To: HiTech RedNeck
Well wouldnt it be true that a more libertarian America would do more to reward merit and less to reward leeching?
Thats one way to fight the illegale problem. Make yourself not such a doggone honey pot.
I agree totally with small "l" libertarianism and small, limited-government that Ronald Reagan communicated so well, but disagree totally with the "L" Libertarian approach of Open borders, and a complete lack of any Social conservatism support.
And yes, for the most part, I agree with your post as I believe you are stating that removing the freebies would remove the attraction.
126 posted on
03/08/2014 9:43:57 PM PST by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: SoConPubbie
I posit that “social conservatism support” would be there in small-l libertarianism, buttressed by a lot of private evangelism. Many causes that we take as social conservative today were actually incursions of government where it had long refrained — especially those that demonize items rather than their misuse.
133 posted on
03/08/2014 9:48:42 PM PST by
HiTech RedNeck
(Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson