The man is a very bad joke.
Further proof that the word “Nobel”, when associated with anything other than the STEM subjects, is a complete joke.
Krugman wants us to return 1929.
Another dog whistle to Democrat voters.
We want to end women’s sufferage, reinstate Jim Crow, and send twelve-year olds back out to sort coal 14 hours a day.
I prefer 1863. Women knew their place, coloreds were more respectful, and the Confederate States of America still stood a chance of winning.
Oh, and it was still legal to beat a Nancy-boy like Paul Krugman to within an inch of his life.
If corporations aren’t people, you can’t tax them. Gosh, liberals hate that when you bring it up while they’re spouting off about the Citizens United decision.
Heck, won’t find any argument from me; end all corporate taxes and all corporate and union donations.
‘course, liberals just want what THEY want, not what, you know, is lawful.
If a corporation formed by people called corporate stockholders should not be considered a person, why should a union formed by people called union members be considered a person?
He sits on the Iron Throne of Idiocy.
Actually, we want to pull the country back to 1984. High growth, low unemployment, low taxes, strong defense and optimism about our future.
How about we ‘pull back’ to 1791?
The overwhelming majority of stuff that the US government does is a complete violation of the Constitution.
Big Brother Barry wants to keep us in 1984.
1894, when the main objective of the Democrats in Congress was protecting Southern state Jim Crow laws and trying to create a national set of Jim Crow laws for the federal government. Which they finally were able to do under President Wilson.
I’d settle for 1906...
Keep the Marxists in charge another 10 years and we will look more like 1464.
Pray America wakes up
1894 was a damn good year. We were coming out of the Panic of 93, thanks to J. P. Morgan; a GREAT constitutional president, Grover Cleveland (the last good Democrat) was in power; and the US was building the second largest navy in the world.
I’m not going to read anything by Krugman, but if he is referring to Plessy v. Ferguson (ironic case name, huh?), which established “separate but equal” as constitutional, then it was in force until 1954, when Republican judges led the way to getting rid of it, during a Republican administration. Anyone wanting to go back to that would want to go back to 1954. Of course, the only ones who EVER wanted separate but equal were Democrats. No Republicans then or now supported it.
If only!
Well, to be fair, the democrats want to put us back to ‘1984’.
Had he said “1984” (the year, not the book), I might not disagree. I’d love to return to 1984. I had a great time.
Meanwhile, the Democrats want to push us to 1958 - Russia, 1958.
How about 1789, constitutionally speaking?