Posted on 03/20/2014 6:13:28 AM PDT by grundle
The police department at the University of California, Santa Barbara has released its official crime report concerning the professor who stole a graphic anti-abortion sign from two abortion protesters, then seemingly assaulted one of the protesters (a 16-year-old girl) and destroyed the sign.
The professor is Mireille Miller-Young. She is several months pregnant.
A large swath at the beginning of the report is redacted for reasons that are unclear. A few administrative bits are redacted at other points. However, most of the text remains uncensored.
In essence, Miller-Young told me that she felt triggered in a negative way by graphic images on the anti-abortion poster and on anti-abortion literature demonstrators handing out on Mar. 4, explains the report, obtained by the Santa Barbara Independent. (RELATED: Read the full report here)
The feminist studies professor who specializes in queer theory and pornography said she felt the protesters had no right to be on the UC Santa Barbara campus because the poster was upsetting to her and other students.
The demonstrators, Thrin Short, 16, and her 21-year-old sister, Joan, were standing in a designated free speech zone on the campus. They are members of a Riverside, Calif.-based pro-life group called Survivors of the Abortion Holocaust.
Miller-Young said that she and others began demanding that the images be taken down, the police report relates. Miller-Young said that the demonstrators refused. At which point, Miller-Young said that she just grabbed it [the sign] from this girls hands.
Asked if there had been a struggle, Miller-Young stated, Im stronger so I was able to take the poster.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
“Feminist prof now claims MORAL RIGHT to attack 16-year-old abortion foe, destroy sign”
Hmmmm... so, was the ‘Professor’ wearing a swastika?
Yes, the definition of 'free speech' is 'speech that's acceptable as long as it doesn't upset someone in a positron of authority'...LOL - is that totalitarian or what?
I suspect the only issue left liberals believe in is 'abortion'.
More likely she’s HAD an abortion and freaked out when confronted with the reality of MURDER.
Just like any other religious fanatic, when presented with the truth, they go off the deep end...
Abortion is a RELIGION to these people....
Their god is molech...
The Left rejects the concept of morality, but then claim to be morally superior. Their unquestioned assumption of moral superiority is what makes them willing to attack and destroy those that oppose them.
Might makes right.
I'm good with that.
Just remember, folks, this idiotess is a “professor”.
Think of the standards (or should I say lack thereof) of the joke of a university that hired her.
Face it...she is a bimbo with Obama-level IQ and morals who’d be fired from a waitress job.
Anyone who has “credits” from her classes has thrown their money into the street and taken a bodacious Obama on it.
Had to be inseminated by a turkey-baster.
It’s what fascists do.
“You are correct.
My mistake.
I recalled the saying incorrectly.”
No problem. The concept is the same and that is what’s important.
Not that additional evidence is needed, but it does support Rushs' theorem that 'The world is ruled by the aggressive use of force'.
Someplace near Santa Barbara is a man who deserves our respect!
Wow!
He’s braver than I!
That is the fundamental flaw/evil of leftist/Marxist thinking:
The “moral” righteousness of the leftist elites is so much greater than non-elitist individuals, they have the “right” to deny basic rights to anyone of their choosing.
There is nothing new under the sun. These people are neither ultra-intelligent nor morally superior . . . they are simply evil and we have seen their kind many times before.
Watch out for the word ‘triggered’ in media. This is the newest assault on speech. In fem-bot, lib-bot language it means that certain images or certain words can ‘trigger’ a psychotic event, depression or even suicide in another.
This will soon be used to used to goad government to curtail certain speech, actions, printed text, video, movies, etc. Watch for it in a court case soon.
This professor is upset and triggered by the suggestion that her baby is human. I think she should be flattered that her baby is considered human even if we question whether she is human.
Im stronger so I was able to take the poster.
Might makes right. The foundation of abortion in the first place ... so at least she is consistent.
Un-believable
A queer studies professor. I wonder if the child will have a dad. I doubt it.
They reject the concept of objective (God’s) morality - ie, morality outside of their own personal definition.
Their ideology was founded with this lie:
“you will be as gods, knowing good and evil”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.