Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Conservative Case for Marriage Equality and Zots
The Princeton Tory ^ | February 11, 2014 | Evan Draim

Posted on 03/13/2014 3:56:08 PM PDT by Aqua Buddhist

Within a few days, a federal district judge in my home-state of Virginia will likely rule on the constitutionality of the commonwealth’s Marshall-Newman Amendment, which only permits marriage between one man and one woman. Frankly, as a conservative Republican and as a Christian, I hope that the amendment is struck down.

Republicans value marriage so highly because it encourages people to live according to conservative values. For instance, by enabling two people to share resources, marriage makes couples more financially secure, thereby reducing their dependence on government. In addition, marriage binds people into permanent, monogamous relationships, enabling couples to more effectively raise children. Although gay couples cannot reproduce, today there exist multiple other ways for same-sex couples to acquire offspring, such as in-vitro fertilization or adoption (which is often cited by the pro-life movement as a viable alternative to abortion). Numerous studies have confirmed that gay parents are just as capable as heterosexual ones. The benefits of marriage exist regardless of a couple’s sexual orientation, and therefore conservatives have an interest in ensuring that as many couples as possible enter the institution, whether heterosexual or homosexual.

Due to the separation of church and state, Christian doctrine cannot explicitly guide any court opinion, but faith no doubt motivates many people’s core principles and underlying values. As Christians, we are taught to “love our neighbors as ourselves.” Since you most likely want the ability to gain the benefits of marriage for yourself and enter into an expression of commitment with the one whom you love, I believe it is inherently un-Christian to deny other adults that privilege. Also, we are all creatures of God- whether gay or straight- and God does not make mistakes. By denying certain individuals the ability to marry their loved ones, you are telling them that their relationship (and, by extension, their sexual orientation) is somehow inferior or “not as good” as your own. Not only does the government lack the authority to make or enforce such a claim, but by condemning someone’s God-given traits, that sentiment also criticizes the actions of their divine Creator.

Admittedly, marriage today is threatened- not by the gay couples trying to get INTO the institution, but rather by the straight couples opting OUT. Only 51% of Americans are married, compared with 72% in 1960. Luckily, same-sex partners can actually help save the institution of marriage by making it relevant again and reversing a downward trend in marriage rates. I hope my fellow Virginians will join me in supporting this necessary step to guarantee human rights and save the future of marriage for future generations.

Virginia should be for ALL lovers.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; Philosophy; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: 10micronmind; 2stupid2live; conservatism; equality; evandraim; homosexualagenda; marriage; retread; tardedsubject; ursulathevk; virginia; zot; zotbait
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-140 next last
To: Darksheare

Not much zombie chow in this one, if you take meaning.


101 posted on 03/13/2014 6:03:30 PM PDT by Slings and Arrows (Richard Warman censors free speech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

True, the way he came on, you would have thought that he was going to display some knowledge about libertarianism and politics or political history, or something, anything, instead he was just a guy with an attitude, that didn’t seem to know anything particular about anything.


102 posted on 03/13/2014 6:09:36 PM PDT by ansel12 ((Libertarianism offers the transitory concepts and dialogue to move from conservatism, to liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows

True.
This is his latest shtick.
He posted near the same exact thing last year.


103 posted on 03/13/2014 6:10:33 PM PDT by Darksheare (Try my coffee, first one's free..... Even robots will kill for it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Aqua Buddhist; humblegunner; darkwing104; 50mm; MestaMachine; Arrowhead1952; LUV W; Eaker; ...

So long, Aqua Buddhist (Posting History)
Hat Tip to Graybeard58 and ansel12
Homosexual agenda advocate violates FR posting terms and finds it has become a smoking pile of zotted ashes



Nothing of the homosexual agenda is welcome here



FReepmail TheOldLady to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list.

104 posted on 03/13/2014 6:10:41 PM PDT by TheOldLady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

What name did he use then?


105 posted on 03/13/2014 6:11:56 PM PDT by Slings and Arrows (Richard Warman censors free speech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Aqua Buddhist

If you think gay marriage promotes monogamy for them, think again, They don’t play by your heteronormative rules.


106 posted on 03/13/2014 6:13:31 PM PDT by Mr. Blond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows

Thread title was near the same too if memory serves.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2849890/posts
Here it is.

Oh, its probably dannyh again.


107 posted on 03/13/2014 6:14:31 PM PDT by Darksheare (Try my coffee, first one's free..... Even robots will kill for it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

He had to be a retread besides being foolish.


108 posted on 03/13/2014 6:18:22 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: TheOldLady

So....did he achieve ‘enlightningment”? ;)


109 posted on 03/13/2014 6:22:15 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

I seriously doubt it.


110 posted on 03/13/2014 6:26:46 PM PDT by TheOldLady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Aqua Buddhist
The point is that libertarian thought is a good conduit for educating misguided liberals.

and FR is a good place for idjoits like you to get the ZOT.


111 posted on 03/13/2014 6:27:23 PM PDT by Arrowhead1952 (The Second Amendment is NOT about the right to hunt. It IS a right to shoot tyrants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: TheOldLady

Really? En-LIGHTNING-ment?

I’d say he achieved it spectacularly! ;)


112 posted on 03/13/2014 6:28:35 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

He really was a lightweight idiot.

It sure seems like he went to a lot of trouble, when he didn’t even have anything much to say, he must be a really, really, young guy, or teen.


113 posted on 03/13/2014 6:29:59 PM PDT by ansel12 ((Libertarianism offers the transitory concepts and dialogue to move from conservatism, to liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Just the reconnaissance wing of the left testing the waters for the full scale push to come closer to the election.

I expect right wing and christian sites will get a lot of it this time around now that the fabulous have the courts on their side.


114 posted on 03/13/2014 6:35:39 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

I think that he was being careful because he was a retread. I’d lay money on him being here before.


115 posted on 03/13/2014 7:08:41 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

Timing’s right. Some people are slow learners.


116 posted on 03/13/2014 7:09:07 PM PDT by Slings and Arrows (Richard Warman censors free speech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

Probably at True Moo right now scribing about us fascists


117 posted on 03/13/2014 7:10:34 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Or KOS or DU or Think Progressive..............


118 posted on 03/13/2014 7:16:36 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

I think you would win that bet.


119 posted on 03/13/2014 7:32:26 PM PDT by ansel12 ((Libertarianism offers the transitory concepts and dialogue to move from conservatism, to liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

I feel sorry for them. Craving acceptance for a sin you struggle with is a heavy burden.


120 posted on 03/13/2014 7:37:07 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-140 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson