Hume has been bought and paid for, ‘fraid to say.
Total lie.
Idiot.
Brit is hot for amnesty.
He verbally b slapped Laura Ingraham recently. she stated something in defense long after his hissiness was off the air for the sake of dignity of Fox.
He was catty.
Declare war on Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador, and arrest them as enemy aliens.
The border crisis that he created.
The president of the United States — whoever that may be at any given time — cannot illegally encourage and aid a foreign invasion and then expect to be shielded by the letter, but not intent, of the law.
My GAWD. WTH happened to Brit Hume? He used to be someone respectable.
So this administration, which has stepped on the Constitution and broken just about every other law, has now decided to “follow the law” when it comes to all these illegals.
It’s good to be king. You can pick and choose which laws to uphold and which to disregard.
I’ve never seen Brit Hume so passionate about anything—ever.
He wa not objective in the least.
Like he is on a personal crusade.
He loves those ‘lil chilren.
Was Obama following the law with his 2012 backdoor amnesty for Dreamers? This is the action that precipitated the flood on the border.
Liberal-licker Brit Hume is less conservative
than Hillary Clinton.
Huh? No law on the books about being in the US illegally? So what about the guy who missed the deadline getting out on a visa by 30 minutes and was jailed. What about the Australian teen who was jailed for three weeks incommunicado - was not allowed to contact consulate or her parents. The 0bama regime decides what laws they will obey and which ones they ignore.
PS - the guy who overstayed his visa by a half hour was actually hung up at the border into Canada because of traffic.
PPSS - and meanwhile a US Marine is still held in a Mexican jail .....
If it is the law’s fault, then, why doesn’t OdumBO request to repeal it? If it is helping him then it is his fault.
He’s right, but only so far. Obama put the refugee law on steroids by his illegal Dreamer ex-order plus the facts on the ground that filtered back to LatAm ... Obama simply so NOT deporting inland.
Brit, when has Obama EVER been constrained by a law?
Doesn’t this sewer have “laws” anymore making it illegal for anyone to invade our country? What the hell “laws” is the Kenyan boy “following”?
Regarding the title of the referenced article, please consider the following.
FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponents Argument
More specifically, what we're probably never going to hear from a Fx News correspondent concerning any federal immigration law is the following. Polticially correct interpretations of the Constitution's uniform Rule of Naturalization aside (Clause 4 of Section 8 of Article I), the states have never delgated to the feds, expressly via the Constitution, the specific power to regulate immigration.
In fact, Thomas Jefferson had clarified, in terms of the 10th Amendment nonotheless, that the states have never delegated such power to Congress.
4. _Resolved_, That alien friends are under the jurisdiction and protection of the laws of the State wherein they are: that no power over them has been delegated to the United States, nor prohibited to the individual States, distinct from their power over citizens. And it being true as a general principle, and one of the amendments to the Constitution having also declared, that the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people, the act of the Congress of the United States, passed on the day of July, 1798, intituled An Act concerning aliens, which assumes powers over alien friends, not delegated by the Constitution, is not law, but is altogether void, and of no force [emphasis added]. Thomas Jefferson, Draft of the Kentucky Resolutions - October 1798.
In fact, for those Democrats and RINOs that would argue that the feds can regulate immigration simply because the Constitution doesn't say that it can't, the Supreme Court has clarified the following. Powers not expressly delegated by the states to the feds expressly via the Constitution are prohibited to the feds.
From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added]. United States v. Butler, 1936.
He isn’t “following” the law, Brit, he is exploiting a flawed law in order to bring down America. Hate to say it, Brit, you are a dope.