Posted on 09/30/2014 10:37:20 AM PDT by bgill
It was an altercation that likely would have been buried in the reams of other ugly domestic disputes in New York. Except the accused was Ailina Tsarnaeva, the 24-year-old sister of alleged Boston Marathon bombers Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev. And, according to police, she allegedly threatened the other woman by telling her, “I have people. I know people that can put a bomb where you live.”
(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...
Hell we didn’t investigate them when we were specifically warned about that particular family.
Deport her. Let Putin take care of her.
The mother of those boys was the real loud mouth...proud as hell of her sons....spewing her muslim cr**.
Not only that, the boys slit someones throat years before and no one looked...just another fine example of Obama's PC world...Same with Hassan...
That is a pretty fancy hijab. Methinks it would be considered haram in some circles.
Then again, maybe some wish her to remain here so it is easier to keep an eye on her. Difficult to say exactly [i]what[/i] is the reason.
That victim was of the Jewish faith.
Near Brandeis, a Jewish College.
Not only was it swept under the rug, the victim was slandered as a “drug deal gone bad”.
No one dare call it “Jihad”.
A Hijab Honey. Mad Mo would approve.
She’s 24? She looks 14.
They fit right in with the Boston Uber-hip College crowd.
Being a Rock Musician in the Boston/Cambridge area, I ran into a lot of these types.
There was one young lady who went from being nominally Christian to witchcraft, to Hinduism, and lastly to islam. I guess she didn’t realize at the time that there would be no more “moving on” from that one without risking her life.
God, reading the litany of crimes this whole family has is bizarre to say the least.
Crime is in the blood.
I hope they nail the sister for accessory after the fact and impeding investigation.
Women in prison are notorious for being exceptionally cruel — and chances are good that more than a few know are related through family or friendship to the victims.
She will NOT have a good time of it in prison.
===============================================
MASSACHUSETTS TAXPAYERS WERE UNKNOWINGLY FORCED TO FINANCE THE TSARNEV BROTHERS' DIRTY DEEDS BIGTIME ---After the Boston bombing, Massachusetts Democrat Gov Deval Patrick refused to divulge info WRT massive public assistance to the bomber killers/Chechen immigrants.
But state welfare officials were forced to come clean b/c the info is available to lawmakers. State Rep David Linsky called on the Mass Dept of Transitional Assistance to provide the info..... issuing an ultimatum, giving them 24 hours to provide the info.
The Boston Herald published the state's response: 'My office is working to fully comply with your request,' DTA interim commissioner Stacey Monahan wrote, saying they were only providing a summary 'given the great interest in this matter.'
Chechen immigrants--the bombers' parents----were eligible as legal, non-citizen residents who claimed "asylum" status and met the eligibility criteria for DTA, DTA interim commissioner Stacey Monahan said in a letter to David Linsky, Chairman of the Mass House Post Audit and Oversight Committee.
Multiple state agencies, on orders from Democrat Gov Patrick, refused to comment on the bomber brothers' welfare haul.
<><> WRT Tamerlan receiving UI benefits, Labor dept spokesman Kevin Franck refused to comment....
<><> Univ of Mass-- Dartmouth spokesman Robert Connolly refused to comment on the financial aid app of 19 -year-old soph Dzhokhar. 'It is our position - and I believe the accepted position in higher education - that student records including academic records and financial records (including financial aid) cannot under federal law be released without a student’s consent.'
<><> The FCC would not discuss whether the suspected bombers had govt-paid Obamaphones.
<><> Cambridge housing officials would not comment on if the brothers had Section 8 rental subsidy offered by the HUD to low income households.
==================================================
Benefits for entire family of bombing suspects likely exceeded $100k
WCRB ^ | 4/29/2013 | By Janet Wu / FR Posted by Alistair Stratford IV
BOSTON — State lawmakers have launched an investigation into whether the suspects in the Boston bombings improperly received public benefits. The House Committee on Post Audit and Oversight is reviewing hundreds of documents collected from state agencies that may have provided benefits to the suspects or their families since 2002.
Sources who have seen the 500 pages of documents sent to the House Committee on Post Audit and Oversight told News Center 5 that the entire Tsarnaev family, including:
(1) the two bombing suspects' parents (mother absconded--wanted for shoplifting),
(2) the two suspects themselves,
(3) their trouble-making sisters (one arrested for bomb threats),
(4) the widow of the suspect killed, and,
(5) their child.
Could also include benefits for their Chechen "student" pals who tampered w/ bombing evidence (one is now in jail, the other going to trial).
The Chechen cabal received "every conceivable public benefit available out there." (Excerpt) Read more at wcvb.com ...
SOURCE http://www.wcvb.com/news/local/metro/hearing-set-to-look-at-tsarnaev-family-welfare- benefits/-/11971628/19933058/-/9yagjz/-/index.html#ixzz2RtfE87js
=================================================
NTL REVIEW/BY DAVID HANSON----The Tsarnaev brothers offer us a teachable moment about what has become near-suicidal US immigration policies. The sap-happy government cannot assure the public that it is now enforcing immigration laws already on the books,
(1) that foreign nationals must at least avoid criminal activity,
(2) that foreigners must stay off public assistance,
(3) that the US govt is disinclined to grant "asylum" (means a free ride on the US gravy train and endless SS payments) to “fearful refugees” from war-torn Islamic regions,
(4) on-the-book govt mandates that force struggling taxpayers to foot the bill for the refugees to go back and forth between America and their supposedly hostile homelands on the taxpayers' dime.
Proof that evil isn’t always ugly. Was not Lucifer a beautiful angel?We must learn to look beyond the superficial.
Was she talking to the tyranny in the white house?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.