Posted on 07/14/2014 2:54:37 PM PDT by NYer
Four months after a New York man was arrested for slipping abortion pills into his girlfriend’s body after sex, causing the death of the couple’s unborn child, another man is being tried for a similar crime.
A Kansas man has killed his girlfriend’s unborn baby by crushing up an abortion causing drug and baking it into a pancake, which he then gave to her to eat. 30-year-old Scott Bollig is being held for trial after two days of preliminary hearings.
Police say that the drug involved is mifepristone. Mifepristone, sometimes referred to as RU-486, is commonly given in abortion clinics to kill developing babies in the first trimester of pregnancy. It is usually used with a second drug, Misoprostol, which induces bleeding.
Bollig’s girlfriend, Naomi Abbott, miscarried on January 31, and doctors found traces of the mifepristone in her blood. When confronted, Bollig admitted to purchasing the drug over the Internet and using it to poison his girlfriend and her unborn baby.
He is being charged with battery and first-degree murder in the death of the child.
Bollig’s arrest was handled by the WaKeeney police force, and the crime took place near there. Had Abbott gotten in her car and driven for a little less than three hours into the city of Wichita, she could have legally obtained the drugs to cause her own abortion.
However, because the baby was killed against her will outside of a medical setting, the charge is first-degree murder. In this case, whether or not a baby is wanted by his mother determines whether the child’s death is murder or a simple medical procedure.
exactly. it’s extremely hypocritical of libs not to recognize this.
“The law is an ass’
The law is a typical irrational, liberal law. It is written with a woman’s emotions in mind rather than the scientific truth of a new human being forming inside the Mother’s body.
The more irrational liberal mind-set is that they accuse Conservatives of not being scientifically minded.
Seems schiztophrenic, doesn't it?
ANY woman who has sex with this man WHO IS NOT A WHORE has to be nuts...
His picture should be posted in women’s bathrooms all over the city.
Let’s wait and see how the “it’s just a clump of cells” defense plays out in court.
Yeah, they might not have realized how easily they could get the drugs for it right over the Internet.
Those laws vary from state to state.
There’s nothing some in KS or (NYC for that matter} won’t do to bring about their beloved abortions.
Abortion.
Sodomy.
Socialism.
What is the maximum penalty in his state?
If a woman has the right to decide whether or not she should get an abortion, then the father should have a vote, too. If he wants the woman to abort and she doesn’t, then he pays nothing. Promote that and watch their heads explode.
It's called a "paper abortion" and you're right...their heads explode. And by "they" I mean ALL women.
Apparently, women on the left AND the right prefer to see abortion without restriction than run the risk of getting left holding the bag.
Mothers have killed 1.34 Billion of their children just since 1980.
Mothers have killed more people, just since 1980, than all the world’s wars and health epidemics combined.
The most deadly place in the world for a child is in their mother’s womb.
Only a mother is entitled to kill children.
Sorry, forgot to add a link:
Number of Abortions - Abortion Counters
Each real-time abortion counter is based on the most current statistics* for the number of abortions in the US & the number of abortions Worldwide.
http://www.numberofabortions.com/
well, he could have just cut over his dinky and be done with it.../sarc
OR, he could have simply used condom OR he could have just saved sexual relationships until he was married or at least found a woman he wanted to have children with....
but he didn't do any of that now did he....
Women are legally considered children in many ways. That is why he is in jail.
Sick SOB, but hardly uncommon.
Sadly you are right.
It is like fiscal conservatism. Everyone is for it, till it is their turn.
This is also why HRC will win the presidential election. Women will vote for her because she is a woman.
How is it in any way equitable for him to be restricted to the pre-pregnancy slate of choices you provide, while she can unilaterally decide to make him an indentured servant, or unilaterally decide to kill his offspring, subsequent to said pregnancy?
Women's Equality, indeed!
Doubt it - if anything, it will reinforce their assertion that women are victims of men and they need big gov’t to support and defend their “right to choose”.
Of course, no one could have seen this scenario coming when an abortifacient is readily available over the counter at the drug store, more easily obtained than a common decongestant.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.