Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Man Kills His Unborn Child By Tricking Girlfriend Into Taking Abortion Drug in Her Pancakes
Life News ^ | July 14, 2014 | Sarah Terzo

Posted on 07/14/2014 2:54:37 PM PDT by NYer

Four months after a New York man was arrested for slipping abortion pills into his girlfriend’s body after sex, causing the death of the couple’s unborn child, another man is being tried for a similar crime.

A Kansas man has killed his girlfriend’s unborn baby by crushing up an abortion causing drug and baking it into a pancake, which he then gave to her to eat. 30-year-old Scott Bollig is being held for trial after two days of preliminary hearings.

pancake

Police say that the drug involved is mifepristone. Mifepristone, sometimes referred to as RU-486, is commonly given in abortion clinics to kill developing babies in the first trimester of pregnancy. It is usually used with a second drug, Misoprostol, which induces bleeding.

Bollig’s girlfriend, Naomi Abbott, miscarried on January 31, and doctors found traces of the mifepristone in her blood. When confronted, Bollig admitted to purchasing the drug over the Internet and using it to poison his girlfriend and her unborn baby.

He is being charged with battery and first-degree murder in the death of the child.

Bollig’s arrest was handled by the WaKeeney police force, and the crime took place near there. Had Abbott gotten in her car and driven for a little less than three hours into the city of Wichita, she could have legally obtained the drugs to cause her own abortion.

However, because the baby was killed against her will outside of a medical setting, the charge is first-degree murder. In this case, whether or not a baby is wanted by his mother determines whether the child’s death is murder or a simple medical procedure.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; US: Kansas
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: NorthMountain

exactly. it’s extremely hypocritical of libs not to recognize this.


21 posted on 07/14/2014 3:40:22 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man ( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AHerald

“The law is an ass’


The law is a typical irrational, liberal law. It is written with a woman’s emotions in mind rather than the scientific truth of a new human being forming inside the Mother’s body.

The more irrational liberal mind-set is that they accuse Conservatives of not being scientifically minded.


22 posted on 07/14/2014 3:44:40 PM PDT by Gumdrop (~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
So then, if the woman wants her baby, then the law treats an event which causes death of her baby as murder or homicide. But if she doesn’t want the baby, then that same unborn baby is not treated by the law as a human being.......

Seems schiztophrenic, doesn't it?

23 posted on 07/14/2014 3:57:34 PM PDT by SCalGal (Friends don't let friends donate to H$U$, A$PCA, or PETA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NYer

ANY woman who has sex with this man WHO IS NOT A WHORE has to be nuts...

His picture should be posted in women’s bathrooms all over the city.


24 posted on 07/14/2014 4:09:51 PM PDT by GOPJ (A ship once out of port is hard to capture:know this now before it is too late. - Solon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

Let’s wait and see how the “it’s just a clump of cells” defense plays out in court.


25 posted on 07/14/2014 4:17:27 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
Well, liberals may rethink some of their ideas about abortion when you hear a story such as this.

Yeah, they might not have realized how easily they could get the drugs for it right over the Internet.

26 posted on 07/14/2014 4:24:44 PM PDT by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

Those laws vary from state to state.


27 posted on 07/14/2014 4:25:00 PM PDT by jocon307
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NYer

There’s nothing some in KS or (NYC for that matter} won’t do to bring about their beloved abortions.


28 posted on 07/14/2014 4:25:08 PM PDT by Theodore R. (Liberals keep winning; so the American people must now be all-liberal all the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #29 Removed by Moderator

To: NorthMountain

Abortion.

Sodomy.

Socialism.

A.S.S.


30 posted on 07/14/2014 4:52:14 PM PDT by CommieCutter ("For an idea to be too simplistic, it must first be proven wrong" --Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Can Mr Bollig be aborted after his 40th trimester?

What is the maximum penalty in his state?

31 posted on 07/14/2014 5:08:49 PM PDT by Know et al (Keep on Freepin'!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NYer

If a woman has the right to decide whether or not she should get an abortion, then the father should have a vote, too. If he wants the woman to abort and she doesn’t, then he pays nothing. Promote that and watch their heads explode.


32 posted on 07/14/2014 5:09:51 PM PDT by VerySadAmerican (Liberals were raised by women or wimps. And they're all stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VerySadAmerican
If a woman has the right to decide whether or not she should get an abortion, then the father should have a vote, too. If he wants the woman to abort and she doesn’t, then he pays nothing. Promote that and watch their heads explode.

It's called a "paper abortion" and you're right...their heads explode. And by "they" I mean ALL women.

Apparently, women on the left AND the right prefer to see abortion without restriction than run the risk of getting left holding the bag.

33 posted on 07/14/2014 5:23:31 PM PDT by papertyger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Mothers have killed 1.34 Billion of their children just since 1980.

Mothers have killed more people, just since 1980, than all the world’s wars and health epidemics combined.

The most deadly place in the world for a child is in their mother’s womb.

Only a mother is entitled to kill children.


34 posted on 07/14/2014 6:06:53 PM PDT by jacknhoo (Luke 12:51. Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jacknhoo

Sorry, forgot to add a link:

Number of Abortions - Abortion Counters
Each real-time abortion counter is based on the most current statistics* for the number of abortions in the US & the number of abortions Worldwide.

http://www.numberofabortions.com/


35 posted on 07/14/2014 6:17:21 PM PDT by jacknhoo (Luke 12:51. Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
"He was just exercising his unilateral right NOT to be a father. Whats wrong with that?"

well, he could have just cut over his dinky and be done with it.../sarc

OR, he could have simply used condom OR he could have just saved sexual relationships until he was married or at least found a woman he wanted to have children with....

but he didn't do any of that now did he....

36 posted on 07/14/2014 8:56:03 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

Women are legally considered children in many ways. That is why he is in jail.

Sick SOB, but hardly uncommon.


37 posted on 07/15/2014 5:19:50 AM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: papertyger

Sadly you are right.

It is like fiscal conservatism. Everyone is for it, till it is their turn.

This is also why HRC will win the presidential election. Women will vote for her because she is a woman.


38 posted on 07/15/2014 5:23:44 AM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: cherry
OR, he could have simply used condom OR he could have just saved sexual relationships until he was married or at least found a woman he wanted to have children with....

How is it in any way equitable for him to be restricted to the pre-pregnancy slate of choices you provide, while she can unilaterally decide to make him an indentured servant, or unilaterally decide to kill his offspring, subsequent to said pregnancy?

Women's Equality, indeed!

39 posted on 07/15/2014 1:02:26 PM PDT by papertyger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

Doubt it - if anything, it will reinforce their assertion that women are victims of men and they need big gov’t to support and defend their “right to choose”.

Of course, no one could have seen this scenario coming when an abortifacient is readily available over the counter at the drug store, more easily obtained than a common decongestant.


40 posted on 07/15/2014 1:04:24 PM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson