I can’t wait until this guy is subject to Sharia Law.
That tweet is all you need to see to know that this author is SO Wrong in So Many Ways!
Who cares what some liberal ranting bull dyke thinks!?
This isn’t an issue of big business vs the little guy. It’s an issue of idiot sticks like this “B” thinking the government should be able to dictate to religion institutions how they observe their religious beliefs.
FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.
It’s a very limited decision and won’t have wide-ranging impact, except for political value. I don’t have any problem with contraception, as I don’t consider ordinary contraception to be like abortion (but abortion, itself, is a different story).
So, I personally didn’t care if contraception was supplied ... other than the fact that it’s good that the religious preferences were respected.
But, also keep in mind that this would apply to every religion’s preferences, too ... not just Christianity ... and in that very limited sense (as in Hobby Lobby) it could apply to religious preferences that Christianity doesn’t support in the least.
Leftists are always wrong
-PJ
Oh great. that will be the regime/media story line when they get Abu Khattala to say in court it was the video????
I just really despise what it going on in the country now a days. just awful fn awful.
I don’t know what is worse, it happening or NOBODY stopping it?
Thank goodness for todays rulings.
Sally, boobie, all the SCOTUS said is that you and your roomie (or is that wombie) Sandy Fluck (rhymes with...you know) will have to shell out 10 bucks a month for the stuff to keep your bed hopping promiscuity from producing an offspring (for which we thank you) instead of others having to pay for that stuff.
Now you and Sandy strap that mattress on your back and GET BUSY!!
Thanks for the tweet reference. Shows immediately what she is, a parrot for democrat talking points.
This woman sees this ruling as bad,but can’t see all the problems built into Obamacare. There’s no reasoning with mindsets like that,I guess.
When did they start caring about “fairness”? Obama has no right to require anyone to buy anything (Obamacare). They sure are selective, aren’t they?
Boo Hoo. The Supreme Court ruled against the national socialist democrats for a change and they’re SO unhappy.
She certainly has a queer opinion of religious liberty.
“She” probably already had this article prepared days ago, with ample outside help from the White House radicals and sympathetic left-wing university professors.
Now expect the same from the New York Times, Washington Post, CNN, etc., as the White House sends out its marching orders to all their boot-licking media lackeys.
So, somehow science is the determining factor on what believers are allowed to believe?
This conflated argument is farcical: It is the first I’ve ever heard that the establishment clause went something like this: “Congress, or the East India Company, or any other large corporation, shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion” While the colonists had issues with the East India Company, they were all about restriction of trade and taxes - nothing at all about religion.
The government stating that one’s religions beliefs do not comport with the latest science opinions, and therefor said one cannot adhere to their religious beliefs - is EXACTLY what the establishment clause prohibits.
All else is simply the yowling of a cat who finds its tail unfortunately positioned relative to the rockers on Granny’s chair.
If, after having sex during a fertile time, a female doesn't take the drugs, a woman might be pregnant and deliver a baby.
Take the drug, kill the embryo and - no baby!
That is not contraception, it's abortion and many of us are not only opposed to that but refuse to be forced to pay for someone else to abort their baby by taking it!
Sally....show it to me in the constitution, where its a bad decision.