1 posted on
04/26/2014 8:33:59 PM PDT by
lowbridge
To: lowbridge
“Islamic accounts were intended for customers who cannot receive or pay interest under sharia, but were available to anyone, regardless of their faith.”
oh that makes perfect sense....
2 posted on
04/26/2014 8:38:55 PM PDT by
MeshugeMikey
( "Never, never, never give up". Winston Churchill)
To: lowbridge
Don’t care. We still will kill you.
5 posted on
04/26/2014 8:52:37 PM PDT by
SkyDancer
(I Believe In The Law Until It Intereferes With Justice. And Pay Your Liberty Tax Citizen.)
To: lowbridge
Would I be correct in guessing that the Muslim prohibition on interest originally meant that a Muslim may not charge interest on money lent to another Muslim, and that likewise a Muslim does not have to pay interest to another Muslim? How does that affect money lent to a Muslim by an infidel, since the infdel is not under Allah’s law?
Or is he?
They certainly have played the game well.
7 posted on
04/26/2014 9:15:07 PM PDT by
Southside_Chicago_Republican
(If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.)
To: lowbridge
Some pigs are more equal than others
8 posted on
04/26/2014 9:15:25 PM PDT by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans!)
To: lowbridge
The UK just keeps leading the West into abyss of death and destruction!
9 posted on
04/26/2014 9:28:15 PM PDT by
Jack Hydrazine
(Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
To: lowbridge
When will civilization start fighting back against Islam?
10 posted on
04/26/2014 9:32:23 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
To: lowbridge
11 posted on
04/26/2014 10:00:09 PM PDT by
Psalm 144
(FIGHT! FIGHT! SEVERE CONSERVATIVE AND THE WILD RIGHT!)
To: lowbridge
britain surrenders more every day. why did we save these people just so they could do this? i sure miss maggie.
12 posted on
04/26/2014 11:33:37 PM PDT by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: lowbridge
The way you handle that is NO OVERDRAFTS. Any check that arrives for more than the account covers is returned with a "Not Sufficient Funds" stamp. If it happens too many times in a month, the account is closed. No interest is paid or charged, but there is a minimum balance requirement laid on the account. NSFs should be reportable to the credit rating agencies. You can have your cake, but it comes with some restrictions.
13 posted on
04/26/2014 11:51:02 PM PDT by
Myrddin
To: lowbridge
Embracing their dhimmitude...
17 posted on
04/27/2014 2:17:21 AM PDT by
sheik yerbouty
( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
To: lowbridge
To: lowbridge
Unacceptable. So they give special privileges to screaming bearded savages who hate the UK? The UK is finished, and goodbye, I couldn’t care less.
When does this come to the USA?
To: lowbridge
The document said: “We are removing the monthly overdraft management fee of £6 from our Islamic Account, Islamic Student Account and Islamic Graduate Account. So, if you use an unplanned overdraft on these accounts, there won’t be any charges.” Imagine the bleating from the Left if this statement read, "We are removing the monthly overdraft management fee of £6 from Jewish Account, Jewish Student Account, and Jewish Graduate Account. So, if you use an unplanned overdraft on these accounts, there won’t be any charges.”
20 posted on
04/27/2014 5:21:36 AM PDT by
Flick Lives
("I can't believe it's not Fascism!")
To: lowbridge
So are they saying muslims don’t know how to properly manage a bank account?
27 posted on
04/27/2014 4:15:14 PM PDT by
jughandle
( "We have the right to debate and disagree with any administration!" -HRC)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson