That's code for "it is logically organized (even if much of it is logically organized garbage)."
<Its aesthetically very masculine in its design, . . .
<That’s code for “it is logically organized (even if much of it is logically organized garbage).”
No kidding. When I saw the title, I thought, what do they want to change; it’s organized very well and the pages are clear and easy to read. I wish these leftists would stop acting like they are talking for all women.
btw - I’m a black female w/a PhD in information science. I have no problem reading or navigating Wikipedia. When I seek info on women, it is there, so I don’t see how they can say the design is masculine or that it leans masculine in its coverage (there may be more men covered, I don’t know their stats, I just know I don’t have a problem finding in about women on it).
I started out in human-computer interaction at the masters’ level and teach website evaluation at the grad level. I know a little about website design and think these women are full of garbage. Is it possible for leftists to go one day without complaining about something?