Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Facebook meme claims Rand Paul and Marco Rubio have anti-science views on dinosaurs, earth's age
PolitiFact.com ^ | March 25, 2014

Posted on 03/26/2014 12:22:41 PM PDT by EveningStar

A new Facebook meme paints two leading Republicans as anti-science because of their alleged views of the age of the Earth.

The Facebook group Being Liberal posted a picture March 10, 2014, featuring side-by-side images of Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., and Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., looking somewhat sheepish. Bolded text under the images describes the senators’ views on the age of the Earth and the extinction of the dinosaurs.

According to the meme, Rubio "believes Earth (is) 9,000 years old," and "humans hunted dinosaurs to extinction." Paul, the image proclaims, says the Earth is 10,000 years old and believes "God made dinosaurs disappear to make space for humans." The post received about 5,500 likes and was shared more than 4,000 times.

Upon seeing this, we couldn’t resist digging in and finding out just what these two senators believe about the age of the Earth and the demise of the dinosaurs.

(Excerpt) Read more at politifact.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Politics/Elections; US: Florida; US: Kentucky
KEYWORDS: 2014electionbias; ageofearth; antitheism; atheistsupremacists; beingliberal; demagogicparty; dinosaurs; dnctalkingpoints; facebook; facebookmemes; florida; godgap; kentucky; marcorubio; memebuilding; mythmaking; partisanmediashill; partisanmediashills; politifact; randpaul; religiousleft; smearcampaign; socialistnetworking; thebiglie; waronchristianity; waronreligion; waronsciencememe; whispercampaign; yellowjournalism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

1 posted on 03/26/2014 12:22:41 PM PDT by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

We live in a nation of mental boobs. So tired of this crap.


2 posted on 03/26/2014 12:25:27 PM PDT by ilgipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

These leftists are OBSESSED with evolution. To me, 6,000 years of history is more than enough to deal with. What happened before that, I couldn’t care less.


3 posted on 03/26/2014 12:26:29 PM PDT by cotton1706 (ThisRepublic.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

Leaving aside the arguments for or against, their views of the earth’s age are not really material, unless the authors mean to fashion a message...which they apparently do.


4 posted on 03/26/2014 12:26:50 PM PDT by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

I would ridicule these liberals for believing that we basically evolved from a pile of goo!


5 posted on 03/26/2014 12:27:45 PM PDT by JSDude1 (Defeat Hagan, elect a Constutional Conservative: Dr. Greg Brannon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar; GeronL

And Obama doesn’t regard Jesus as his personal Savior. </ ObamaTruthFile >


6 posted on 03/26/2014 12:27:58 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (The Texas judge's decision was to pave the way for same sex divorce for two Massachusetts women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

If some smart ass tries to corner you with a question like “what is the age of the earth” just say “I don’t know. I wasn’t there. Maybe you should ask my opponent”.


7 posted on 03/26/2014 12:28:59 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

The way things are going I am beginning to not care about the future ;)


8 posted on 03/26/2014 12:29:48 PM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

These rat bastards never shut their contaminated pie holes.


9 posted on 03/26/2014 12:29:52 PM PDT by Mark17 (Chicago Blackhawks: Stanley Cup champions 2010, 2013. Vietnam Vet 70-71 Msgt US Air Force, retired)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

I understand the science, and the logic behind the science. But I still give the Bible greater credibility.

Any candidate with balls big enough to claim the same publicly, would be a plus in my book.


10 posted on 03/26/2014 12:30:44 PM PDT by DannyTN ( .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

In the 2012 election cycle, Republicans were asked (at Democrat moderated debates) various questions about their Christian faith, evolution, etc.

Obama was not pressed to declare his own lack of belief in Jesus as the only way to Salvation. Yet the church going (and preaching) voters saw him as a Christian (because his campaign staff said he was). His site even claimed in the fight the smears section that he was a LIFE LONG Christian. Elsewhere he held himself at a higher moral position because he “came to Christ” on his own (without his parents’ influence) later in life as an adult (it was the former muslim Jeremiah Wright who “brought him there”).

Either religious questions are fair game for all candidates of they aren’t. Letting Democrats moderate GOP primaries is stupid.


11 posted on 03/26/2014 12:33:19 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (The Texas judge's decision was to pave the way for same sex divorce for two Massachusetts women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: All; ilgipper; cotton1706; lurk; JSDude1; a fool in paradise

I’m wondering if anyone here read the entire article.


12 posted on 03/26/2014 12:34:29 PM PDT by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

Good to see the Dems haven’t abandoned their strategy of distracting you with shiny objects.


13 posted on 03/26/2014 12:34:45 PM PDT by thorvaldr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

This has nothing to do with science or history, at its core. It has everything to do with the “personalized” “entity” science providing the basis for using ridicule as an attack mechanism. Both Alinsky tools/tactics.

Darwinism and “Science” are a mean to an end...yet the left loons will continue to stump in ethnically specific churches...won’t they.


14 posted on 03/26/2014 12:38:27 PM PDT by sayfer bullets (“I didn’t leave the [---] party, the [---] party left me.” - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

Any presidential candidate spouting creationism will come off looking like a certified kook.


15 posted on 03/26/2014 12:38:38 PM PDT by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

Amen. As previously mentioned, they weren’t there. Historical science ain’t observable and repeatable and therefore ain’t in the same category as operational science. Adam, for instance, being created fully grown, would have an appearance of age, just as the trees, etc., that were instantaneously created would have.

This then boils down to faith. Do we have faith that the science is true and the Bible is a lie, or do we have faith that the Bible is true and science (as evolutionists interpret it) is a lie? As for me and my house...


16 posted on 03/26/2014 12:39:17 PM PDT by afsnco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

The Libs are pushing an artificial meme to continue the “war on science” talking point.

If a Republican candidate has a religious base, the push will be on to make him appear to be a “flat earther”.

Democrats are not held to this same standard. Let alone the talking points used by the Left are manufactured lies (lies by omission are lies as well).


17 posted on 03/26/2014 12:41:50 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (The Texas judge's decision was to pave the way for same sex divorce for two Massachusetts women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar; NFHale; sickoflibs
had to go to the sight and read the whole thing...*shocked* that the retard sight called 'being liberal' would take a statement out of context and make up *facts* out of whole cloth for their drooling followers...

as stated upstream, the *science* is arguable, so any pol willing to state their beliefs and stick to them gets a plus in their column from me...

and at this point, the pluses are so few, any are welcomed to motivate me to vote *for* a particular person...

18 posted on 03/26/2014 12:42:22 PM PDT by Gilbo_3 (Gov is not reason; not eloquent; its force.Like fire,a dangerous servant & master. George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

According to Gallup, 46% of Americans believe in Creationism.
I think it’s time we quit worrying about what the liberal press tells us will make us look like kooks.

A good portion of the rest, will realize that it doesn’t matter for policy.

I’d rather look like a kook than a RINO.


19 posted on 03/26/2014 12:43:32 PM PDT by DannyTN ( .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

According to Gallup, 46% of Americans believe in Creationism.
I think it’s time we quit worrying about what the liberal press tells us will make us look like kooks.

A good portion of the rest, will realize that it doesn’t matter for policy.

I’d rather look like a kook than a RINO.


20 posted on 03/26/2014 12:43:32 PM PDT by DannyTN ( .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson