Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: grundle
“It’s aesthetically very masculine in its design,” . . .

That's code for "it is logically organized (even if much of it is logically organized garbage)."

12 posted on 02/04/2014 6:46:19 AM PST by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Vigilanteman

<“It’s aesthetically very masculine in its design,” . . .

<That’s code for “it is logically organized (even if much of it is logically organized garbage).”

No kidding. When I saw the title, I thought, what do they want to change; it’s organized very well and the pages are clear and easy to read. I wish these leftists would stop acting like they are talking for all women.

btw - I’m a black female w/a PhD in information science. I have no problem reading or navigating Wikipedia. When I seek info on women, it is there, so I don’t see how they can say the design is masculine or that it leans masculine in its coverage (there may be more men covered, I don’t know their stats, I just know I don’t have a problem finding in about women on it).

I started out in human-computer interaction at the masters’ level and teach website evaluation at the grad level. I know a little about website design and think these women are full of garbage. Is it possible for leftists to go one day without complaining about something?


23 posted on 02/04/2014 8:04:46 AM PST by radiohead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson