If that will keep the loony (w)itches busy, have at it.
Correction. Its poorly written because its feminazi garbage.
satire ???
Naturally, the unwashed Lefties at ut in Austin would be involved. It’s pitiful to see this irrelevant group having to rewrite history to make themselves feel better about their maladjusted lives.
Is this for real?
In a civilized culture, women with these type of issues would be institutionalized for their own safety and be administered thorazine on a regular basis.
And all these womyn came to the defense of Sarah Palin during her very public unjust pilloring, right?
as usual it is the “seriousness of the charge”. Evidence is not needed.
Perhaps this is the reason why she’s so pissed:
In January 2014, the Wikimedia Foundation announced that Stierch was “no longer an employee of the Wikimedia Foundation”, after evidence was presented on a Wikimedia mailing list that she had “been editing Wikipedia on behalf of paying clients” – a practice the Wikimedia Foundation said was “frowned upon by many in the editing community and by the Wikimedia Foundation”,[1] and which Wikimedia Foundation executive director Sue Gardner describes as a “black hat practice”.[1]
Well, they finally got their own mag with a perfect name.
That's code for "it is logically organized (even if much of it is logically organized garbage)."
It is so pathetic. Once, early American communities were shamed for persecuting “witches”. Now, parents spend big money at large institutions to turn their girls into witches.
Shows how ridiculous and stupid feminists are.
“...Well-educated white males have been writing history and the story of the world since ancient times...”
But, let’s not give them credit for it...instead, let’s vilify them.
There are problems with the editors of Wikipedia. It went from being an open system of writing and editing to being controlled by unemployed people in their parents’ basement, fighting over turf. Ridiculous! I doubt it has anything to do with sex or gender, though. (Although, I’m sure Pajama Boy is an enthusiastic editor at Wikipedia.)
I created two pages years ago. I have been systematically squeezed out by weirdos who even questioned the veracity of a photograph I put up on an actor’s page given to me by the actor himself. A lot of jerks over at that site.
Why don’t they just start Femipedia? I’m sure it will be much much better. They can even declare it a valid source for school and college papers.
colleges are obviously VERY over-staffed ... and with people of very little intellect or imagination...
(why tuition is so high and so many graduates illiterate?)
OK. I am a female. I admit it. I do not think the website is either masculine or feminine. It is laid out in a nice, clean looking way.
These so-called feminists are nuttier than fruitcakes.
I wouldn’t be so quick to judge on this one. I count dozens of he’s and him’s in the George Washington entry, but very few female pronouns. The feminists may have a point this time.