Posted on 09/09/2014 8:00:31 AM PDT by wagglebee
For too long we have been lied to about the sexual revolution. But now the mask is coming off, and the younger generations are recognizing that they have been sold a pack of lies.
It’s sobering and frustrating to consider that each and every time social conservatives raised the cultural alarm throughout the last five decades, pointing out that each new manifestation of the Sexual Revolution would lead to devastating consequences, they were written off with derisive laughter. They were accused of “provoking a moral panic,” or being “stuck in the past” or “too prudish.” The “slippery-slope” arguments of aging moralists were simply dogmatic hysterics to be ignored, if not mocked.
Unfortunately, the briefest of cultural overviews reveals that those who sounded the alarm were not crackpots, but prophets.
More than 25 new categories of sexually transmitted diseases (now referred to as “sexually transmitted infections” in order to make them sound less permanent)? Check.
Regular, government-funded nude and sexually explicit frolics in the streets of our biggest cities? Check (and if you don’t go, you’re a bigot).
Soaring rates of pornography addiction that has now ensnared the majority of our population and is creating an insidious new rape culture emanating from the screens of our computers and smartphones? Check.
Millions upon millions of tiny human beings suctioned, shredded, dismembered, and burned to death in the name of “freedom”—the human cost of allowing us to copulate without consequence? Check.
While there are many depressing trends that we need to fight, one trend that it is encouraging is the number of people who have realized that the Sexual Revolution sold them a pack of lies.
And I could go on. But these sobering facts beg a very good question—how can the pro-life movement expect to impact, much less change, a culture that has gone so far?
The answer to that question, as I’ve seen in hundreds of personal conversations with high school students and university students, is that the truth eventually seeps in. There’s a reason that the current hyper-cynical, often nihilistic “Family Guy generation” responds so well to the pro-life message when we arrive at their high schools: When we tell them they’ve been lied to, they already know that. They’re just not sure how.
This is a generation that has never known what came before the Sexual Revolution. They weren’t part of the massive cultural shifts that resulted in the mainstreaming of pornography, hook-up culture, and abortion. It was simply bequeathed to them as their dubious inheritance.
And I say “dubious” for a reason—when you talk to a girl who had an abortion at 13 and was told by her mother or school nurse that it was “no big deal,” she knows she was lied to. When you tell a guy who has been hooked on porn since he was 10 and has never had a sexual experience that was not defined by that addiction that he’s been lied to, and that porn has changed him, he knows you’re telling the truth.
Teenagers dislike being lied to by adults, and when we confront them with reality, they realize very quickly that much of what they believed was nothing less than a failed cultural experiment.
Even mainstream media publications are slowly but surely admitting what social conservatives have said all along. Publications from The Atlantic to The New York Times to The Daily Mail are all admitting that pornography is warping the minds of the youth, creating situations in which girls are being coerced into sex acts they do not want to perform, impacting the ability of boys and girls to emotionally bond, and, bizarrely, rendering many boys and men sexually impotent.
The anti-porn movement has now driven an enormous wedge between those feminists and secularists who are honest about the damage porn has caused, and the Sexual Revolutionaries who are determined to defend every insidious and excessive manifestation of sexual “freedom.” After all, once we admit that certain behaviours are damaging and wrong, what’s stopping us from re-examining the whole bloody experiment?
The same goes for hook-up culture. Hannah Rosin of Slate, while ostensibly supportive of hook-up culture, was forced to admit in her recent book The End of Men that what many sexually-experienced university students wanted at the end of the day was just to go out on a romantic dinner date—an “experiment” that some of them had never tried.
TIME magazine released an article some time ago titled “The Hook-Up Culture Hurts Boys, Too”—tacitly admitting that the reality of hook-up culture hurting girls now just goes without saying. And while the Sexual Revolutionaries accuse social conservatives of being “anti-sex,” it is their ideology that has profoundly undervalued, debased, and degraded this most intimate of human experiences.
In fact, when a professor named Chap Clark set out to find the story behind the statistics of sex in high schools, he was shocked by what he found: “I was surprised to realize that for most mid-adolescents the issue of sex had lost its mystique and has become almost commonplace. They have been conditioned to expect so much from sex and have been so tainted by overexposure... as one student told me, ‘sex is a game and a toy, nothing more.’”
While there are many depressing trends that we need to fight, one trend that it is encouraging is the number of people who have realized that the Sexual Revolution sold them a pack of lies. The controversial actor and comedian Gavin McInnis, for instance, realized that everything he’d been told about abortion was wrong when he saw his wife give birth. I interviewed him some time ago, and he told me that he’s not the only one:
I think that the liberal world is realizing that, as I did, that it just doesn't add up. And I think the world is catching on. You can check the internet, but that's because the only place these liberal graduates, these liberalized graduates have to go, is the internet. So they spill out, and lost logic is seeping in. I was just at a conference, in Palm Beach this weekend, called Restoration, and there was a lot of old conservatives, and they were really negative, and they've given up. And I just kept saying to them, ‘Guys, the truth is seeping in. And the children in the information age, the really young kids, they don't believe all this.’ And I also noticed it with abortion. Like you have punks for the first time carrying pro-life signs, and you have bands like Flat Foot 56 being ‘Be a man, don't be a quitter, just because the child's within her.’ And I think that it's changing.
In many ways, it is. When we approach the youth of our culture today, we’re not telling them what might happen as the result of the Sexual Revolution, we’re telling them what has happened—and how to avoid those consequences themselves. We now know that the free love utopia promised by hedonistic academics and drugged-up hippies was as illusory as their narcotic-induced hallucinations. All we have to do is show them the half-century report card and ask them questions—ask them if porn and hook-up culture and abortion has made them happy. Our society has confused pleasure with happiness for too long, and now that we’ve gotten a good look at the fall-out, many people are rediscovering age-old truths that our culture abandoned on the ill-fated whim of those who thought to justify their own desires.
And yet, the truth seeps in. I know I’ve quoted this poem before, but Arthur Hugh Clough says it so beautifully:
For while the tired waves, vainly breaking,
Seem here no painful inch to gain,
Far back, through creeks and inlets making,
Comes silent, flooding in, the main.
Re post 5. WTF is that? A man?
Really? When? Who will lead it? NO ONE, that’s who. It will be a Twitter, Facebook, Pinterest quasi-cyber revolt (those three are already revolting, IMO).
That was my conclusion.
I didn’t quite follow this sentence: “I was always amazed about how we got laws against domestic violence negating consent of the abused not applying to some of the vile sex acts depicted.”
I’m not sure which clauses go together there. Could you unpack that in a few sentences?
here’s the thread you mentioned...
Marxist Feminism’s Ruined Lives
Frontpagemag.com ^ | 9-2-2014 | Mallory Millett
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3200158/posts
It was 1969. Kate invited me to join her for a gathering at the home of her friend, Lila Karp. They called the assemblage a “consciousness-raising-group,” a typical communist exercise, something practiced in Maoist China. We gathered at a large table as the chairperson opened the meeting with a back-and-forth recitation, like a Litany, a type of prayer done in Catholic Church. But now it was Marxism, the Church of the Left, mimicking religious practice:
“Why are we here today?” she asked.
“To make revolution,” they answered.
“What kind of revolution?” she replied.
“The Cultural Revolution,” they chanted.
“And how do we make Cultural Revolution?” she demanded.
“By destroying the American family!” they answered.
“How do we destroy the family?” she came back.
“By destroying the American Patriarch,” they cried exuberantly.
“And how do we destroy the American Patriarch?” she replied.
“By taking away his power!”
“How do we do that?”
“By destroying monogamy!” they shouted.
“How can we destroy monogamy?”
Their answer left me dumbstruck, breathless, disbelieving my ears. Was I on planet earth? Who were these people?
“By promoting promiscuity, eroticism, prostitution and homosexuality!” they resounded.
They proceeded with a long discussion on how to advance these goals by establishing The National Organization of Women. It was clear they desired nothing less than the utter deconstruction of Western society. The upshot was that the only way to do this was “to invade every American institution. Every one must be permeated with ‘The Revolution’”: The media, the educational system, universities, high schools, K-12, school boards, etc.; then, the judiciary, the legislatures, the executive branches and even the library system.
It fell on my ears as a ludicrous scheme, as if they were a band of highly imaginative children planning a Brinks robbery; a lark trumped up on a snowy night amongst a group of spoiled brats over booze and hashish.
I was always amazed about how we have laws against domestic violence negating testimonies including the consent/recant stories of the abused, but that the blatant pictorial evidence in porn is not used to prosecute some of the vile sex acts depicted.
Again, abortion culture favors pimps. Supposedly she is not a dependent when doing pornographic acts... it is her free will... and that marriage is not empowering her to free will.
I say bull sht on that.
We know a government tyranny is favored in that set up.
Untrue. The concept originated in the 1330s with Petrarch and was well developed by humanists in the Renaissance before the Reformers came along.
The idea is self-flattering, of course, as it refers to the "dark" period between classical civilization and its rebirth, midwived by the humanists, in the Renaissance.
The term itself was invented by Baronius, a Catholic historian, around 1600. "The new age (saeculum) which was beginning, for its harshness and barrenness of good could well be called iron, for its baseness and abounding evil leaden, and moreover for its lack of writers (inopia scriptorum) dark (obscurum)."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_Ages_(historiography)
That was just last century but even hundreds of years ago it was the same, sexual degeneracy and leftism went hand in hand.
How do the laws against domestic violence negate testimonies?
Indeed. It is not a new thing. I believe in the time of Plato groups blaming money and dreaming of a moneyless businessless society such as these were depicted.
Thats it! Thanks!
Bookmark
The jury is asked by the prosecution and judge to invariably ignore the abused woman’s story when she says she was the one attacking or when she changes her story.
Domestic violence laws which make the State the plaintiff bypassing the need to wait for the woman to bring up charges has essentially taken women into their direct custody, but not so when the woman is having abortions or doing stuff “on her own” outside marriage.
Why, the State counts on its welfare recipients to be its dependents, providing them through the pimps their sexual needs and repressed life as low level animals in need.
The Pill kicked it into overdrive but falsified research “studies” by Kinsey, Reich, Mead, and others gave “scientific permission” to cast off Western civilization’s moral code.
The problem is that there really are women who participate freely in such activities. I'm sure many of them are severely messed up emotionally and mentally, but the government just isn't qualified to override a person's statement and determine that her actions aren't "really" consensual.
If you don't believe me, the evidence is remarkably easy to find. Some of the tamer stuff can be found in discussions of "domestic discipline," many of the blogs by women who approach the subject from the idea that it's an application of Christian principles of headship.
From there, it heads off into some really, really dark stuff. It appears, surprisingly, that there are a lot more people who want to be sexually dominated and abused than there are people who want to do the dominating. Hence a thriving and profitable market for the professional dominatrix.
Should also have mentioned the astonishing success of 50 Shades of Grey, S&M porn that isn’t even very well written.
Almost entirely among women. It very obviously strikes a deep chord in many of them.
Some coincide it with the degradation occuring after the rise of Islam.
How does Planned Parenthood defend teaching BDSM concept to minors including “safe words because ‘no’ doesn’t ALWAYS REALLY mean ‘NO!’”?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.