Posted on 02/10/2014 11:49:57 AM PST by SoFloFreeper
As a physician, it is my duty to assess behaviors for their impact on health and wellbeing. When something is beneficial, such as exercise, good nutrition, or adequate sleep, it is my duty to recommend it. Likewise, when something is harmful, such as smoking, overeating, alcohol or drug abuse, and homosexual sex, it is my duty to discourage it...
Back in the early 1980s, while working at Beth Israel Hospital, I vividly remember seeing healthy young gay men dying of a mysterious disease that researchers only later identified as a sexually transmitted disease — AIDS. Over the years, I've seen many patients with that diagnosis die...
Anal intercourse is the sine qua non of sex for many gay men. Yet human physiology makes it clear that the body was not designed to accommodate this activity. The rectum is significantly different from the vagina with regard to suitability for penetration by a penis. The vagina has natural lubricants and is supported by a network of muscles. It is composed of a mucus membrane with a multi-layer stratified squamous epithelium that allows it to endure friction without damage and to resist the immunological actions caused by semen and sperm. In comparison, the anus is a delicate mechanism of small muscles that comprise an "exit-only" passage. With repeated trauma, friction and stretching, the sphincter loses its tone and its ability to maintain a tight seal. Consequently, anal intercourse leads to leakage of fecal material that can easily become chronic.
The potential for injury is exacerbated by the fact that the intestine has only a single layer of cells separating it from highly vascular tissue, that is, blood. Therefore, any organisms that are introduced into the rectum have a much easier time establishing a foothold for infection than they would in a vagina.
(Excerpt) Read more at catholiceducation.org ...
Somehow, I don't think the media GENIUSES celebrating homosexuality KNOWS this information OR, if they DID know it, would DARE to put this information in their stories.
Did ya have to??
Phil Robertson said it briefly and bluntly.
Well, let’s get real: this fluffy talk in the media about “gay” really is false, isn’t it?
So perchance someone WILL happen to see this source, written by a medical doctor, and TAKE TO HEART the truth that is in the paper.
Meanwhile, 'gay' rights are being used to trash natural heterosexual marriage by including a sexual perversion as equal in law (and inferred social acceptance) as natural sexual relations that marriage legalizes and religion approves in that context (marriage).
Clearly we need to allow this subset of morality to donate blood to normal society.
“It seems like, to me, a vagina—as a man—would be more desirable than a man’s anus. That’s just me. I’m just thinking: There’s more there! She’s got more to offer. I mean, come on, dudes! You know what I’m saying? But hey, sin: It’s not logical, my man. It’s just not logical.”
Besides, liberals who call Phil's remarks "disgusting and vile" ought to bing the phrases "rimming" and "gay bowel syndrome".
Made a hugh mistake. Was trying to eat as I was reading this.
“It seems like, to me, a vagina—as a man—would be more desirable than a man’s anus. That’s just me. I’m just thinking: There’s more there! She’s got more to offer. I mean, come on, dudes! You know what I’m saying? But hey, sin: It’s not logical, my man. It’s just not logical.”
-Phil Robertson
The media love to show happy, adorable, funny, wholesome-looking gay couples in sitcoms and commercials. And viewers see this and say, “Oh, gays are so cute and nice! They just want to love each other! Who would be so mean as to not let them get married?” We’re not supposed to think about the information in this article. That’s why they got so mad at Phil Robertson. He dared to mention what gay men actually DO. And that disgusts normal people.
“Excellent article that explains, in medical detail, why homosexual behavior (anal sex) is very risky, at best. Most of the leftists that cheer for ‘gay rights’ either have no idea what they are encouraging or do know and don’t care because they want to support what they wish to believe are an ‘oppressed minority’, making the liberal supporter morally superior in their own eyes.”
So here the left is faced with ALL the HARD Scientific Data that the Scientific community can PROVE and yet the left is unwilling or unable to accept the inconvenient truth that anal sex is THE cause of so much disease in the gay community. But who really would expect them to understand REAL science when they are so willing to accept pop-tart science to defend their positions on globullwarming.
Funny how Robertson’s brief description of what homosexual males actually do is considered a “stereotype.” Kinda like saying that water is wet is a stereotype.
The same medical advice is applicable to females that engage in anal intercourse with their male partners.
Yep.
How anyone can engage in sodomy is beyond me.
That is vey series.
Gays have their own doctors who emphatically state the exact opposite. They aren't going to listen to this kind of article.
Or, um, other science that, in the final analysis, tells them that they are mere products of random chance...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
