted child molesters showing differences in brain structure between healthy men and pedophiles.
“Recent research, while often limited to sex offenders — because of the stigma of pedophilia — suggests that the disorder may have neurological origins,” Kaplan wrote. “Pedophilia could result from a failure in the brain to identify which environmental stimuli should provoke a sexual response. M.R.I.s of sex offenders with pedophilia show fewer of the neural pathways known as white matter in their brains. Men with pedophilia are three times more likely to be left-handed or ambidextrous, a finding that strongly suggests a neurological cause.”
Keith Ablow, a prominent psychiatrist and frequent Fox News contributor, agrees with Kaplan that pedophilia is a disorder. But in a written response to Kaplan’s piece, Ablow strongly objected to the notion that the “stigma” surrounding the disorder should be removed.
“Well-focused shame still has a place, even in the halls of law and medicine,” Ablow argued. “The need to hide impulses, like the impulse to rape children and feeling guilty about it, and taking it upon oneself to control the impulse or go to jail for giving into it, can be part of a reasoned legal and public health strategy to prevent it. Being shunned should be a decent heads-up that it's time to get help and stay away from temptation – or else.”
“Kaplan is right that pedophilia is a disorder,” adds Ablow, explaining that he has found that people who are attracted to children were often sexually abused. “But Kaplan is wrong to suggest that, merely because something is a known disorder, it should result in protections under the law.”
“Pedophiles are no more worthy of protections as disabled Americans than those with other abnormal sexual desires – called paraphilias – which include the desire, for instance, to rape adult women or have sex with animals. Can you imagine a culture in which men can declare that their unwieldy desires to rape women merit them – not the women – being escorted to their vehicles in darkened parking lots after working the late shift?
A movement to normalize pedophilia has been gaining steam in recent years, with advocates of pedophilia arguing that their orientation is no different than other misunderstood “sexual orientations.”
If Congress does take up the issue of pedophilia with regard to the ADA, it won’t be the first time a law has been discussed that could offer special legal protections for pedophiles. The Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA), which was passed by the Senate in last November, would bar employers from discriminating based on “sexual orientation.”
At the time ENDA passed, the American Psychological Association had just defined pedophilia as a sexual orientation in their newly-released DSM-V, the handbook for diagnosing mental illness. The APA has since apologized, calling the classification an “error” and promising to update the online and future print editions of the manual defining pedophilia as a “sexual interest,” not an orientation. In the meantime, current print editions of the manual still define pedophilia as a “sexual orientation.”
That’s a MAN, bay-bee!
Didn’t we all say that this was coming? Isn’t that exactly how progressivism works?
I have a rule of thumb about pedophiles.
Don’t call the cops, get a rope.
“Was this article written by Stephen Collins and Roman Polanski”
Yepper, in consultation with various tribal chiefs in Afghanistan, other trashcanistans in that area.
With no scientific evidence gays have said they are born that way and pedos will soon say the same.
Oh man, I *know* that look...that batspit-crazy chick look...
*shudder*
You can argue that virtually any vice, regardless of whether it has anything to do with sex, is the result of some inborn tendency. Therefore, the ultimate destination of progressivism is anarchy, the war of all against all.
Apparently this Rutgers law professor Margo Kaplan, is concerned about his own future, I strongly suspect he is a Pedophile.
She’s a she.
Or maybe, she prefers to be an it? I don’t want to offend her/him/whatever.
could this person have been born a BRUCE?
sure looks like it to me!!
Leftism really is a mental illness
Hey, I agree with the first part of his reasoning, that it is a mental disorder. But from that point, the only question should be is “What type of brain surgery should be used to correct it? Physical surgery or chemical surgery?”
Basically, to fry the part of the brain that leads them to attack children.
She has the crazy eyes and smug assurance of someone who wants
power over others and wants to rub perversion in our faces.
Today the left claims that Americans are “right wing” for being disgusted by gay “marriages”
Soon, apparently, the left will claim that Americans are “right wing” for being disgusted with lowering the age of consent.
he she or it .... has “power” issues...and is astonishingly Confused......in a pathological...sense..
aka Mr Margo is Nuttier Than a Fruitcake
The gays say we're "homophobic". Shouldn't phobias be "protected", too?
If this behavior is to be considered a mental disorder, and not criminal, then I think that equal treatment ought to be given to the mental disorder that compels the parent or other family member of the victimized child to either kill or beat the ever-living crap out of the “non-criminal” pedophile. After all, it is far more natural to want to protect one’s offspring or close relatives as it is for an adult to have sexual relations with an innocent child.
Something tells me that these hypocritical deviants won’t agree with this.
Put the perverts in asylums for criminals with uncontrollable mental illnesses and see how quickly they decide that it’s not a mental illness.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.