Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CA Gun Store Owner Refuses to Give Feds Customer List (ATF Seeks Buyers of AR-15 Lower Receivers)
Fox 5 San Diego ^ | March 12, 2014 | Misha DiBono

Posted on 03/13/2014 7:42:46 PM PDT by DogByte6RER

AR 15 lower receiver photo: Assembled Lower Receiver AR_Build_01_001.jpg

Gun store owner refuses to give feds customer list

OCEANSIDE, Calif. – The owner of an Oceanside store that sells various gun parts to build a rifle from scratch refused to turn over his customer list to federal agents.

Dimitrios Karras, owner of Ares Armor, said the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives agents were investigating their business, not for what they sell, but for the people who purchase their products.

Karras said the ATF threatened to shutter their business if they didn’t hand over the names of 5,000 customers who have purchased an 80 percent lower receiver (the base) for building an AR-15.

It is legal to build a rifle from scratch without serial numbers only if the base is manufactured to ATF specifications. The base is not considered a firearm if it’s sold separately.

(Excerpt) Read more at fox5sandiego.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: 80percentlower; ar15; aresarmor; atf; banglist; eparmory; gunsandammo; lowerreceiver; oceanside; privacy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last
custom ar 15 photo: m4 A4.gif PING for custom AR 15s
1 posted on 03/13/2014 7:42:46 PM PDT by DogByte6RER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

“It is legal to build a rifle from scratch without serial numbers only if the base is manufactured to ATF specifications. The base is not considered a firearm if it’s sold separately.”

Bad reporting.

An 80% lower is a hunk of metal that is worked to be almost an AR-15. It requires a bit more work and is considered a homemade firearm which means it can never be sold, only willed.

Short but way more accurate than that blurb.


2 posted on 03/13/2014 7:54:01 PM PDT by Bogey78O (We had a good run. Coulda been great still.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bogey78O

Do the full auto rules still aplly?


3 posted on 03/13/2014 7:56:57 PM PDT by RC one (Militarized law enforcement is just a nice way of saying martial law enforcement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RC one

“Do the full auto rules still aplly?”

That depends on where you live. There are conflicting court decisions.


4 posted on 03/13/2014 7:59:48 PM PDT by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RC one

NFA rules apply. All you’re doing by working the receiver is just making a non-transferable firearm that the gov’t doesn’t know anything about.

It looks like this is a classic case of gov’t over-reach after this- http://www.guns.com/2014/02/27/california-gun-parts-maker-assault-city-sign/

The city complains about their signage and suddenly the ATF shows up days later demanding things? Welcome to Obama’s America.


5 posted on 03/13/2014 8:00:27 PM PDT by Bogey78O (We had a good run. Coulda been great still.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

Pure thuggery by the ATF.


6 posted on 03/13/2014 8:01:55 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Haven't you lost enough freedoms? Support an end to the WOD now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

I’ll take one of each!


7 posted on 03/13/2014 8:02:47 PM PDT by Doomonyou (Let them eat Lead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

If it’s not a serialized firearm, how would there be any records of who bought what, especially if a person paid cash for it?


8 posted on 03/13/2014 8:06:59 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

They don’t give a damn about the receivers. They want the names for the database they are building in anticipation of the time when some of the American people say “enough”.

The Feds are pressuring the states to hand over their CCDW lists. Which they have no authority to ask for. Instructor in my CCDW class said they had been trying to get the names from Kentucky.

They are expecting some serious dissent and they are preparing to come down on the “non-compliant” citizens when it happens. This is not going to end well.


9 posted on 03/13/2014 8:12:07 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s ((If you can remember the 60s.....you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

“Karras’s attorney informed the ATF to pick up the receivers Wednesday morning at their Oceanside location, but the inventory was not the issue. The store owner said he will not comply with turning over their private client list.”

Karras’ attorney is his partner in the business. There is a 45 minute video about their dealings with the city of National City over their satellite business location signage. If they’ve sold 5,000 80% lowers, there are probably 200,000 80% lowers out there, because there are dozens of businesses selling them. I guess the ATF is trying to get the plastic one’s because they claim that they are not in reality 80%, but rather finished parts that have had some of the features plugged with another color of plastic.


10 posted on 03/13/2014 8:12:49 PM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s; All

Speaker John Boehner is shirking his Constitutional Duty by not issuing Articles of Impeachment for B. Hussein Obama.

Removal from Office by the US Senate can ONLY be accomplished AFTER a perp. is Impeached by the US House.

The House is the Police, and the Senate is the Judge and Jury.

First the House must Impeach the POS.

Then the Senate determines if the Impeached POS should be removed from office.

Most FReepers fall in the all or nothing camp and only want a clear path to removal.

Our Constitution makes it very clear: Impeach first by the House, and then have the Senate decide on Removal.

The objective is to punish all those who violate their sacred oaths to defend the US Constitution.

A bi-weekly Impeachment of B. Hussein Obama would be needed to punish him for all of his Constitutional violations over the last 5 years, but I will be satisfied with just one Impeachment.

Obama’s Removal from Office by the US Senate would be good for America, but Reid’s Senate has not yet demonstrated any interest in what is good for America.

Since the RINOs have control of the US House of Representatives in 2014, 2014 is the last year that we can be certain that Obama could be Impeached.

The RINOs assume that they will maintain control of the US House, but their usual desire to lose to Democrats is so strong, that their assumption may not be a valid one.

Impeach B. Hussein Soetoro-Obama in 2014, PERIOD.


11 posted on 03/13/2014 8:14:27 PM PDT by Graewoulf (Democrats' Obamacare Socialist Health Insur. Tax violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

“Pure thuggery by the ATF.” no, they wouldn’t do that, its for the children.


12 posted on 03/13/2014 8:16:17 PM PDT by ForYourChildren (Christian Education [ RomanRoadsMedia.com - a classical Christian approach to homeschool])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s

“They are expecting some serious dissent” I believe you are correct. Too bad they forget upon which this nation was founded - the shot heard round the world. When our government (King George) wanted to take away our guns, and we said no.


13 posted on 03/13/2014 8:16:17 PM PDT by ForYourChildren (Christian Education [ RomanRoadsMedia.com - a classical Christian approach to homeschool])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

Fully automatic is legal on the reservation -

ATF never bother`n the Mohawks cuz they know they will have another scalpin` war as they did few years back here and in Canada.

One law for Mohawks and other crap for us`n coz the Mohawks take no sht from nobody.

Their 1795 treaties are backed up by machine guns.-

Our 1789 constitution ditto.

.


14 posted on 03/13/2014 8:17:41 PM PDT by bunkerhill7 ("The Second Amendment has no limits on firepower"-NY State Senator Kathleen A. Marchione.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

They don’t care specifically which one that you bought.

They want the names so they can send them threatening letters saying that they purchased an illegal gun, they have proof, and if you don’t surrender it they will take you to jail.


15 posted on 03/13/2014 8:19:37 PM PDT by Bogey78O (We had a good run. Coulda been great still.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

-
http://aresarmor.com/store/
-
http://aresarmor.com/store/Item/TACMHL15
Our 80 Percent anodized AR-15 lower receiver
is our standard 80 AR-15 lower receiver
with mil-spec hard coat anodizing.
Buy 1-19: $90.00 Each
Buy 20-99: $82.00 Each
Buy 100+: $70.00 Each
Stock Info: 333 In Stock
-
http://aresarmor.com/store/NewsArticle/Temporary_Restraining_Order_Against_BATFE

TO: Whom It May Concern
FROM: Dimitrios Karras, CEO Ares Armor
SUBJ: Temporary Restraining Order Against BATFE
DATE: March 12, 2014

Sir or Ma’am,
Last week the BATFE Raided EP Armory based on a determination letter that had deemed the 80% Polymer product to be a firearm. The determination letter that the BATFE used to obtain warrants against EP Armory is based on incorrect information about the manufacturing process. The BATFE has been notified of their error and the incorrectness of their determination based on this error.

This week on Monday, March 10th the BATFE threatened to raid us even though they are fully aware that their determination letter is factually incorrect. They requested that we turn over a list of every customer that had purchased a polymer lower from us and turn over the remaining inventory that we have.

Our customer’s privacy is of the utmost importance to us. I cannot in good moral conscience turn over a list of names to the BATFE just because they unduly threaten us with an unjust raid based on information they KNOW TO BE FALSE!

For the time we are SAFE! We were granted a Temporary Restraining Order against the BATFE on March 11th. The following is the declaration that I made during the process of obtaining this TRO:

Declaration of Dimitrios Karras, CEO Ares Armor
In regards to the events surrounding Ares Armor’s interaction with EP Armory’s products and the threats made towards Ares Armor by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (BATFE.) The following declarations are true and correct to the best of my knowledge.

I, Dimitrios Karras, state:
1. During a meeting with the BATFE around the end of 2012 that was unrelated to EP Armory’s product, the Agent that was present very strongly requested that I turn over Ares Armor’s customer list. He intimidated me with the possibility of criminal charges if he was not satisfied. This was the first attempt the BATFE made to intimidate Ares Armor into turning over private customer information.

2. An 80% lower is an industry term for an unfinished receiver that is not considered to be a firearm.

3. EP Armory manufactures an 80% lower receiver made from polymer.

4. Ares Armor purchases and then resells many products one of which is the 80% Polymer Lowers that are made by EP Armory.

5. In the regular course of business I have seen many different 80% AR-15 receivers.

6. EP Armory’s product is no different than standard 80% receivers that are sold openly and that the BATFE has consistently determined to not be a firearm. EP Armory’s product is in compliance with previous BATFE Determinations and is not a firearm.

7. The BATFE has Raided EP Armory based on incorrect information about EP Armory’s manufacturing process. The determination letter written by the BATFE incorrectly classified the EP Armory product as a firearm based on faulty information. The BATFE was under the impression that EP Armory was making a firearm and then reverting back to the 80% stage by filling in the fire-control cavity. At no point during the manufacturing process by EP Armory is a weapon made and then reverted. The solid fire-control cavity is built first and the rest of the 80% casting is made around this “core” specifically so that their product at no time could be considered to be a firearm.

a. As can be seen in Exhibit 1-3. The BATFE has consistently determined that the machining operations that cannot be performed in order to not be considered a firearm are as follows:
1. Milling out of fire-control cavity.
2. Selector-lever hole drilled.
3. Cutting of trigger slot.
4. Drilling of trigger pin hole.
5. Drilling of hammer pin hole.

b. EP Armory’s product is consistent with the BATFE’s many previous determinations.

c. At no time during EP Armory’s manufacturing process are any of the aforementioned 5 operations in a state that could cause a reasonable person to believe that EP Armory’s product would be considered a firearm.

8. The BATFE has been appropriately informed of their mistake. However, even though they have no determination that is based on fact, they are knowingly using their fiction based determination to intimidate Ares Armor with threats in order to inappropriately gain access to information that is private and should be protected.

9. I received communication on or about 3/10/2014 from our legal counsel (Jason Davis) that the BATFE was in the process of obtaining a warrant against Ares Armor based on their incorrect determination of EP Armory’s Product. I was advised that the BATFE had offered to forego obtaining a warrant if Ares Armor was willing to:
a. Hand over all of EP Armory’s 80% Lowers.
b. Turn over Ares Armor customer’s private information to the BATFE.

In exchange for turning over our customer’s private information the BATFE said that they would not “raid” Ares Armor’s facilities and would not pursue “criminal” charges. This made me feel as if I was being extorted. I agreed to their terms in order to delay an impending and unjust raid against Ares Armor long enough to obtain legal protection under the law.

10. I have been unjustly threatened with raids and criminal charges in an attempt by the BATFE to obtain information that is private and protected. The BATFE has expressed interest in obtaining Ares Armor’s customer list in the past and is now attempting to strong-arm us with undue threats based on information they know to be incorrect.

11. I am now in constant fear for the safety of my employees, my customers and myself.

Executed March 10, 2014 Oceanside, CA
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Dimitrios Karras


16 posted on 03/13/2014 8:25:49 PM PDT by Repeal The 17th (We have met the enemy and he is us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

Ping


17 posted on 03/13/2014 8:28:52 PM PDT by HammerT (The Commonsense civil right of Armed Self-defense [CASD], its the law of the land.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

Democrat fascism in action.


18 posted on 03/13/2014 8:35:58 PM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bogey78O

It’s not an illegal gun.


19 posted on 03/13/2014 8:36:04 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

Our local gun shop told my husband during the last annual inspection they had a list of specific customers they were asking about.


20 posted on 03/13/2014 8:37:59 PM PDT by call meVeronica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson