BREAKING REPORT – Dorian Johnson Recants Media Statement ?

The Conservative Treehouse ^ | 8-19-2014 | sundance

[sheikdetailfeather]

Bear with us – and proceed with caution – as we give you breaking news and source out the information:

[yldstrk]

no I won’t. I fully blame the police for not coming forth immediately with the officer’s name and what the hell happened

[dragnet2]

BTW, I think he’ll need to recant what he told the media anyway, due to the fact they’ll impeach him quickly in a court based on physical evidence and witness/Wilson’s statements.

[BigEdLB]

If this is true, The Marxist-Socialist Gubbenore would be forced to resign.

i.e.
Gov Jay Nixon

[Aurorales]

Bookmark

[Syncro]

The warrant is old news, though.

Why report it again now?

Yea why bring it up now...now that it has greater relevancy.

First time many of us have heard of it, even with reading most of the threads here.

Old news lol...this story is only a bit over a week old!

[sheikdetailfeather]

Gov. Nixon is a disgrace!

[matt04]

I’ve noticed that also. Many will have the long luslim style beard.

[Mr Ramsbotham]

One very small thing that leads me to believe there may be some truth to this, is that Johnson put the cigars back on the counter (the ones handed to him by the Gentle Giant). It is an act of someone who is not fully on board with the feral mindset, but who has some deeper sense of right and wrong (or, at least, a desire to not go to prison).

Looking at the grainy video, it appears that he's holding something in his right hand, even though you can't see it. Saint Swisher Sweet actually seized more of the cigars than he could hold on the second "grab," and you see him trying to gather the ones that have fallen off the floor. We can't tell if he handed some of those off to Johnson, because the camera doesn't cover it. At any rate, when he (SSS) leaves the store, he's only got one hand full.

[jjsheridan5]

LOL. So the police, in the middle of difficult investigation, under extreme political pressure from above, and from the public, are supposed to cater to what you believe the timetable should be, even though you have absolutely no idea, at all, of what they are actually doing behind the scenes. You have no idea why they chose not to not make certain information public. But you don’t care. Because, you, the timetable king, have decided that your demands are more important than the demand for an objective and thorough investigation, which happens to be their real job.

So you absolve the media, the race pimps, and the useful idiots, of all of the guilt. It is now, in your eyes, the job of the police to jeopardize what they are doing, in order to shape public opinion.

It isn’t the media’s fault, for constantly spewing incendiary reports, even though there was almost no justification. It isn’t the race pimps’ fault, for saying whatever they need to, leaving beyond a wake of ruined lives, all because they are too stupid to make money in any honest fashion. It isn’t the useful idiot’s fault, who ignore any evidence which doesn’t fit into their juvenile fantasies.

No, you assign the blame to the one entity here who actually has a productive job to do, a job which is usually not helped by leaking information to the public. This entity, which you blame, is facing an avalanche of lawsuits should the so much as fail to dot an “i”, yet they must abide to your sense of timing, or they risk being blamed by armchair quarterbacks like yourself.

You are wrong.

[cynwoody]

Ask your lawyer here if that’s correct.

Dorian's lawyer is Freeman Bosley, Jr., the first black mayor of St. Louis (1993 to 1997).

[South40]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sZfZ8uWaOFI

I'm not buying it.

[BigEdLB]

Aliases? U B Talkin Altered Social Secirity Numbers? : Dat B Rayschus

[Political Junkie Too]

The cop is innocent but must be made a scapegoat.

In order to protect the high stations of the elite in the country.

Yes, just like the Dreyfuss affair. But who will be today's Zola? And Zola was later assassinated by carbon monoxide poisoning.

-PJ

[yldstrk]

I tell you what, bub, in every other city in the country they immediately announce the name of the policeman who shot and that they are an admin leave awaiting investigation. I am right.

[is_is]

you don’t spend much time with the section 8 crowd do you???......they ain’t the mob......

[ArmstedFragg]

Hearsay twice removed so far. Radio station employee who heard it from someone in the media who’s “well connected”. I’m not popping any corks yet either.

The obvious question is: if this source is high-up in the national media, why hasn’t he broken the story yet?

[TigerClaws]

The media is rooting for prosecution.

Conservative media knows to be super cautious.

Right now it’s just rumor, but it’s a likely scenario if that ‘12 witnesses back cop’ rumor from yesterday is accurate.

[Political Junkie Too]

...Dorian Johnson the kid who was with Brown and started the lies of the hands up, has taken a plea deal. His involvement in the apparent robbery that resulted in browns death and all the riots and damage can be charged to him.

Good. That's what I've been saying for the past two days.

-PJ

[jjsheridan5]

I tell you what, bub, in every other city in the country they immediately announce the name of the policeman who shot and that they are an admin leave awaiting investigation. I am right.

But they don't reveal details during an investigation, unless it helps advance the investigation, or it holding onto the information becomes no longer necessary. Your "counter-point" (I am using quotes, because it was such a weak counter), only posits that the name is released. Not that they start releasing other information that is actually applicable to the investigation. So you completely miss the point.

But you don't even try to address the bigger point, which is: what do you know, about this specific investigation, that enables you to be able to play armchair quarterback? Do you know why they didn't release more information? I don't. And if you don't, you have no justification to say that it was an error.

But the bigger problem is that you choose to blame the police, when it is clearly the fault of the media, and others, for fanning the flames, even though they didn't have any real basis to do so.

You are not right. At all. Now if it turns out that the police' rationale for withholding information was insufficient, then, yes, the police will have made a mistake. But there is no way, at all, that you can know that, given what we know now.

[Brad from Tennessee]

[Remember the ghetto creed, snitches get stitches.]

In the rural area where I live it's “snitches end up in ditches.”