Posted on 10/06/2014 12:30:42 PM PDT by Zakeet
The nations tough anti-pedophilia laws are unfair to pedophiles, according to an op-ed published by The New York Times editors.
One can live with pedophilia and not act on it, says Margo Kaplan, an entrepreneurial assistant law professor at Rutgers University, and a former lawyer for the American Civil Liberties Union.
Tragically, the roughly 1 percent of people who are sexually attracted to children] must hide their disorder from everyone they know or risk losing educational and job opportunities, and face the prospect of harassment and even violence, she wrote.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
You bad old conservatives are making people who are sexually attracted to children hide their disorder from everyone they know or risk losing educational and job opportunities, and face the prospect of harassment and even violence!
When the DemocRATS aren’t killing or using children for political props, they use them for their sex toys. The NYT maggots should be proud.
This week’s sign that the Apocalypse is indeed upon us...
Creeping perversion or Creeping Perversion, the end result will be that Creeps are legalizing themselves...
Ping.
Mandatory euthanasia would not be unfair to pedophiles.
LOL! The NYT states the percentage of pedophiles is 1% as if it were a fact. Here is the fact, there are an equal amount of homosexuals and pedophiles. Go aahead NYT. You pick the number. I’ll say 2-3%.
Only a fool wouldn’t have seen this coming.
This has been coming for decades.
Kinsey started the normalization of Pedophilia.
Who the hell is still reading this communist rag?!
I have serious doubts about the 1% figure, I think it is probably much lower. But wait in the next couple of years we will read that an even higher percentage of the population or pedophiles in an attempt to normalize it.
Haven’t we been to this show before?
Nothing gets done without politics.
It doesnt help when the NAMBLA spokesman describes himself as a Libertarian in an interview with Spy magazine.
This 2008 Time article may explain more on that.
The fracas started with Mary J. Ruwart, the candidate with perhaps the deepest, purest libertarian roots
In April, a rival called her out for her thoughts in a 1999 book called Short Answers to the Tough Questions. Children who willingly participate in sexual acts have the right to make that decision as well, even if its distasteful to us personally, Ruwart wrote. When we outlaw child pornography, the prices paid for child performers rise, increasing the incentives for parents to use children against their will.
And so begins the progressive drumbeat for the next “civil rights” movement. Cass Sunstein must be smiling.
it’s not unlike Whoopi’s strange and fascinating moral universe, which includes the concept of “rape-rape.”
Same way with the International Court of Human Rights ... Jihad John will be accorded all his rights ... saying if he’s captured alive.
I’m pretty sure ESPN and ABC sports said we were all supposed to be in an tizzy over Jerry Sandusky and his shower horsing around, but now it turns out he was a brave freedom fighter? The mental illness of liberalism prevents principled rationalism.
Once it’s known they’re pedophiles, they’re ALREADY a direct threat to children. There’s no middle ground on this one.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.