Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Responsibility2nd
"He was just exercising his unilateral right NOT to be a father. Whats wrong with that?"

well, he could have just cut over his dinky and be done with it.../sarc

OR, he could have simply used condom OR he could have just saved sexual relationships until he was married or at least found a woman he wanted to have children with....

but he didn't do any of that now did he....

36 posted on 07/14/2014 8:56:03 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: cherry
OR, he could have simply used condom OR he could have just saved sexual relationships until he was married or at least found a woman he wanted to have children with....

How is it in any way equitable for him to be restricted to the pre-pregnancy slate of choices you provide, while she can unilaterally decide to make him an indentured servant, or unilaterally decide to kill his offspring, subsequent to said pregnancy?

Women's Equality, indeed!

39 posted on 07/15/2014 1:02:26 PM PDT by papertyger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson