Skip to comments.
CommieCore Math
Posted on 03/01/2014 6:02:12 PM PST by dontreadthis
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: arth; commoncore; commoncoremath
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-138 next last
To: dontreadthis
Its reverse logic
32-12=x is the same as (12+x)=32
21
posted on
03/01/2014 6:32:51 PM PST
by
tophat9000
(Are we headed to a Cracker Slacker War?)
To: Fzob
It took me about 20 minutes to figure out how and why this process works Please enlighten us, because I don't see it.
To: Fzob
i get it too... but this is the kind of stuff i would do with my kids (my sons) for fun—aside from the school work... we are homeschoolers, btw...
23
posted on
03/01/2014 6:34:42 PM PST
by
latina4dubya
(when i have money i buy books... if i have anything left, i buy 6-inch heels and a bottle of wine...)
To: cripplecreek
this thing?
It's in Kindergarden. I had to google wtf it was the first time my daughter brought it home. I WISH I had time to homeschool :(
24
posted on
03/01/2014 6:36:12 PM PST
by
Domandred
(Fdisk, format, and reinstall the entire .gov system.)
To: dontreadthis
Wow ... subtraction through reverse construction. I absolutely pity the child making change for a twenty in the checkout line using this method. If this is real, this is child abuse on a level beyond physical or verbal. We'll need a new term to describe it.
25
posted on
03/01/2014 6:36:37 PM PST
by
so_real
( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
To: tophat9000
Yeah, but try to do that procedure in the store when you are trying to mentally calculate numbers.
26
posted on
03/01/2014 6:36:38 PM PST
by
metmom
(...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith....)
To: tophat9000
Can they just use an abacus?
27
posted on
03/01/2014 6:37:20 PM PST
by
funfan
To: latina4dubya
Okay. You, Quis, and Fzob need to explain it to the apparent mathematic pinheads like me.
To: dontreadthis
My 13-year-old Son does it like that, I think.
He does multiplication using, “lattices,” which looks somewhat similar.
I still don’t get it, though.
29
posted on
03/01/2014 6:38:34 PM PST
by
RandallFlagg
("I said I never had much use for one. Never said I didn't know how to use it." --Quigley)
To: Crazieman
LOL! I thought it might have been a new grading system.
A B L L-
30
posted on
03/01/2014 6:38:44 PM PST
by
funfan
To: dontreadthis
I've sat through quite a few math classes, including some at the post-graduate level.
I do not easily follow the "new" way.
Two words for new parents...
Private School.
31
posted on
03/01/2014 6:39:36 PM PST
by
Seaplaner
(Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
To: dontreadthis
I’d love to see their work on 12,368,279-7,856,234. It’s not going to be very sustainable though. It will take reams of paper to work out any thing,
32
posted on
03/01/2014 6:40:10 PM PST
by
Lurkina.n.Learnin
(This is not just stupid, we're talking Democrat stupid here.)
To: QuisCustodiet1776
It’s about as valid of a method as doing all calculus derivatives by using the limit formula.
33
posted on
03/01/2014 6:40:34 PM PST
by
Olog-hai
To: dontreadthis
How do the kids know “12 + 3 = 15”?
Shouldn’t it be
12 + 3 = ______
3 + 1 = 4
4 + 1 = 5
5 +1 = 6
6 + 1 = 7
7 + 1 = 8
8 + 1 = 9
9 +1 = 10
10 + 1 = 11
11 + 1 = 12
34
posted on
03/01/2014 6:41:11 PM PST
by
4Liberty
(Optimal institutions - optimal economy.)
To: funfan
Can they just use an abacus?
Trouble is, using an abacus would treat the problem like "the old fashioned" way.
35
posted on
03/01/2014 6:41:37 PM PST
by
plsvn
To: plsvn
36
posted on
03/01/2014 6:43:26 PM PST
by
funfan
To: dontreadthis
Closest I found to this online was the Common Core First Grade Math Standard for "Operations & Algebraic Thinking",
CCSS.Math.Content.1.OA.C.6 :
Add and subtract within 20, demonstrating fluency for addition and subtraction within 10. Use strategies such as counting on; making ten (e.g., 8 + 6 = 8 + 2 + 4 = 10 + 4 = 14); decomposing a number leading to a ten (e.g., 13 4 = 13 3 1 = 10 1 = 9); using the relationship between addition and subtraction (e.g., knowing that 8 + 4 = 12, one knows 12 8 = 4); and creating equivalent but easier or known sums (e.g., adding 6 + 7 by creating the known equivalent 6 + 6 + 1 = 12 + 1 = 13).
You can see it's the same type of thing. People do use this type of strategy when adding up golf scores, e.g. , looking for all the 5's or 6's, if there are a lot of them, and that kind of stuff. It does seem to be a confusing and anchorless approach, though.
37
posted on
03/01/2014 6:43:34 PM PST
by
dr_lew
To: dontreadthis
I'm becoming more and more convinced that all we have to do is find out who the recent investors into Kaplan, et al are. There's a scam here somewhere. I just haven't figured it out yet.
38
posted on
03/01/2014 6:44:20 PM PST
by
VanShuyten
("a shadow...draped nobly in the folds of a gorgeous eloquence.")
To: dontreadthis
its utterly insane.
forget sequential logic,,,get in line to be common cored...
39
posted on
03/01/2014 6:44:46 PM PST
by
MeshugeMikey
(how many times has obie fundamentaly transformed obamacare now?)
To: 4Liberty
Sorry, had to get a snack. Where were we.......
12 + 1 = 13
13 + 1 = 14
So,
14 + 1 = 15.
40
posted on
03/01/2014 6:46:06 PM PST
by
4Liberty
(Optimal institutions - optimal economy.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-138 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson