Posted on 07/05/2014 8:38:38 AM PDT by madprof98
BJ Barone and Frankie Nelson recently became dads to a beautiful baby named Milo, and Canadian photographer Lindsay Foster captured the first time they held their newborn son.
Heartstrings of people all over the world were tugged by these amazing, intimate moments, and the photos have since become viral.
(Excerpt) Read more at elitedaily.com ...
Homos and enablers flock these kind of demented horror stories with their f*ckbook accounts. Remember the stupid little symbol thing began on social media to push the agenda. I would be ashamed if these were family members posting these comments.
I’m sure the tolerance flames will be burning me alive any minute now.
...not likely...but the drama queen flames might...
Well now...skin to skin at birth? These creeps have taken their homosexuality to new lower levels. Nobody in my family took off their shirts to “kangaroo cuddle” my sons! Utter nonsense!
That kid will grow up wondering what it was that his mother could have handed him over to these creeps! Regardless of how she became pregnant....the mother abandoned him.
But the very fact that the child is set up for a planned adoption by two men or two women, means they -- or the agency that set it up --- think that there is nothing particularly desirable about natural fatherhood and motherhood and/or that a child has no right to his mother.
They're deficient in the very area where diversity and balance counts: diversity in relating to a father AND a mother, and balance in experiencing day by day the affective complementarity of marriage: of a man and a woman in a good marital relationship.
Walker Percy and his two younger brothers were raised well by their homosexual but singleton second cousin, William Alexander Percy, when their parents both (apparently) committed suicide. God protect those who are thrust by happenstance into a broken situation. Bless the caregivers, imperfect as they may be, who do as well as they can. Sometimes --- often --- a child could get stuck in a an unbalanced situation by tragedy or chance.
But it should not be imposed on any child by choice.
That's what's wrong with this whole situation. These homosexual men are not responding to the felt needs of a motherless child who needed somebody, some generous person to step into his broken situation and help him. No. They CREATED the broken situation by plan. They MADE that child motherless; they signed a contract that will KEEP him motherless; they paid the money and, via a tech team and a rented woman, they concocted a boy.
Though they may treat him well, as an expensive pet, they have already violated his dignity as a human being.
I’ve had three children, and skin contact was advocated each time,,optional for both mom and dad. Hubby nuzzled the babies to his neck and I fed them..we each did our own type of “bonding”. I have to believe the effect is positive. If it reduces stress in the baby, isn’t it worth considering? It’s certainly not hurting anything.
“Baby Milo was born on June 27. A surrogate mother who wasn’t related to either Barone or Nelson and who didn’t use her own eggs delivered the baby, and was ‘very happy to have given this gift.’”
Shame on her!
Exactly.
You sum it up well. The child is a pet to these people, and I pray he is lucky enough not to become a sex pet as so many kids from Australia to Alabama have.
Didn’t sell any of your kids to the gay couple down the street, I hope? To be “loving” and “tolerant” and all, I mean.
I can see serious mommy and daddy conflicts arising...
Hi Mrs D. I hear what you are saying and it sounds very well intentioned and authentic. I respect your position, totally.
I am at a loss as to how to respond regarding judgement on how or why a baby comes to be. I just don’t go into the judgement aspect of it. The baby is an innocent. If he feels loved, and is loved, I’m not sure he’d agree the situation is “broken.”
Thank you for being reasonable.
Of course not. I raised them all and I’m still very close to all three.
The entire moment of those two men holding that child shirtless is nonsense...I stand On what I said.
I don’t know or care who it is that advocates skin contact. It pretty much comes natural for average parents to touch and cuddle their newborns to their cheeks and certainly a child feels the wrist pulse if you’re looking for some sort of scientific mumbo jumbo to say there’s a “specific” way to cuddle.
Most parents don’t need instructions....it comes very natural.
Gushy nonsense. No wonder the American family is crumbling, despite all the "skin to skin" connections the trendy set may make.
I just threw up in my mouth!
....”I pray he is lucky enough not to become a sex pet”....
Too late IMO...he’s already being set up one way or another either in his own life in this un-natural environment...or and in the life he will have as an adult.
No different then when Muslim kids are taught to hate from infancy....even though as they grow it goes against the God given inner sense that somethings wrong the indoctrination smoothers the natural senses God instills in a child.
Think of the poor judge. How's he going to figure out which Daddy gets shafted?
As others have pointed out, the fact that they are bare-chested, and one looks like he’s ready to try and breastfeed tells me this child is in for abuse.
“Where’s mommy?”
I agree.
Good grief! The woman who bore the baby did NOT use her own egg. Did they have any record of just who the mother really is?
And will the “fathers” teach him how to understand women? Will this child resent never knowing where the heck he came from?
Ok...now I about tossed my cookies...
"the rhythm of a parent’s heartbeat are thought to reduce the baby’s stress level"...that's because the baby in the womb constantly heard it's "Mother" heartbeat, not some random homo...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.