Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Amazing Graphic Shows Chicago’s Middle Class Disappear Before Your Eyes
chicago.cbslocal.com ^ | April 3, 2014 11:12 AM | By John Dodge

Posted on 04/03/2014 9:43:51 AM PDT by Red Badger

CHICAGO (CBS) — The graphic that you are about to see is sobering, perhaps depressing, and you can’t take your eyes off it.

We have the exhaustive work of Daniel Kay Hertz, a masters student at the University Of Chicago’s Harris School of Public Policy, to thank for that.

At the risk of sounding like an old carnival barker, step right up and watch the middle class of Chicago vanish before your eyes.

However, this is no side-show.

It shows the demise of the foundation of an American city.

Watch as the grey squares, which illustrate the middle class that dominated the most of the city’s neighborhoods in 1970s, quickly vanish over 40 years.

The poor, represented by the orange and red colors, explode across the map.

And watch what happens in the green areas representing the upper middle class and wealthy. Not surprisingly, it spreads from downtown to the north side, but not with the same ferocity as the reds and oranges.

Especially in 2000, the greens-the color of money–grow much darker. It seems the rich simply got richer. In later years, the wealthy pushed the poor out of the near West Side. It appears that area bypassed the middle.

The data comes from the U.S. Census.

In his blog, Hertz says he fears that the often-told story of segregation and income inequality in Chicago has led to apathy.

“These facts somehow seep out of the ground here, as much a part of the city as the lake, and that as a result there’s really nothing we can do about it,” Hertz writes.

Hertz says the work isn’t meant to be depressing. Not along ago, he reasons, there was a large vibrant middle class in Chicago, and it is possible to get it back.

The goal of the maps “is not merely to depress you (you’re welcome!), but to suggest just how dramatically the reality of Chicago’s ‘two cities’ has changed over the last few generations, how non-eternal its present state is, and that a happier alternate reality isn’t just possible, but actually existed relatively recently.”


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; US: Illinois
KEYWORDS: chicago
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

1 posted on 04/03/2014 9:43:51 AM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Communists hate the middle class - the middle class represents stability.


2 posted on 04/03/2014 9:45:08 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
It could be a mathematical formula: there is a direct inverse relationship between the size of government and the size of the middle class.

Nuke 80% of the $4 TRILLION government beast that is eating up America like Godzilla.

3 posted on 04/03/2014 9:47:31 AM PDT by PapaNew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

It’s a doomed city. It’s Detroit in 10 years.


4 posted on 04/03/2014 9:49:28 AM PDT by Tenacious 1 (My whimsical litany of satyric prose and avarice pontification of wisdom demonstrates my concinnity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tenacious 1

Exactly. I read this article and immediately thought of Detroit.


5 posted on 04/03/2014 9:51:45 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tenacious 1

Not a chance. It might declare bankruptcy, but that’s about it.


6 posted on 04/03/2014 9:52:34 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Behold liberalism/socialism at work...


7 posted on 04/03/2014 9:52:51 AM PDT by Sicon ("All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others." - G. Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
Not a chance. It might declare bankruptcy, but that’s about it.

You mean like Detroit, right?

8 posted on 04/03/2014 9:54:02 AM PDT by Tenacious 1 (My whimsical litany of satyric prose and avarice pontification of wisdom demonstrates my concinnity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

The green areas show tremendous growth....?


9 posted on 04/03/2014 9:58:55 AM PDT by faithhopecharity ((Brilliant, Profound Tag Line Goes Here, just as soon as I can think of one..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
“Especially in 2000, the greens-the color of money–grow much darker. It seems the rich simply got richer.”

Actually, there isn't enough information to conclude that the “rich simply got richer” — unless you're using a strictly relative measure of “richer”.

According to the legend, the graphic is based on the median income in the metro area. If you lower that median income, by substituting middle income families, with low income families, then a higher-income family that remains, will have a higher relative income — without needing to actually have more income. They will be “relatively” richer — but, not necessarily having more income.

10 posted on 04/03/2014 10:01:28 AM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA (You don't really need a sarcasm tag here, do you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

‘Income inequality’ is a lie but to the extent it exists it was accelerated by Obama and many other ‘community organizers’ in Chicago.


11 posted on 04/03/2014 10:02:06 AM PDT by relictele (Principiis obsta & Finem respice - Resist The Beginnings & Consider The End)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

It seems the rich simply got richer. In later years, the wealthy pushed the poor out of the near West Side. It appears that area bypassed the middle.


This is what happened to the Central District in Seattle, as well. I watched it happen before my very eyes.


12 posted on 04/03/2014 10:02:59 AM PDT by cuban leaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Embrace the suck? You get what the wagon riders vote into office?


13 posted on 04/03/2014 10:05:04 AM PDT by listenhillary (Courts, law enforcement, roads and national defense should be the extent of government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
It seems that most large urban areas in this once great country have degenerated into Marxist hellholes.

I never plan on living in an urban area again.

14 posted on 04/03/2014 10:08:41 AM PDT by Marathoner (When Obama fails, freedom prevails)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

Most big city’s went from Republican mayor to Democrat mayor in the mid ‘60s. This is the result.


15 posted on 04/03/2014 10:09:45 AM PDT by Mr. Peabody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

Did the middle class leave or did they just become poor? Or both?

Also, if your pay stays the same you are automatically more poor compared to price increases...so not sure how they allocate for that.


16 posted on 04/03/2014 10:12:34 AM PDT by Aria ( 2008 & 2012 weren't elections - they were coup d'etats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

This is what the neo-feudal New World Order looks like. A tiny, unaccountable Ruling Elite serviced by a small technocracy and feeding off a huge population of poor and near-poor.


17 posted on 04/03/2014 10:24:15 AM PDT by Count of Monte Fisto (The foundation of modern society is the denial of reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd; Condor51; PhilCollins

Never happen.

From the time Chicago helped elect JFK to the point at which OBamugabe was fully supported in his POTUS bid, Chicago will ALWAYS stand solvent.

Let all others fail around us, but Chicago will survive; even when Putin conquers the shores of the Great Lakes, Chicago will not fail.

Y’all think about that...MOLON LABE.


18 posted on 04/03/2014 10:30:12 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Alterations - The Acronym explains the science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Aria

The middle class shrunk dramatically, the poor increased significantly, but the rich also increased significantly. It isn’t - as the article states - simply that the rich got richer, but that there are a lot more rich than there used to be, e.g., compare the 1970 green areas to the 2012 green areas. So the economic stratification has changed from a diamond (many in the middle, few at the top or bottom), to kind of a bottom-heavy female torso (heavy hips/thighs, average waist, moderate bust) - kind of a Michelle Obama profile.


19 posted on 04/03/2014 10:32:23 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
Communists hate the middle class - the middle class represents stability.

The rich leftist elites hate the middle class -- the children of the middle class, who start businesses and invent new technologies, are competition for their own kids.

This is why they try to sabotage the public school systems, and make college so expensive that middle-class graduates are so burdened with student loan debt that they will have to work for big corporations rather than starting their own companies.

20 posted on 04/03/2014 10:36:34 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson