Gee, I wonder how many clean mattresses that necklace could have bought.
Posted on 05/21/2014 7:43:26 AM PDT by Kaslin
WASHINGTON - The scandal that has exploded in the government's veterans hospitals runs a lot deeper than the issue of long waits for those seeking medical care.
And it's been going on for a great deal longer, too, as a mountain of Government Accountability Office audits can attest over many decades: Countless reports of medical mistreatment; dangerously lengthy delays for ill veterans seeking care; shocking mortality rates when compared to private sector hospitals for similar surgeries; old, rundown facilities; and aged, broken medical equipment.
These and other problems in the VA's vast bureaucracy have been exposed in a sea of reports now gathering dust in congressional oversight committees that have failed to effectively address their findings.
Lawmakers at Senate hearings last week were beating their breasts over reports of veterans facing long treatment delays that have resulted in numerous deaths. We still do not know how many because of recent stories that the real numbers have been covered up.
Still, the fact remains that Congress has not done its job to see that VA programs, staffing, facilities and equipment are adequately funded and reforms enacted across the entire VA landscape. It's been asleep at the switch.
Nor has the Obama administration done anywhere near the due diligence needed to see that VA has the resources to adequately care for the thousands of soldiers returning home from the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.
But the tragedy of this latest VA scandal is that we keep making the same mistakes over and over again, and never learn from them.
Let's go back seven years ago when Washington Post reporters -- after exposing shockingly shabby, unhealthy conditions at Walter Reed Hospital -- found many of the same problems existed throughout the VA's organization.
On March 5, 2007, reporters Anne Hull and Dana Priest told the story of 70-year-old Ray Oliva whose "own VA hospital....was a mess.
The [hospital] gown he wore was torn. The wheelchairs were old and broken."
"It is not just Walter Reed," he told them. "The VA hospitals are not good either except for the staff who work so hard."
The veterans in his VA facility, he said, "had to ask for beds that had good mattresses instead of broken and old."
"I sat with guys who'd served in 'Nam," Oliva said. "We had terrible problems with the VA. But we were all so powerless to do anything about them."
"Across the country, some military quarters for wounded outpatients are in bad shape, according to interviews, GAO reports and transcripts of congressional testimony," Hull and Priest reported at the time.
"Among the most aggrieved are veterans who have lived with the open secret of substandard, underfunded care in the 154 VA hospitals and hundreds of community health centers around the country," they said.
Now, veterans are coming forth yet again, telling horror stories of lengthy delays for time-sensitive treatment, and reports that for too many that treatment has come too late.
I recall a more shocking situation when I was writing about GAO investigations in the 1970s and 1980s that told of higher than normal fatality rates in VA hospitals.
Anyone who thinks this problem has been fixed should read a study published in the American Journal of Public Health in December, 2007. The grim title of this report, by a team of medical specialists, says it all:
"Reducing Avoidable Deaths Among American Veterans: Directing Private-Sector Surgical Care To High-Performance Hospitals."
What this study recommended was simply letting our veterans have their surgery done at top private hospitals which would not only give them better, and more timely medical care, but, in many cases, save lives, too.
The study focused on 14 high-risk surgical procedures such as coronary bypass or carotid artery operations, and its findings were striking.
If these patients "had been directed to historically high-volume centers for their procedures, expected mortality would have decreased by 6.7 percent... potentially saving 376 lives" over the two-year period of the study.
"Directing private-sector care to medical centers with a history of low risk-adjusted mortality would have decreased expected mortality by 10.1 percent," potentially saving 584 lives.
In either case, the study concluded that the VA "should consider focusing quality improvement efforts" on the care that veterans receive in the private sector, "particularly for the high mortality procedures" that veterans often undergo as they age.
The study added that VA hospitals have "a commitment to provide safe, high-quality care to its enrolled population. One effective mechanism to meet this obligation is to help ensure the quality of care provided to veterans outside of [VA hospital] walls."
But there could be far more sweeping solutions to VA's continuing failures within the confines of this study. Let our veterans choose which hospitals they want to entrust with their care, perhaps under a voucher system financed by the government.
I once put this idea to Colin Powell during an interview for American Legion Magazine not too long after he had retired as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
Powell told me that our veterans, who may have no other option but to go to VA hospitals, should be given the freedom to choose other medical institutions for needed surgery or other treatment.
The implicit proposal in the 2007 study in the American Journal of Public Health to let veterans have this choice deserves to be taken up in Congress. But probably not without a fight.
A note at the end the study said: "The views expressed in this article do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the U.S. Government."
In Maine, Vets are complaining about the new policy of prescribing drugs first, and then maybe test. Great for the drug companies, not so good for the Vets.
Congress? Congress?
While Congress may have some oversight, these Federal Institutions are administered by the EXECUTIVE.
DON’T SHIFT THE BLAME FROM THE PRICKS WHO WERE IN CHARGE.
hang them all . .
Let’s just take the eighty billion that the VA gets...shut down the operation...and use the funding to buy each qualified vet a GS-health insurance policy. The rest of the stuff the VA does is null and worthless. We could probably save money and hassle by letting the vets use local medical care of a normal variety. If they aren’t happy...they can shop around to find another doctor or clinic. I don’t see GS workers grumbling about their packaged care.
Gee, I wonder how many clean mattresses that necklace could have bought.
If government’s veterans hospitals are doing the same thing how high up in the Obama Admin are the directions coming from
This has always been about maintaining another govt bureaucracy, where and when the private sector medical solutions were the answer.
THAT “necklace” looks like a jumbled mess of my grandmother’s old jewelry
It almost makes it look as if the government doesn’t even know how to run a healthcare program efficiently and effectively!
Meanwhile the SNAP program continues to grow.
Real threats to our way of life, and real threats to our lives are right in our faces, and they’re falling over themselves to show how tolerant they are of Sodomites and how compassionate they are for Illegals. A pox on them all for feigning outrage when they’re supposed to be the watchdogs of society.
Like somebody dropped a powerful magnet on a metalshop floor.
Here’s a bold idea....
Privatize the whole VA....
Congress would scream like howler monkeys...
Sell off it’s assets and give our veterans the care they earned....
It possibly can’t be more expensive to fund their premiums than it costs now...to run a piss poor excuse for a death panel....
Ummmm.....Don......the President is the head of The Executive Branch of our government. That’s the branch of government the VA falls under. Barack Obama is The President of The United States of America. We citizens voted to put him in charge of The Executive Branch. Obama is not doing his job. He has had 170 golf days since he took office. He seems to have plenty of time for fundraising and playing golf. He just doesn’t have time to do his job.
Obama on TV at the moment, saying how hard he’s been working to keep the VA working for Vets. Big review scheduled, and then the big guy will act.
That necklace looks like the old cookie tin my grandmother put the broken stuff in and let grand daughters play dress up with. Looks like the contents of that tin just got dumped out on the floor. Right before we set about untangling the best pieces to go with our old blanket wedding dresses and evening gowns!
I know that this subject is getting a lot of attention do to the recent gross negligence in the treatment of our country’s veterans, however this is nothing new.
The VA has always been and will continue to be a completely inept bureaucratic nightmare as long as you have folks there they don’t give a crap about anything except their federal pension.
I’m sure that we could find enough qualified men and women veterans, civilians need not apply, who would be more than capable of managing the system. I’m not necessarily talking about providing the health care, even though there are plenty of qualified nurse and doctors, but speaking more to the bureaucratic wasteland that is responsible for processing the paperwork required by all who apply to the system.
Although I'm a veteran I will never get the benefits I thought I would, as most services are now means tested. If the system were to be reformed, I suggest that the laws change so that veterans will never receive less service than was available when they served. Guys like me never considered that the benefits we were promised could ever be reduced or diluted. Back then, we had a blind faith in our government. Now, to anything the government says, I would say, "Oh, yeah? Prove it."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.