Posted on 02/10/2014 4:56:39 PM PST by FreeAtlanta
The pieces of the Benghazi puzzle are falling into place and the conclusions are damning: Americas intelligence community, our leading military commanders and then-Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta knew within fifteen minutes of the commencement of hostilities on Sept. 11, 2012 that the American compound in Libya was attacked by Al Qaida-affiliated terrorists. Yet, President Barack Obama and his then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton conspired to deceive the American people in order to protect their mutual power. They deliberately downplayed the role of Islamic terrorists. benghaziemail-300x225They did so in order to win a second presidential term for the Democratic Party and in an attempt to preserve the reputation of Mrs. Clinton for her possible run at the top office in 2016. Now, more than a year later, the truth is emerging with devastating clarity. A bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee report contains a key email, sent on Sept. 15, 2012, from the CIA station chief in Libya to then-CIA Deputy Director Michael Morell which states that the Benghazi attacks were not/not an escalation of protests. Mr. Morell received this information the day before then-Amb. Susan Rice delivered the infamous phony narrative on five Sunday talk shows: she said the violence occurred in a spontaneous manner due to protests against an anti-Muslim YouTube video.
(Excerpt) Read more at worldtribune.com ...
That’s an excellent point.
Another factor that I can’t believe people miss is that 0vomit admin officials keep repeating that there would not have been enough time to send a rescue party. How could they have known in advance how much time there would be? During an attack and/or hostage situation, you have no way of knowing when it will end. (Unless perhaps you planned it yourself.)
bump
The real communication of an attack is Priority One and goes out within SECONDS of an attack, must be sighed off on by all it is addressed to, recorded and logged. Such comms go directly to the President, SecDef, SecState personally, not to their offices.
Get that comm declassified and the cat will be officially out of the bag.
If you can find Hillary’s comments after Benghazi, listen closely to HOW she says what she say’s.
She places great meaning when she says “this government” had nothing to do with the video.
She also places great meaning on “we” when she said “we helped them”.
She was creating talking points for the left wing freaks to use in their defense and to blame Romney and the repubs.
Obama had attempted to create a version of the “spontaneous” lie with the airline plot just a few months before but the AP leaked info before he could.
Go back to 2010 and the attempted car bombing in NYC.
Prior to the attempted attack the left and their allies in the MSM went on a campaign claiming the TEA Party were a bunch of ultra violent, right wing extremist, racist, Tim McVeigh wannabes out to overthrow the govt.
After the attack the left jumped for joy and said their talking points about the TEA Party were correct because it was a fertilizer bomb just like Tim McVeigh used.
There is 1 of 4 possibilities for that attack.
1. The left orchestrated the news for the attack to blame it on TEA Party.
2. The terrorist are so in tune with the news the terrorist picked up on the lefts talking points and “spontaneously” planned an attack around them.
3. The TEA Party did it and the left was correct in their talking points.
4. It’s all just a big coincidence the terrorist attack matched the lefts talking points.
If the terrorist simply picked up on the lefts talking points and “spontaneously” planned an attack around it, you would need to go back check all the other attacks since 1993’s 1st WTC bombing to find out if it was possible the terrorist were picking up on the lefts talking points and planning attacks around them.
Is there a pattern to the lefts talking points and the terrorist attacks?
In fact there is.
Since 1993’s 1st WTC attack, prior to each and every terrorist attack, attempted attack, or threat of attack, the left has always ginned up civil unrest, attempted to gin up civil unrest, or had a plan to gin up civil unrest.
It never fails.
In fact every time the left drags up Rodney King in trying to gin up civil unrest, you can guarantee there is a terrorist attack coming.
Perfect example was Obama’s attempt at the “spontaneous” lie with the airline plot in 2012 which was derailed by the AP leak.
The terrorist gave the govt agent a bomb and told him it was his call to make WHEN the attack would take place.
The timing of announcing the threat of the attack was controlled by Obama.
Prior to it Obama sent people to Florida to gin up civil unrest with the Trayvon Martin case, described by the MSM as another Rodney King incident.
Obama controlled both ends, orchestrating the civil unrest and the timing of the attack, there is nothing spontaneous about it. The news was orchestrated for the attack.
In January 2006 the ACLU, with the help of Al Jazeera and Osama bin Laden making a tape threating an attack, attempted to create a version of the “spontaneous” lie by having the bin Laden tape released after the ACLU passed out video cameras in St Louise to get a repeat of a “Rodney King” type incident.
Problem is bin Laden made the tape before the ACLU passed out the video cameras.
The root of the “spontaneous lie” goes all the way back to the 1st WTC bombing.
The dems pushed Bush into sending troops into Somalia, then after the 1st WTC bombing claimed it was because Bush had sent troops into Somalia when in fact the plans for the attack started in 1991 the same time as the R King video.
An al Qaida doc. recovered in Afghanistan, a letter from Bin Laden to Mullah Omar listed as doc#AFGP-2002-600321 in the CTC at West Point Harmony Database(since disappeared from public viewing), bin Laden stated “the media is 90% of the PREPARATION for the battle”.
The news is being orchestrated for the attacks and the attacks are following the Weather Underground playbook.
Find an incident, a spark to ignite the flame, ratchet it up to a raging inferno.
Orchestrate civil unrest/race riots follow with terrorist attacks.
The only hope Hillary and her minions have to keep from being charged with treason, waging war against the US, mass murder is to try and make it appear as if the repubs are picking up on the dems talking points then collaborating with the terrorist to frame Hillary.
Classic cheap attorney trick.
Banghazi Ping #3.
Let Republicanprofessor know if you want on or off this ping list.
The kids love it. They hate to miss Greg. It teaches them to discern who’s BSing and who has an ulterior motive, unknown as it might be.
It lets them know what’s going on in the world.
When Dana goes onto a Hillary will be good, or Eric, the nice, but obviously whipped, finance expert goes on with Hillary was an outstanding Sec State, I just can’t take it.
Bob, I expect it from, and yesterday, when he and Greg had to be separated by Eric over Russia and communism, They asked a lot of questions, so it was a good history lesson.
But just ugh.
Dana has a huge infatuation with the Bush family. So...
Thanks for the ping.
Were they denied requests for help during the attack? he asked... .
[snip]
Well, we are finding out exactly what happened, the president again said. I can tell you, as Ive said over the last couple of months since this happened, the minute I found out what was happening, I gave three very clear directives. Number one, make sure that we are securing our personnel and doing whatever we need to. Number two, were going to investigate exactly what happened so that it doesnt happen again. Number three, find out who did this so we can bring them to justice. And I guarantee you that everyone in the state department, our military, the CIA, you name it, had number one priority making sure that people were safe. These were our folks and were going to find out exactly what happened, but what were also going to do it make sure that we are identifying those who carried out these terrible attacks.Everything he says is in past tense. He is cornered and has no teleprompter. I believe he was AWOL after the 6PM email that stated that the attack had stopped and the consulate cleared.
Number one, make sure that we are securing our personnel and doing whatever we need to.
So if the very first "order" was to do whatever we need to. Then why wasn't thank done? Who did he give that directive to? Why didn't he answer the question with "We couldn't get help there in time?" Or whatever the spin is now.
He had the Do Not Disturb sign on the bedroom door of Reggie because this was supposed to be hostage taking for a October negotiation for Stevens release to make him look good for November....
If that is true then it makes sense because no one could give the authority to launch an international cross border military action but the CIC so all they could do was tell them to stand down.
And I guarantee you that everyone in the state department, our military, the CIA, you name it, had number one priority making sure that people were safe. You lie!
Then we have Panneta's testimony where he cooberates Zippo's first directive and also the fact that he never saw Zippo after that.
Several committee Republicans pressed Panetta and Dempsey about their discussions with President Barack Obama on that fateful day and his level of involvement, suggesting that after the initial conversation the commander in chief was disengaged as Americans died.And further more why was Hillary out at 10:00PM to inform us that Stevens was dead and not Zippo, where was he? < /rhetorical >Panetta said he and Dempsey were meeting with Obama when they first learned of the Libya assault. He said the president told them to deploy forces as quickly as possible.
Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., questioned whether Panetta spoke again to Obama after that first meeting. The Pentagon chief said no but that the White House was in touch with military officials and aware of what was happening.
"During the eight-hour period, did he show any curiosity?" Graham asked.
Panetta said there was no question the president was concerned about American lives. Exasperated with Graham's interruptions, Panetta said forcefully, "The president is well-informed about what is going on; make no mistake about it."
At one point in the hearing, Graham asked Panetta if he knew what time Obama went to sleep that night. The Pentagon chief said he did not.
I believe Hillary said she talked to SCROTUS at about 10:00 PM. He was around. He did nothing.
I don’t think Zippo was around because this was Hillary’s operation and I don’t believe Zippo was supposed to be reelected.
I believe this was Hillary’s dirty trick to make it appear as if Romney and the republicans had collaborated with the terrorist to make Zippo look like Peanuts Carter II.
The dems paying tribute to Carter at their convention right before the attack I have a hard time believing was “Just a coincidence”. It was done for a reason.
I believe Stevens and others were supposed to be taken hostage, Zippo looses the election, Zippo then releases the Blind Turd Head in the turban with a promise of releasing Stevens and co. The terrorist break their promise and hold Stevens and co. until the day Romney is sworn in.
Hillary then has 4 years to run against Romney on “October Surprise II”.
Terrorist get weapons including surface to air missiles and it would be Romney’s fault every time one was used.
Actually, Zero and the Hildabest were watching the whole thing live from the overhead drone, having just ordered out for Chinese - since the take out pizza had been devoured by Lieon Pinhead in the first hour.
I can’t remember
that time in November
My mind’s in a blender,
it’s Jello, jellllooo, jellloooo
I once admired Dana now it appears that she is a fence riding appeaser.
You might be right.
You had a copy of that e-mail?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.