Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Elgin officials shocked by child porn investigation of ex-Rep. Farnham
Chicago Tribune ^ | 3-26-2014 | Stephanie K. Baer

Posted on 03/26/2014 12:34:24 PM PDT by servo1969

Reports that federal agents were looking for evidence of child pornography when they seized computers from the Elgin district office of former state Rep. Keith Farnham shocked local officials who said the lawmaker was well-liked and active in the community.

"I couldn't even fathom it. I was stunned," said former Elgin Mayor Ed Schock, adding that Farnham always worked on the city's behalf.

Farnham has not been accused of any crime.

Federal agents were searching for documents "pertaining to the possession, receipt or distribution of child pornography" as well as computer files, copies and negatives of child pornography or any documents that depicted minors "engaged in sexually explicit conduct," according to a search warrant released Friday.

Farnham, 66, a Navy veteran who ran a painting business in Elgin before running for office, announced his resignation Wednesday, saying he had been "battling serious health issues for a number of years." He won the Democratic primary the day before, running unopposed.

(Excerpt) Read more at articles.chicagotribune.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Miscellaneous; Politics/Elections; US: Illinois
KEYWORDS: child; democrat; elgin; farnham; illinois; keithfarnham; porn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

1 posted on 03/26/2014 12:34:25 PM PDT by servo1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Hey, it only took five paragraphs to mention his party affiliation. BTT


2 posted on 03/26/2014 12:37:26 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

I was shocked that they finally mentioned Keith Farnham’s party affiliation, although I was not in any way surprised that he’s a Democrat. That seems to be the party of perverts.


3 posted on 03/26/2014 12:38:07 PM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969; windcliff

“Why don’t you take a seat right over here....”


4 posted on 03/26/2014 12:39:13 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

So what prompted them to look for child porn ? Nothing mentioned that gives any reason to seize records.


5 posted on 03/26/2014 12:39:14 PM PDT by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

6 posted on 03/26/2014 12:41:29 PM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (Truth sounds like hate...to those who hate truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onedoug

He was doing research.


7 posted on 03/26/2014 12:44:08 PM PDT by windcliff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: windcliff

Oh. You’re right. My bad, or whatever it’s called these days.


8 posted on 03/26/2014 12:48:34 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

creepy dude...and no mention but it is Illinois so I assume a dimorat


9 posted on 03/26/2014 12:54:07 PM PDT by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969
announced his resignation Wednesday, saying he had been "battling serious health issues for a number of years." He won the Democratic primary the day before, running unopposed.

he resigned the very next day?

10 posted on 03/26/2014 12:55:14 PM PDT by latina4dubya (when i have money i buy books... if i have anything left, i buy 6-inch heels and a bottle of wine...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beowulf9

They can track who sends child porn back to the sending computer.


11 posted on 03/26/2014 12:56:26 PM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

People and groups promoting perversion areperverts? Shocking, not


12 posted on 03/26/2014 1:01:32 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill

Yep, that is what I was looking to find. I figured if no party affiliation was mentioned he has to be a Democrat.


13 posted on 03/26/2014 1:02:29 PM PDT by A message
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill

“If the party of the criminal offender is not listed in the first paragraph...odds are that criminal is a Democrat”

Crim’s law


14 posted on 03/26/2014 1:07:56 PM PDT by Crim (Palin / West '16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

I know that but they did not reveal that this is the reason they are there. It’s left out there for us to assume they have this as their reason.

Of course he could be guilty of this, but it makes me wonder if someone else was using his computer or some other thing.


15 posted on 03/26/2014 1:11:01 PM PDT by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Beowulf9

I have a friend who worked for the SBI doing these types of cases. They are easy to prosecute. These types usually document all of their crimes by burning DVD’s, contacting people, etc.
Porn is like a drug that robs people of common sense.


16 posted on 03/26/2014 1:14:24 PM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...

> Farnham, 66, a Navy veteran... won the Democratic primary the day before, running unopposed.

From earlier. Thanks servo1969.


17 posted on 03/26/2014 1:14:40 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/alreadyposted/index)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill; Hatteras

That’s the standard Partisan Media Shill (PMS) rule for this kind of thing.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3137592/posts?page=7#7


18 posted on 03/26/2014 1:16:33 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/alreadyposted/index)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Why would it shock anyone? The most sanctimonious are frequently the worst offenders. We’ve seen this constantly.


19 posted on 03/26/2014 1:27:53 PM PDT by Seruzawa (I kick @ss for the Lord!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

I see there are other articles, they’re searching his home as well.

He resigned after these searches began.

Not looking good, here.


20 posted on 03/26/2014 1:34:15 PM PDT by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson