Posted on 05/19/2014 1:18:24 PM PDT by servo1969
Towson University won the 2014 Cross Examination Debate Association’s national championship on March 24, of this year. The team members inexplicably used the n-word repeatedly and babbled nonsense.
Pundit Press posted part of the debate transcript:
They say the n*****s always already qu***, that’s exactly the point! It means the impact is that the that the is the impact term, uh, to the afraid, uh, the, that it is a case term to the affirmative because, we, uh, we’re saying that qu*** bodies are not able to survive the necessarily means of the body. Uh, uh, the n***** is not able to survive…
…Uh, man’s sole “jabringing” object disfigure religion trauma and nubs, uh, the, inside the trauma of representation that turns into the black child devouring and identifying with the stories and into the white culture brought up, uh, de de de de de, dink, and add subjectively like a white man, the black man!
The topic this year was the War Powers Resolution.
Here’s the Towson Team in action:
This video is GOLD—
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FCx2uGBhvEc
The fact that I can't understand them is no doubt proof of my racism.
On the one hand it’s gibberish, and not even very good gibberish. On the other hand they did bring “nubs” into the conversation, which is a rare treat.
Yep,
no investigations, resignations or suspensions over this, look at the picture above and it will explain why.
I was in Towson this weekend not far from that school.
Where is this guy when you need him?
Mr. Madison, what you’ve just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
I bet Jabba the Witness could understand that.
She’s “tri-lingual” - but don’t put cursive in front of her.
There have been a series of articles on how Liberalism is destroying traditional debate. Students win for challenging the premise of the debate, or going off on wild tangents about war or racism. So, sadly, this nonsense does not surprise me. In the past, kids had to be relatively smart and relatively well-grounded in logic to win debate at a competition level. Now you get these fools jibbering like idiots. The real fault is with the debate judges who buy into this nonsense.
I for one am glad the children were able to experience that authentic ghetto gibberish.
The judges are no doubt self loathing liberals who were afraid of being called racists if they didn’t roll over.
What in de funk was that? That’s real retarded, sir.
Lets just call a spade a spade (or would that be racist in this case?) this was an “affirmative action” debate victory, there is no way they won it on merit....
Sincerely,
Sounds more like Tourettes U.
Who were the judges? The Nobel Peace Prize Committee?
My wife graduated from there. I can’t wait to discuss this with her.
Yeah, but it was “creative” and “entertaining”. Two of the highest values in modern America. They trump reason, logic and sense every time.
In this case the medium is the protected-class card, double- or triple-dipped.
Al ‘resist we much’ Sharpton must be in fear for his phony baloney job...
This puts Idiocracy to shame.
The Yout’s of Obama’s America
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.