Drudge Report Republican Presidential Poll on Front Page (Ted Cruz needs your help!)

drudge report ^

[SoConPubbie]

Those links are from various news sites and somewhat outdated.

The quote I posted is from Rand’s web site and I assume it is his current stance on the issue.

Point me to the links where Rand Paul disavows his Immigration plan.

Hint: You won't find them.

[HiTech RedNeck]

Well wouldn’t it be true that a more libertarian America would do more to reward merit and less to reward leeching?

That’s one way to fight the illegale problem. Make yourself not such a doggone honey pot.

[bondserv]

"Immigrants should meet the current requirements, which should be enforced and updated."

Which is consistant with what P-Marlowe quoted Paul saying: "(CNSNews.com) - In his prepared text for a speech he is delivering today at the National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference and Latino Partnership for Conservative Principles, Sen. Rand Paul (R.-Ky.) said to illegal aliens who want to live and work in the United States: “[W]e will find a place for you.”

Paul also said he envisions today’s illegal aliens becoming additional “taxpayers.”

“Imagine 12 million people who are already here coming out of the shadows to become new taxpayers,” said Paul.

1st Cruz/Palin or 2nd Palin/Cruz

Palin's speech at CPAC2014 was a Barn Burner, and Cruz's was totally on conservative point!

[Dead Corpse]

You are confusing two completely different schemes. The Gang of Eight scheme was never Rands.

Who’s lying?

[Dead Corpse]

Ok. Let’s start rounding them all up. Who’s first?

Name names...

[SoConPubbie]

Well wouldn’t it be true that a more libertarian America would do more to reward merit and less to reward leeching?

That’s one way to fight the illegale problem. Make yourself not such a doggone honey pot.

I agree totally with small "l" libertarianism and small, limited-government that Ronald Reagan communicated so well, but disagree totally with the "L" Libertarian approach of Open borders, and a complete lack of any Social conservatism support.

And yes, for the most part, I agree with your post as I believe you are stating that removing the freebies would remove the attraction.

[Dead Corpse]

I’ve posted links directly to his stance. Instead of saying it’s things it isn’t like you are doing...

[SoConPubbie]

You are confusing two completely different schemes. The Gang of Eight scheme was never Rands.

Who’s lying?

Never stated that, on this thread or any other.

Rand has his own version though, of Amnesty. One that ends up at the same exact place that Rubio's ends up at, Giving 30 Million Undocumented Democrats the vote.

[SoConPubbie]

I’ve posted links directly to his stance. Instead of saying it’s things it isn’t like you are doing...

I've posted to you links that prove you completely wrong, in Rand Paul's own words.

It's not me saying misrepresenting Rand Paul's Immigration Plan, it's you lying about it not being Amnesty.

[Dead Corpse]

Nice. You HOPE someone commits a felony.

And I am in no measure pro-illegal. Quite the opposite if you’d bothered to ask...

[SoConPubbie]

Ok. Let’s start rounding them all up. Who’s first?

Name names...

Read Post #114 by P-Marlowe:

You make it impossible for them to get work and then you ask them to leave. In the interim, you cut off all government benefits.

Most of them will eventually self deport.

[Dead Corpse]

No. You posted a link to an article saying things about what he said.

[HiTech RedNeck]

I posit that “social conservatism support” would be there in small-l libertarianism, buttressed by a lot of private evangelism. Many causes that we take as social conservative today were actually incursions of government where it had long refrained — especially those that demonize items rather than their misuse.

[SoConPubbie]

Honesty isn’t a common trait among Paulites and libertarians.

You can say that again!

All you have to read is this thread and you have all the proof you need.

[jpsb]

"Immigrants should meet the current requirements, which should be enforced and updated. I realize that subsidizing something creates more of it, and do not think the taxpayer should be forced to pay for welfare, medical care and other expenses for illegal immigrants. Once the subsidies for illegal immigration are removed, the problem will likely become far less common.

[Blackirish]

Yeah lib tard troll...blah...blah..even Mike Lee is running away from the shutdown. His poll numbers were getting cratered by conservatives in Utah. Valerie Jarrett was grinning when Cruz threw the repubs on her bayonets.

[Dead Corpse]

A scheme I’d support.

And a good deal more as well.

Still doesn’t give us this list of “all of them” you say you have...

[Dead Corpse]

Petty. And, yet another logical fallacy.

Did none of you ever learn to really THINK?

[SoConPubbie]

I posit that “social conservatism support” would be there in small-l libertarianism, buttressed by a lot of private evangelism. Many causes that we take as social conservative today were actually incursions of government where it had long refrained — especially those that demonize items rather than their misuse.

I agree with the Private Evangelism and it is crucial to turning America around and if there is no Revival in America we are doomed.

However, I believe that if the founders had any inkling or foresight that the future citizens of this great nation would embark on protecting the evil of killing your own babies or the Abomination of Homosexual Marriage, they would included the necessary Amendments at that time to the Constitution.

They were Christian men and made it clear that this nation was meant for a Christian nation and would fail if it turned away from God.

[SoConPubbie]

A scheme I’d support.

And a good deal more as well.

Well, since we are on the same page, then Get Rand Paul to support that winning plan and quit suggesting we should "Normalize", Legalize, and provide Amnesty to these criminals.