Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anti-Tank Missiles Deflected by New Israeli Defense System
The Washington Free Beacon ^ | Thursday, July 24, 2014 | Abraham Rabinovich

Posted on 07/25/2014 3:26:10 AM PDT by Star Traveler

JERUSALEM–At least five times in the past week in Gaza, Israeli tanks equipped with a revolutionary defense system have deflected anti-tank missiles fired at them by Hamas fighters, according to the Israeli army.

The success of the Windbreaker system, as it is called in Israel, augments on the ground the technological achievement in the air of the Iron Dome anti-rocket defense system which Israel credits with neutralizing the intensive rocketing from Gaza of the past two weeks.

The Windbreaker system (known abroad as Trophy), which became operational in 2009, has since been successfully tested by live fire twice when Israeli tank patrols on the periphery of Gaza were fired on two years ago. The current Gaza campaign is the first time the system is being tested in a face-to-face war against advanced Russian anti-tank rockets. In the 2006 Lebanon War against Hezbollah, missiles penetrated 22 Israeli tanks, destroying several.

Installed on Israel’s most-advanced tank, the Merkava 1V, the system’s sensors instantly identify a rocket or RPG heading toward it. Without intervention of the crew, the system fires pellets that detonate the rocket at a safe distance from the tank. It also informs the crew of the location from which the incoming rocket was launched, permitting counter-fire.

(Excerpt) Read more at freebeacon.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Israel; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: hamas; israel
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last
Israel has some great technological developments in defending themselves from these rabid terrorists.
1 posted on 07/25/2014 3:26:10 AM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

Coming to an M1A2 near you...


2 posted on 07/25/2014 3:53:57 AM PDT by Thunder90 (All posts soley represent my own opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thunder90

Hopefully.
Wonder if it would work on helicopters? Sounds feasible to me.


3 posted on 07/25/2014 4:03:05 AM PDT by Vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Thunder90

“Star Wars” stuff. Too bad they couldn’t figure out how to
explode those rockets just as they are fired, might save a lot more lives after taking out the missile firing crews.


4 posted on 07/25/2014 4:04:41 AM PDT by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Vinnie

Trophy is a very heavy system in terms of weight. Probably not coming for choppers soon, but maybe someday.

Also, this idea probably came from David Drake’s Hammer’s Slammers series, written beginning in the 70s. Hovertanks had belts of what was basically claymore mines around them and would automatically fire off a short segment in the closest belt to sweep RPGs and missiles out of the sky prior to them hitting. Trophy sounds like the same thing.


5 posted on 07/25/2014 4:10:21 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: All

when will the “Palestinians” ever tire of living like rats running through rubble?


6 posted on 07/25/2014 4:15:04 AM PDT by newnhdad (Our new motto: USA, it was fun while it lasted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

OUTSTANDING!


7 posted on 07/25/2014 4:35:13 AM PDT by grobdriver (Where is Wilson Blair when you need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thunder90

Assuming any Abrams tanks will be left operating after the regime is done.


8 posted on 07/25/2014 4:38:46 AM PDT by wally_bert (There are no winners in a game of losers. I'm Tommy Joyce, welcome to the Oriental Lounge.q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

Headlines from Gaza:

Windbreaker Makes Hamas Break Wind


9 posted on 07/25/2014 4:56:17 AM PDT by bunkerhill7 ("The Second Amendment has no limits n firepower"-NY State Senator Kathleen A. Marchione.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bunkerhill7

LOL ...


10 posted on 07/25/2014 4:58:45 AM PDT by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

Unfortunately, despite Rafael’s claims to the contrary, the Trophy, aka Windbreaker, system has claimed the life of one Israeli solder; further, only one brigade (401st armored) of tanks has the system.

That said, the 401st is unstoppable, unless the politicians decide to pause, allowing Hamas time to regroup and come up with a defense against it.

Right now, the Israelis are apparently debating whether of not to go for a major effort to totally destroy Hamas’ underground command center in Gaza City - which would be spearheaded by the 401st after IDF victories in Shejaiya, E. Rafah and Khan Younes.


11 posted on 07/25/2014 5:00:18 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler; All
thanks, for the ping/post...

12 posted on 07/25/2014 5:00:43 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (The end move in politics is always to pick up a weapon...0'Bathhouse/"Rustler" Reid? d8-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

“the Windbreaker system...”

Great technology, I’m very happy they have it.

Sure reminds me of Spinal Tap’s second album: “Break Like The Wind.”


13 posted on 07/25/2014 5:08:31 AM PDT by BBB333 (Q: Which is grammatically correct? Joe Biden IS or Joe Biden ARE an idiot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler
The same sort of system is deployed to a limited extent on Russian tanks, apparently including a batch sold to India rather than being restricted to Russian military alone.

This is an old idea though really, seriously studied with various alternatives having been tested since the Yom Kippur War was analyzed at least. Sturdy, reliable, sensors and electronics having been the bottleneck until mid-eighties. At that point the cost per vehicle became the main consideration. It came down to money compared to how real the threat was considered to be and when the threat was real enough it was sure to be deployed by anyone would could afford it.

Russians have considered the threat very real since WWII but not so severe that it couldn't be defeated by having more infantry with their tanks. Urban warfare becoming more common rules that solution out to a degree, so they started extensive testing of such systems in the late eighties. The few tanks fitted with one of their systems performed well in Chechnya leading Russia to start widespread retrofitting albeit at a slow pace, or at least so I've heard.

There were multiple systems tested in both Russia and the US that I know of, probably in other countries as well. A friend in AL who works with the M1 says kits to fit a system like this to both the M1 and Bradley as well as M113s are already available but weather that means designed and tested or sitting in a warehouse waiting for the order to install them, I have no idea. Even reactive armor kits would be a major improvement on the M113. They melt like solder, splashing aluminum around when hit from an angle that isn't lethal (given the fact they're a shoebox, it's surprising how often they were hit from a bad angle in VN and not penetrated)

Obviously Israel can do what we and the Russians can when it comes to armor and most other weapons systems as long as they're willing to spend the money. The Russian system is known to work and work well it's just not been deployed to any great extent. Whether their system can be easily fitted to APCs and such, I don't know.

14 posted on 07/25/2014 5:12:19 AM PDT by Rashputin (Jesus Christ doesn't evacuate His troops, He leads them to victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaveA37
Too bad they couldn’t figure out how to explode those rockets just as they are fired,

The U.S. in Iraq managed to light off some remote controlled IED's using something like a garage door opener. When the Iranians switched to coded ones, at least we could jam them. There were reports of suicide bombers having their charges lit off long before they go in range of U.S. forces. I love premature detonation.

Just hope this technology gets into U.S. systems soon.

15 posted on 07/25/2014 5:28:29 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (This is known as "bad luck". - Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

And believe it or not, this administration wants to give Qatar — al Qaeda friendly Qatar — our Javelin, anti-tank, fire-and-forget, missile system.

I read that last week, I think, and I nearly choked.

With that system, counter fire is much less significant because the shooter can shoot and run.


16 posted on 07/25/2014 5:38:27 AM PDT by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

The next American president along with Israel and the entire west should stop all TV broadcasts in Islamic countries and cut in with a “commercial” that runs 24/7 for a week. The “commercial” would tell them that unless all terrorist activity is stopped Mecca will be destroyed. End the “commercial” with an image of a thermonuclear device going off, mushroom cloud and all.

The response would be that zillions of islamists would go to Mecca to stand around and scream and holler. Fine, but keep to the plan...


17 posted on 07/25/2014 5:43:09 AM PDT by isthisnickcool (NO MORE IRS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Caches of MANPADS have been smuggled in to the US for years. Odds are that some morning we will wake up and see commercial airliners failing out of the sky by an air port near you.


18 posted on 07/25/2014 5:44:31 AM PDT by isthisnickcool (NO MORE IRS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

Yeah, reactive ablative armor was around before that was written. He just made it actively fused rather than reactive.


19 posted on 07/25/2014 6:02:56 AM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wally_bert

Oh, I’m sure there will be plenty of Abrams around - only ISIS will be driving most of them, with a few in Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and in other Muslim enclaves around the globe.

Our advanced military technology seems to keep mysteriously migrating into Islamist’s hands while our military is systematically degraded and purged of it’s leadership.


20 posted on 07/25/2014 6:05:55 AM PDT by George Varnum (Isaiah 5:20 Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson