Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Barton J. Bernstein: American conservatives are the forgotten critics of the atomic bombing of Japan
San Jose Mercury News ^ | Agust 2, 2014 | Barton J. Bernstein

Posted on 08/06/2014 2:28:23 AM PDT by No One Special

"The use of the atomic bomb, with its indiscriminate killing of women and children, revolts my soul," he wrote. "The only difference between this and the use of gas (which President Franklin D. Roosevelt had barred as a first-use weapon in World War II) is the fear of retaliation."

Those harsh words, written three days after the Hiroshima bombing in August, 1945, were not by a man of the American left, but rather by a very prominent conservative -- former President Herbert Hoover, a foe of the New Deal and Fair Deal.

In 1959, Medford Evans, a conservative writing in William Buckley's strongly nationalistic, energetically right-wing magazine, National Review, stated: "The indefensibility of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima is becoming a part of the national conservative creed." Just the year before, the National Review had featured an angry, anti-atomic bomb article, "Hiroshima: Assault on a Beaten Foe." Like Hoover, that 1958 essay had decried the atomic bombing as wanton murder. National Review's editors, impressed by that article, had offered special reprints.

Those two sets of events --Hoover in 1945 and National Review in 1968-69 -- were not anomalies in early post-Hiroshima U.S. conservatism. In fact, many noted American conservatives -- journalists, former diplomats and retired and occasionally on-duty military officers, and some right-wing historians and political scientists -- criticized the atomic bombing. They frequently contended it was unnecessary, and often maintained it was immoral and that softer surrender terms could have ended the war without such mass killing. They sometimes charged Truman and the atomic bombing with "criminality" and "slaughter."

Yet today, this history of early anti-A-bomb dissent by conservatives is largely unknown. In about the past 20 years, various American conservatives have even assailed A-bomb dissent as typically leftist and anti-American, and as having begun...

(Excerpt) Read more at mercurynews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial
KEYWORDS: atomicbomb; bartonjbernstein; handwringing; hiroshima; revisionisthistory
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last
To: No One Special
Pearl Harbor. Guadalcanal. Tarawa. Peleliu. Marianas. Okinawa (to name a few).

Hiroshima and Nagasaki were easy decisions and absolutely the right ones under the circumstances. Screw what liberals spew as "history".

21 posted on 08/06/2014 3:54:17 AM PDT by TADSLOS (The Event Horizon has come and gone. Buckle up and hang on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
My dad served in Europe and North Africa. He had orders for the Pacific theater, but as he and the other men were about to ship out, the bomb was dropped, the war was over and obviously, Dad and his unit were spared from having to fight over there. His brother was already on the ship headed for the Philippines. Then the order came to turn back — the war was over.

My parents and relatives from that generation always credited President Truman with making the difficult and necessary decision to drop the bomb. As a result, many GI lives were saved.

Ok, Truman was a Democrat. But unlike the pseudo Democrat (communist) in the White House today, Truman could make the hard decisions without worrying about what do-gooders and other whiners think.

22 posted on 08/06/2014 3:59:05 AM PDT by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy

Roosevelt was a Democrat too. One can say lots of bad things about Roosevelt, but he wanted us to win the war, unlike certain contemporary Democrats we could mention.


23 posted on 08/06/2014 4:00:52 AM PDT by Tax-chick (No power in the 'verse can stop me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Politicalkiddo

They weren’t military properties; they were selected because the few planes Japan had left wouldn’t be defending them.


24 posted on 08/06/2014 4:01:07 AM PDT by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ArtDodger

Clearly if the bombs in Japan were “crimes” and akin to dousing people with gasoline, then the “American conservative nationalist right” (all terms used by the author in this liberal handwringing piece) must’ve LED the “ban the bomb” movement, right?


25 posted on 08/06/2014 4:04:55 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (CNN suppressed news to maintain their Baghdad bureau under Saddam; they just did the same for Hamas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan

What Truman did was not a crime.


26 posted on 08/06/2014 4:13:41 AM PDT by ohioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: No One Special
indiscriminate killing

According to libtardism discrimination is immoral. Bombs should not discriminate but treat everyone equally.

27 posted on 08/06/2014 4:19:35 AM PDT by Reeses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No One Special
I can't root through my bookshelf from here, but I have one history book at home where two Japanese historians concur that the bomb was the best solution at the time.
28 posted on 08/06/2014 4:40:05 AM PDT by CrazyIvan (I lost my phased plasma rifle in a tragic hovercraft accident.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
In those days Democrats were the typical tax and spend, social justice types, but in a war you could count on them to lead. Democrats were patriots.

My parents and most of their generation in this town were committed, lifelong Democrats. They've passed on, but I wonder if they would still embrace the Democrats today. I think they would be appalled by the pressure to accept every perversion as normal and would be unhappy with the utter lack of leadership. I know they wouldn't be happy with the politically correct girly man occupying the White House today.

29 posted on 08/06/2014 4:54:38 AM PDT by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy

My relatives in Missouri abandoned the Democrats in the Clinton years.


30 posted on 08/06/2014 5:00:02 AM PDT by Tax-chick (No power in the 'verse can stop me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: No One Special

Author is a blooming idjit

it would have cost a million US soldiers to invade Japan

don’t want collateral damage?

don’t start a war


31 posted on 08/06/2014 5:09:36 AM PDT by yldstrk ( My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No One Special

I can’t celebrate the deaths of hundreds of thousands of non-combatants but I accept its clear necessity. Truman, the last decent democrat to hold the Oval Office made the right call. I hope he came to peace with his unavoidable decision. It was the right thing to do but it was still horrible.


32 posted on 08/06/2014 5:52:58 AM PDT by muir_redwoods (When I first read it, " Atlas Shrugged" was fiction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No One Special

The battle for Okinawa lasted 82 days (April - June 1945). The Allies had about 14,000 deaths (with an estimated total of more than 65,000 casualties). Japan had about 77,000 casualties. Some sources say that 100,000 - 150,000 local civilians were killed or committed suicide.

These losses on Okinawa were a big factor in Truman’s decision to use Little Boy (Hiroshima) and Fat Man (Nagasaki).


33 posted on 08/06/2014 5:56:41 AM PDT by DFG ("Dumb, Dependent, and Democrat is no way to go through life" - Louie Gohmert (R-TX))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No One Special

If Hoover had kids who would have had to invade Japan, I’d bet his opinion would’ve been different.


34 posted on 08/06/2014 6:13:29 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg

FDR basically continued Hoover’s policies, and stuck his own label on them.


35 posted on 08/06/2014 6:14:30 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: muir_redwoods

The deaths are on the hands of Tojo and Company.


36 posted on 08/06/2014 6:15:03 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: No One Special
Herbert Hoover + Limited Government ("Conservative") =

Barton J. Bernstein (Pictured here on his favorite "stuff")


37 posted on 08/06/2014 6:22:02 AM PDT by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onedoug

Those kids also probably would have had to stay in Japan to fight the Communist “North Japan” Army.


38 posted on 08/06/2014 6:25:27 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: ArtDodger
We had three.

And we were getting the third bomb ready to go when Japan finally decided that life was better then death.

By the time November rolled around we would have had bombs coming off the line pretty steadily and we would have used them.

You have only to visit Shuri Castle in Okinawa to understand why. You will see pegs in the wall about knee and ankle height that what was left after the bombing. And the commander still would not surrender.

39 posted on 08/06/2014 6:25:29 AM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (Proud Infidel, Gun Nut, Religious Fanatic and Freedom Fiend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

And they only surrendered after Hirohito went on the radio and expressed the desire to surrender.

He almost didn’t live to make that broadcast.


40 posted on 08/06/2014 6:26:39 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson