Posted on 06/30/2014 7:24:01 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
The U.S. Supreme Court has given the Obama administration (and, hopefully the world) a lesson in the first freedom. I'm sorry it was necessary, but it was—the government cannot (and must not) require people of faith to violate their sincerely-held beliefs.
The ruling in favor of Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood Specialties underscores religious liberty as our "first freedom." The freedom to exercise religion, enshrined in our Constitution's Bill of Rights, has been called "the cornerstone of the American experiment" because it is from our religious freedom all of our other freedoms flow.
Below is a graphic from a LifeWay Research study conducted in November of 2012, showing that most Americans support mandatory contraception coverage through ObamaCare.
Before the ruling, former U.S. Solicitor General Ken Starr pointed out that religious liberty was certainly at stake behind the legalese of the arguments being made by the U.S. government:
If the Supreme Court accepts the government's formalistic argument (that a corporation cannot exercise a right to free exercise of religion), it will deal an unnecessary blow to the cause of religious liberty and simply create incentives for families of conscience to carry on their business enterprise in another form. The Greens will, win or lose, be able to carry on and continue their admirable mission to serve a cause higher and nobler than their own commercial success. But something very valuable—the nation's historic commitment to religious freedom—will have been needlessly compromised.
(Excerpt) Read more at christianitytoday.com ...
According to FOX, there are over 100 cases like Hobby Lobby pending in various lower courts. The decision today was a bell weather for other courts and only led the way for the other cases. If the other filings are substantially like the Hobby Lobby, the other cases will be summarily thrown out in favor of the litigants. The government will have no appeal.
Thanks.
I was not aware of John.
I’m going to have to wait for a smarter legal mind than mine to decipher this, but it seems that one of the very reasons they considered it unconstitutional in this particular case was because of the corporate structure of Hobby Lobby. So I’m not sure it does apply to different types of businesses or non profits.
Hayward writes for Human events
There is, of course, a danger in posting Tweets. Let’s see what Roberts actually says. Of course, also, he is under a great cloud of suspicion for his previous decision.
Thanks.
"does [not] provide a shield for employers who might cloak illegal discriminationas a religious practice."
“Where Do We Go from Here?”
Pitchforks, torches, tar, feathers. I know this decisions is favorable, but there’s no reason why we should be sitting on pins and needles waiting to see which liberty Kennedy thinks we should have.
>Well, this is something that we should be concerned about. WHAT IF it came from Congress, is he then going to side with the liberals?
Yes, excellent point. The Kennedy statement at first holds promise but there is the concern that Congress can squeak one by, 5-4.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/hobby-lobby-wins-contraceptive-ruling-supreme-court/story?id=24364311
Here is the story that Drudge’s lurid headkine links to. I cannot find Roberts’ name at all. Lesson learned (by me)
Unlikely. The decision specifically said it applied to one narrow issue (e.g. companies run by Jehovah’s Witnesses can’t decide to exclude blood transfusions).
The butthurt on MSNBC is heartwarmingly epic.
So am I reading what this means correctly: So only churches and closely-held private corporations have religious freedom. Ordinary Americans and other corporations do not?
That’s the thing I don’t like about Drudge. I’ve felt my blood pressure rise many a time only to find out that the headline was, at best, an exaggeration.
True, however, with the help of politically correct National Board members intent on instilling "diversity" at all costs, the BSA caved completely on their own...the BSA committed suicide.
RE: So only churches and closely-held private corporations have religious freedom. Ordinary Americans and other corporations do not?
You would read it correctly. But ALAS, that’s what’s happening to our country today. Justice Roberts essentially opened up this can of worms when he refused to declare Obamacare’s mandate unconstitutional.
We wouldn’t need to go the Hobby Lobby or Sister of the Poor route had Roberts done is job rightly.
“Can we please enjoy a win here? “
Sure, as the surfer said when he saw the tusami:
“Surf’s UP!”
Cartoon is clever.
I think some Jews in Germany might have said: Gee, this star is well made and I won, I don’t have to ride in the boxcar, I can ride on the open flat car.
Yep, a great day in America, I only have to pay for some contraceptives!
I just find it amazing that this is considered a Win.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.