In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error.
Romans 1:17
In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error.
Romans 1:17
Amen! Pack the piper pay the price. No worries about trans placenta transmission.
Romans has it exactly correct. They receive due penalty for their error. Unfortunately, this always permeates outwards.
HIV exploding among gay men. Sarge - Gollly!
“take antiretroviral drugs to prevent infection. “
That won’t prevent infection.
Which makes you question why the gummit is actively promoting this activity? Heterosexual men have no chance of catching HIV so how do they come up with 19%?
Pray America wakes up
“Preventive drugs”???
How about quit sticking your penises into each others’ rectums?
Hmmmmm?
Maybe?
Ya think that might minimize the problem?
Those are still pretty lousy odds given the stakes. (by the way, the Bible verse you quote in your post is Romans 1:27 not 1:17)
And naturally, an admonition to avoid promiscuous anal intercourse is nowhere on the list of recommendations.
Good now lets see you filthy creeps push your disgusting life style in our face..maybe we will one day be rid of your filthy asses..
Your number one fan OBAMA will one day get his too..I wonder how many men besides Reggie the Muslim shags..
Like Trinoassitol?
Is that letter real? So Obama’s claim for support of traditional marriage in 2008 is a verifiable lie?
Lepers are placed in colonies, TB patients are confined in isolated institutions, maybe non-celibate homosexuals (if there is such a thing) should be removed from society and placed in colonies as well - for the sake of the whole.
We don’t need preventative drugs. What we need is to find a way to speed up the course of the infection. If we reduced the time from infection to death to 30 days, HIV/AIDS will become a thing of the past. Keeping infected people alive allows them to spread the virus which is leading to the “exploding” of the virus among homosexual men.
We were told in the 1980s the truth: HIV was hard to catch, you could not catch it from a sneeze, a handshake, or a mosquito.
Discover Magazine in 1985 told the truth: HIV transmission and infection was prevalent in the gay male community largely due to a specific risky homosexual behavior (anal sex), and while possible, it was hard to transmit from a male to a female in vaginal sex. Similarly, it was almost impossible to transmit from female to male via vaginal sex.
So the heterosexuals discounted HIV/AIDS as a "gay disease". But the politically correct police decided heterosexuals "must be made to care", so they declared it a "sexually transmitted disease", not a "gay disease", and highlighted heterosexual transmission, with no consideration of the specific behaviors which may have transmitted it. They lumped in transsexual females into the female category to raise the number of "females" who were infected by "heterosexual sex". They refused to drill down into possible IV drug use among infected heterosexuals, or high risk sexual behavior, especially given changing sexual morals over the generations. They focused on statistics from Africa, where ignorance and other factors raised the risk of heterosexual transmission. And they then took those statistics and told us they applied to the general, first-world heterosexual population.
They promoted the "Get Tested" campaign, which was propaganda to scare the heterosexual community. Moochelle pushed this propaganda as the "responsible thing to do."
Back in 2005 Discover Magazine rescinded and apologized for its 1985 article, never mind that no fact stated in the 1985 article was untrue. Discover's 2005 point was there was significant HIV infection among heterosexual women in Africa. And therefore, political correctness had to rule.
I also just read a Facebook post that viral researchers are trying to blame HIV's "discrimination" on different strains of the virus. Really. They are really blaming the difference on the theory of a homophobic single-cell organism.
Also, never mind the obvious control group: lesbians. If HIV/AIDS is just another sexually transmitted disease, like herpes, and can be transmitted by infected females to their partners (a key necessity in for the heterosexual AIDS myth to be accepted) why is there not much infection in the lesbian community? Why are they not encouraging lesbians to "get tested"?
Now we see stats showing such severe infection rates among homosexual men and transsexual women (i.e., homosexual men), to the point a special exception must be made for them, and expensive preemptive retroviral drugs given to them.
The contradiction is writ large: If we are all at risk, and all should get regular testing, why are the retroviral drugs only recommended for homosexual men?
The politically correct should not be able to have it both ways. HIV/AIDS cannot be a universal disease we are all at risk of catching, and a disease which dominantly infects gay males, unless considering how the disease is transmitted (i.e., behavior). But they are trying to have it both ways. Homophobic viral strains are attacking gay males, so we must provide them free retroviral drugs, and not dare suggest they modify their behavior--in fact, the whole "safe sex" thing is not spoken about nearly as much.
This whole affair is like the propaganda in a totalitarian county. To me, the truth screams through. To the liberal and politically correct, they simply cannot see the truth.
And the truth is, preemptive retroviral drugs (paid for by Obamacare), any sex will be seen as "safe", and the epidemic will continue, and grow.
"Truth isn't mean, it's truth." - Andrew Breitbart
And THESE are the people who want to start contaminating the blood supply again!
duh!
who didn’t think drugs that dont cure the disease, but only mask the symptoms and extend life wouldn’t result in a higher AIDS infection percentage!
Then the general public was subjected to a barrage of pro-homosexual messages, plays, and movies concerning the subject. The media outright lied to the public that everybody was equally liable to contracting the disease when they knew full well that if you weren't a male homosexual engaging in unsafe buggering practices or a dirty-needle junkie, the odds of contracting the disease were tiny. Even though some people (Arthur Ashe) were infected by HIV-tainted blood tranfusions and died, the risk for non-male homos was exceedling small.
So since then I weep few tears for these people. They spread a disease that managed to kill hundreds or thousands of innocent people who did not engage in unsafe sex practices, and they blamed other people (Reagan, conservatives) because they didn't find a cure overnight allowing them to keep engaging in unsafe buggering. Even now many of them still practice unsafe sex and keep getting infected. They made their bed, they can lay in it.
Anyone notice that even with the condoms and anti-viral the risk is only lessened by 20-25%?
I wonder what it would be reduced with just condoms.
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.
Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.
Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.