Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EveningStar

I understand the science, and the logic behind the science. But I still give the Bible greater credibility.

Any candidate with balls big enough to claim the same publicly, would be a plus in my book.


10 posted on 03/26/2014 12:30:44 PM PDT by DannyTN ( .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DannyTN

Any presidential candidate spouting creationism will come off looking like a certified kook.


15 posted on 03/26/2014 12:38:38 PM PDT by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: DannyTN

Amen. As previously mentioned, they weren’t there. Historical science ain’t observable and repeatable and therefore ain’t in the same category as operational science. Adam, for instance, being created fully grown, would have an appearance of age, just as the trees, etc., that were instantaneously created would have.

This then boils down to faith. Do we have faith that the science is true and the Bible is a lie, or do we have faith that the Bible is true and science (as evolutionists interpret it) is a lie? As for me and my house...


16 posted on 03/26/2014 12:39:17 PM PDT by afsnco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson