Posted on 03/08/2014 7:52:17 PM PST by teg_76
Rand Paul is slightly ahead of Ted Cruz....and most of us know that Rand, through his endorsement of Mitch McConnell, has already sold us out. Go Ted!!!!!!
Where did you get that idea? I am pro life and oppose the homosexual agenda.
From what you posted to me, post 228.
It was a weird post.
“” I support most of the social conservative agenda. I’d just be reluctant to use the force of law to impose it. With the exception of life, abortion as a form of birth control is murder. Male on male sex is a perversion. Other then those two I lean libertarian.””
You don’t like abortion and you don’t want men having sex with each, and you support the left by trying to end conservatives as a political force fighting the left on abortion the homosexual agenda, and the rest of the libertarian agenda.
Do you even know that your political activism at the moment, is trying to end conservative political opposition to the left/libertarian politics on abortion and gay marriage, gays in the military, drugs, prostitution, the whole left wing agenda?
Ted Cruz is American and qualified for the presidency.
You think this might be a retread?
That is mogi’s sign up, and one and only post.
He is obviously a troll.
Ansell why don’t you read a book or take a class on debate skills? Your just awfull at it. All you do is smear,lie and build fake strawmen. ...or maybe a class or book won’t help. It’s what you are as a person.
But I am correct, you are definitely not a social conservative, definitely an early and aggressive, and consistent promoter of the pro-abortion, pro-gay, anti-gun Giuliani.
You were supporting gay marriage at least since 2006.
You clearly despise conservatives, and are probably the most leftist, anti-conservative freeper here.
And today as you look around, you see Paul as being the guy who best represents your politics.
While you are trying to derail Senator Cruz.
This isn’t a debate site, it is a conservative site.
mogi67 is already zotted.
For someone who is unable to spell, punctuate or use proper grammar, that’s quite an indictment.
I’m not sure mogi67 was zotted, his single post was removed, but his account may still exist, I can’t tell when I do search.
Not very important, but I didn’t want to be inaccurate.
Well my eye surgery is scheduled for April so that will help with my typing skills. That said even with bad eyes I can still see when someone maligns me or other folks.
Imho, you owe him an apology.
Anything you want to dispute and request the posts verifying it, just mention it, and I will show how completely accurate post 269 is.
Judging by your liberalism revealed in your posting history, you are probably our most hard left freeper.
It is revealing that you support Paul and are hostile to Cruz, it vindicates our suspicions of Paul, and our trust in Cruz’s conservatism.
Exactly, and especially the laws about building a fence, controlling access across the border, controlling access via our coasts, and those laws about monitoring and enforcing the conditions of our visas.
The truth is that if we got effective control of illegal entry (no one will ever get perfect control), then time would take care of those already illegally in the country. They would be e-verified, or maybe even they would grow old and go on to their reward, but they wouldn't be replaced.
Those here would slowly decrease due to attrition.
That's why we don't NEED any new laws.
I spoke with a friend tonight, recently retired CEO of two very large American corporations in his day, and he was solidly on the side of the Chamber of Commerce. He said, "There are 15-20 million illegals holding down jobs in America today. If you just up and ID'd and deported those the economy would collapse." Additionally, he was absolutely certain that there are jobs that so few Americans will not do that we must have Hispanics to do them.
"If that's true," I said, "then what justification is there for having the illegal Hispanic do that job ahead of one who is trying lawfully to get into the country by waiting in line for his turn?"
I’ve searched a few hundred comments in this thread and did not see Blackirish bashing Cruz. Could you please point out where he did? thanks.
I’ve criticized Cruz on his tactics in shutting down the government. I believe Obama and Valerie Jarrett were hoping he’d do that.
Why not look at the reason he jumped on the thread, his very first post?
Shouldn’t you have actually looked at his posts before asking the question?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.