Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Atheists Have To Offer The Right
The Federalist ^ | August 5, 2014 | Robert Tracinski

Posted on 08/05/2014 9:49:44 AM PDT by EveningStar

Conservative writer and CNN talking head S.E. Cupp recently put out a video describing how she has been welcomed among conservatives even though she is an atheist. This led Hot Air's Allahpundit to chime in with his own experiences, citing myself and National Review's Charles Cooke as other examples of atheists on the Right. And we're not the only ones. There's Heather Mac Donald and Walter Olson, and a whole website devoted to the issue. Among marquee names, there are a few famous agnostics/atheists like Charles Krauthammer and George Will.

When you start looking, we're everywhere.

I pretty much agree with Cupp about not feeling excluded. Heck, The Federalist even encourages me to comment on the Bible from an unbeliever's perspective. Yes, I get a fair number of readers who disagree with me, but as a general rule Christians tend to be annoyingly nice critics. Environmentalists will tell me they wish I would die; Christians tell me they're praying for me. I try to return the favor by not demonizing Christians, so to speak, in the way that the Richard Dawkins "New Atheist" crowd does.

(Excerpt) Read more at thefederalist.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: atheism; atheists; conservatism; poop; roberttracinski; theright
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
I could never be an atheist, but I did find this article to be interesting.
1 posted on 08/05/2014 9:49:44 AM PDT by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
One of the problems with citing a religious foundation for freedom and Americanism is that these arguments tend not to appeal to those who don’t share your faith.

Unfortunately for this guy's thesis is there is a religious foundation for our freedom and Americansim.

It sounds as though he really has a problem with co-existing with this reality. Why can't he/they just be content to enjoy those freedoms, which hold that you don't have to be a Christian to benefit from our system?

2 posted on 08/05/2014 9:56:24 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

One of the differences I’ve long noted between leftists and constitutionalists (”liberal” and “conservative” don’t mean much anymore) is that those on the left demand lock-step agreement on all issues and constitutionalsts tend to enjoy the areas where we agree and ignore those areas where we disagree. I know few people on the right who would disavow someone on the basis of religion alone. In this crowd, Jews, Catholics, Baptists and others seem to be more interested in what’s held in common than in seething over differences. Usually.


3 posted on 08/05/2014 10:00:31 AM PDT by muir_redwoods (When I first read it, " Atlas Shrugged" was fiction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
...as a general rule Christians tend to be annoyingly nice critics

Count me as an annoyingly nice critic.

4 posted on 08/05/2014 10:10:44 AM PDT by celmak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

Tempatation.


5 posted on 08/05/2014 10:12:19 AM PDT by PieterCasparzen (We have to fix things ourselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

I don’t mind atheists as long as they mind their own business and don’t promote it as if it were a religion.


6 posted on 08/05/2014 10:13:19 AM PDT by cripplecreek ("Moderates" are lying manipulative bottom feeding scum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

What atheists have to offer the right? They are wrong about fewer things than Obama is?


7 posted on 08/05/2014 10:17:39 AM PDT by Hugh the Scot ( Total War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
Unfortunately for this guy's thesis is there is a religious foundation for our freedom and Americansim. It sounds as though he really has a problem with co-existing with this reality.

"He" is a she.

8 posted on 08/05/2014 10:22:08 AM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hugh the Scot
What atheists have to offer the right? They are wrong about fewer things than Obama is?

Try reading the article. She makes some good points.

9 posted on 08/05/2014 10:23:16 AM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Hugh the Scot
What atheists have to offer the right? They are wrong about fewer things than Obama is?

Try reading the article. She makes some good points.

10 posted on 08/05/2014 10:23:16 AM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian
"He" is a she.

It's Jake from State Farm!

11 posted on 08/05/2014 10:23:49 AM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion ( "I didn't leave the Central Oligarchy Party. It left me." - Ronaldus Maximus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

Then Robert’s parents have played a cruel joke on her.


12 posted on 08/05/2014 10:27:53 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
You're right, Robert is a he. It's S.E. Cupp who's the she:


13 posted on 08/05/2014 10:30:32 AM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

Yes, he wrote the piece based upon her comments.


14 posted on 08/05/2014 10:33:53 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

My mistake.


15 posted on 08/05/2014 10:36:43 AM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

Without belief in God there can be no rational basis for a belief in individual liberty.

This demonstrates atheistic conservatism to be logically incoherent.


16 posted on 08/05/2014 10:37:47 AM PDT by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

I don’t care what you people say about an athiest. I’d have her calling out for God in six minutes. Not guilty!


17 posted on 08/05/2014 10:38:29 AM PDT by Safetgiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith

Well said.


18 posted on 08/05/2014 10:41:03 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

You have a god if you have a truth you seek to follow.. so are you really an atheist?


19 posted on 08/05/2014 10:58:53 AM PDT by tophat9000 (An Eye for an Eye, a Word for a Word...nothing more)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith

exactly right.


20 posted on 08/05/2014 11:00:20 AM PDT by dadfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson