1 posted on
09/16/2014 4:02:32 PM PDT by
South40
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
To: South40
Who is funding them? Brady? Bloomberg? Both?
2 posted on
09/16/2014 4:04:33 PM PDT by
2ndDivisionVet
(I will raise $2Million USD for Cruz and/or Palin's next run, what will you do?)
To: South40
An earlier article said that the Brady group was suing the vendors. I guess the Brady group went ambulance chasing for a family “with standing”.
Is this family also suing the theater as some victims’ families are doing?
6 posted on
09/16/2014 4:09:19 PM PDT by
a fool in paradise
(Hey Obama: If Islamic State is not Islamic, then why did you give Osama Bin Laden a muslim funeral?)
To: South40
Perhaps they should sue Hollywood for making movies for theaters.
7 posted on
09/16/2014 4:09:52 PM PDT by
American in Israel
(A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
To: South40
But they aren’t suing the shooter.
Harassment suit.
10 posted on
09/16/2014 4:11:57 PM PDT by
AppyPappy
(If you really want to annoy someone, point out something obvious they are trying hard to ignore.)
To: South40
The premise is a lie. The lawyer of the parents brought the suit after coercing the parents into believing they will be guilty for ever if they don’t.
such a lawyer needs to be exiled to lower slabovia
11 posted on
09/16/2014 4:12:58 PM PDT by
bert
((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc.;+12 ..... Obama is public enemy #1)
To: South40
Did the ammo malfunction?
13 posted on
09/16/2014 4:14:54 PM PDT by
marron
To: South40
Dang! No bargains there. They want $69 for a brick. I just got some for $25.
14 posted on
09/16/2014 4:15:02 PM PDT by
Slump Tester
(What if I'm pregnant Teddy? Errr-ahh -Calm down Mary Jo, we'll cross that bridge when we come to it)
To: South40
I can understand their hurt but they’re just grasping at straws ...
15 posted on
09/16/2014 4:15:03 PM PDT by
SkyDancer
(I Was Told Nobody Is Perfect But Yet, Here I Am)
To: South40
Guess we can look forward to the gas station owner getting sued because he sold the gas to the guy that hit the car.
16 posted on
09/16/2014 4:15:30 PM PDT by
xrmusn
((6/98) If you can't convince them, confuse them.)
To: South40
ATTORNEYS ARE THE SCUM OF THE EARTH. AND THE JUDGES THAT ALLOW THESE BS CASES IN THEIR COURTROOMS ARE WORSE.
YES, I’M FED UP!!!
17 posted on
09/16/2014 4:16:28 PM PDT by
taillightchaser
(American media--public enemy #1)
To: South40
So... The gas station who sold gas for the car involved in a fatal collision should be responsible too???
18 posted on
09/16/2014 4:16:59 PM PDT by
babygene
( .)
To: South40
I see Jessica Ghawi’s mom on the local San Antonio news from time to time..IIRC, they are suing the Theater. The woman/mother is an embarrasment to the State of Texas. I want to tell her to STFU every time she spews her angst on the television.
20 posted on
09/16/2014 4:18:40 PM PDT by
sockmonkey
(Of course I didn't read the article. After all, this is Free Republic.)
To: South40
A legal product sold legally that performs as expected is not just cause for a lawsuit. The counter suit should be swiftly pressed forward. The distributor can only be found innocent...even if it take a trip to SCOTUS.
21 posted on
09/16/2014 4:18:57 PM PDT by
Vaquero
(Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
To: South40
...filed a lawsuit on Tuesday against four companies that sold the accused gunman James Holmes ammunition, body armor and other gear used in the massacre. So they keep saying BulkAmmo.com, but who are the other three? Also, as far as I know Holmes did not have body armor, he had a tactical vest. Even if it was body armor, how did that help facilitate the crime? The cops didn't show until it was over and the moviegoers were not allowed to be armed.
23 posted on
09/16/2014 4:22:57 PM PDT by
MileHi
To: South40
They’re still talking about ‘body armor’ I see.
24 posted on
09/16/2014 4:25:48 PM PDT by
lacrew
To: South40
“a patently dangerous homicidal man.”
Are they suing the State of Colorado for allowing this guy to roam freely?
26 posted on
09/16/2014 4:31:04 PM PDT by
Lurkina.n.Learnin
(It's a shame nobama truly doesn't care about any of this. Our country, our future, he doesn't care)
To: South40
Well hell, why not?
While we are at it, let's start suing the oil companies for selling the gasoline to drunk drivers using it to get to wherever they kill people.
To: South40
They know they don’t have a snowball’s chance in hell of winning. This is a malicious lawsuit intended to try to bankrupt the vendors.
32 posted on
09/16/2014 4:44:32 PM PDT by
Blood of Tyrants
(The cure has become worse than the disease. Support an end to the WOD now.)
To: South40
If this act of idiocy even makes it to court, I vote the parents be sued for allowing their daughter to go to the movies on that night.
34 posted on
09/16/2014 4:47:27 PM PDT by
RWB Patriot
("My ability is a value that must be earned and I don't recognize anyone's need as a claim on me.")
To: South40
What a goofy notion.
They should sue the company that mined the ore and made the steel used in the gun.
It makes just as much sense.
36 posted on
09/16/2014 4:52:55 PM PDT by
Iron Munro
("If you want to test a man's character, give him power." -- Abraham Lincoln)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson