Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GIVE STATES VETO OVER ABUSIVE FEDERAL LAWS
http://www.petition2congress.com/14477/give-states-veto-over-abusive-federal-powers/ ^

Posted on 03/12/2014 9:31:29 AM PDT by VetoTheFed

GIVE STATES VETO OVER ABUSIVE FEDERAL POWERS

PETITION CONGRESS TO PROPOSE THIS AMENDMENT TO THE U.S. CONSTITUTION. IT WILL GIVE THE STATES A VETO ON OVERREACHING FEDERAL POWERS.

http://tinyurl.com/VetoTheFed


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: congress; constitution; nullification; petition
GIVE STATES VETO OVER ABUSIVE FEDERAL POWERS

PETITION CONGRESS TO PROPOSE THIS AMENDMENT TO THE U.S. CONSTITUTION. IT WILL GIVE THE STATES A VETO ON OVERREACHING FEDERAL POWERS.

http://tinyurl.com/VetoTheFed

1 posted on 03/12/2014 9:31:29 AM PDT by VetoTheFed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: VetoTheFed

Your first ever post on FR.

Hang on, noob...

Enjoy he ride.


2 posted on 03/12/2014 9:34:10 AM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo (Support Free Republic!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VetoTheFed

The states already have that. Its called the 10th ammendment.


3 posted on 03/12/2014 9:35:59 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VetoTheFed
How about something like:

" The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. "

4 posted on 03/12/2014 9:36:43 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VetoTheFed

That is what the Senate was for-— before it was given to the people.


5 posted on 03/12/2014 9:39:46 AM PDT by eccentric (a.k.a. baldwidow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VetoTheFed
Not necessary. There's this little thing called "interposition." Daniel Webster used it to argue against a potential federal military draft during the War of 1812.

So . . . you just signed up today and your screen name is "VetoTheFed." AND YOU TYPE IN ALL CAPS. You one of those Paulestinian "Jewish international bankers rule ze vorld" types?

6 posted on 03/12/2014 9:40:10 AM PDT by Zionist Conspirator (The Left: speaking power to truth since Shevirat HaKelim.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VetoTheFed
Great idea. Why didn't I think of that!?

Now, go ahead and join up with the Convention of States [fyi, already in-progress], and move the idea into reality.

7 posted on 03/12/2014 9:42:14 AM PDT by C210N (When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VetoTheFed

That’s what the Senate was supposed to be for. Let’s just repeal the 17th Amendment.


8 posted on 03/12/2014 9:50:38 AM PDT by Paine in the Neck (Socialism consumes EVERYTHING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VetoTheFed

Tenth Amendment:

“The powers not granted to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.”

It’s time for states to assert their rights.


9 posted on 03/12/2014 9:55:41 AM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VetoTheFed

The 10th Amendment should suffice, what we NEED to do is impeach judges that overstep their judicial bounds in rulings..


10 posted on 03/12/2014 10:06:15 AM PDT by JSDude1 (Defeat Hagan, elect a Constutional Conservative: Dr. Greg Brannon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VetoTheFed

Asking fed gov nicely to relenquish their ill gotten power and to get it back will not work....

We will have to Article V the thing down their throats from a state level...


11 posted on 03/12/2014 10:08:23 AM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VetoTheFed; All
While I appreciate the idea behind the proposed amendment, please consider the following. The real problem with the unconstitutionally big federal government, as I've ranted elsewhere on this message board, is that parents are not making sure that their children are being taught about the federal government's constitutionally limited powers.

In other words, the corrupt federal government has been able to get away with making laws that it has no constitutional authority to make because voters are clueless that the states have never delegated to the feds, via the Constitution the specific power to make such laws.

Amendments to the Constitution that I would support are a repeal of the 16th and 17th Amendments. I also strongly recommend adding new amendments based on the following.

As opposed to the PC idea of a balanced budget amendment, I would like to see an amendment which enumerates Justice John Marshall's official clarification of Congress's limited power to lay taxes.

“Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States.” —Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.

The bottom line concerning such an amendment is this. If voters put an end to the tsunami of constitutionally indefensible federal taxes going to DC, then crook politicians would lose interest in getting themselves elected to Congress and the Oval Office in the first place.

I would also like to see an amendment which enumerates proposals for the long-proposed, long-ignored Enumerated Powers Act amended to the Constitution. Conservative congressmen have pushed this act to force Congress to police itself (yeah right) with respect to complying with its constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers.

Such an amendment would require Congress to reference specific constitutional clauses in all laws that they make to prove constitutional authority to make the law in the first place.

12 posted on 03/12/2014 10:55:03 AM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1
<>The 10th Amendment should suffice,<>

In a perfect world, sure. The framers knew differently and designed a government that accounts for man's disposition to accumulate power.

13 posted on 03/12/2014 10:55:50 AM PDT by Jacquerie (A senate of the states will not seat judges hostile to the tenth amendment. Article V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe

That alone is enough to toss Obamacare into the trash if it were to be upheld.


14 posted on 03/12/2014 3:32:12 PM PDT by maxwellsmart_agent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson