Posted on 02/03/2014 10:35:02 AM PST by carlo3b
I FINALLY BELIEVE, IT IS THE WOMANS SOLE RIGHT TO CHOOSE..
For me, it came down to a matter of nature, and fairness. I thought it through, and in doing so, I made sure that I really thought it all the way through..
After all of my many years of standing on the sidelines and observing, as was what I have been instructed to do, as a man, I have concluded that it should be the ultimate decision of the woman to decide whether she should be a mother..
In balancing, deliberating, and reasoning, there was but one undeniable truth, if it was the genius of our reproductive system, and the female of our species was chosen by design, biologically, to bear the burden of child creation, she alone should carry the decision of whether she wishes to reproduce. As such, she alone carries the burden of who should be the sperm donor, where and when the reproductive act should transpire. FAIR, and EQUITABLE, RIGHT?
We all know, or at least we should take a great deal more into consideration before and after making that decision, about how important it is in choosing to have a child or children, how that child will be raised. But one step at a time..
Can we agree that the choice of becoming a mother carries more than a simple yes or no. Far be it for me to interfere with the dynamics that should be considered in a womans priority process, but the requirements in that decision, by nature and necessity, is how and why to choose the potential male donor, for a milieu of reasons. By carrying the SOLE access to the starting point of reproduction, also carries the sole responsibility for the results of that decision, the wellbeing of the resulting baby..
Assuming we are all on the same page, the donor (THE MALE OF THE SPECIES) has a limited, but vitally important contribution in the process, the seed, or sperm. The donor, has decisions to make as well, first and foremost, does he agree with her choice of him as the contributor, and her choice of where and when, and even in some cases, with all of the new technologies, how..
As a summary, how many choices are involved in the decision to reproduce for the woman; Do I want to reproduce, or will the act be for some other reason that I should take the risk? What are the criteria for choosing a potential mate, or participant? Who will be the contributor, or partner, for whatever reason? What planning, or precautions, if any, should be required before the act? When and where the act should take place? What will I do if the act has produced the intended results, a child? What if the planning went awry and there are unintended consequences? What if I become pregnant, who else should suffer the resulting consequences? Are there any limitations on my decisions? What if I didnt plan, what are my responsibilities? What is my last resort?
As we have outlined, there are a list of choices that a woman has with her reproductive activities, and natural tools to consider, all of which she has the ultimate choice to advance, or reject along the way. With all of these options, who should be responsible for her decisions, other than the one that made them?
So, since I had no choice, no rights to contribute to her decisions, and, unless I was the contributor to the act, leave me or anyone else that were forced out the resulting process, out f the problems, RIGHT?
GOOD LUCK, AND GOD BLESS
A man..
Women don’t have to choose to be mothers. AT least give the child life, and put it up for adoption. If one truly cannot bear the thought of raising and being responsible for the child ....do the right thing!! So many people out there are clamoring for babies.
This is double-talk and liberal-speak. I would never have expected it from you, Carlo. I can’t tell you how disappointed I am.
And now you’re gone and we can’t even have a conversation about how evil the stance you’ve decided to take is. You chose the slaying of babies over your years of membership here where the godless are rightfully called out as such for the horror they are willing to perpetrate on babies.
Oh, those d@amn inconvenient products of conception! They’ll foil your plans everytime! Thoughtless little things, aren’t they? /sarc
BTW, you never sent me the curry recipe you promised to send me (from the now-defunct Luau on Rodeo Drive).
The left has a lot of gimmicks and almost all of them involve telling men, conservatives, and all opposition they have no right to speak.
I agree. My wife and I adopted a boy 11 years ago.
It ended up being his opus. He gone.
guess I’ll have to read his responses that earned him a ZOT.
Gotta run for a few hours.
Did he reply?
aborticide is (homoCIDE) the intentional killing and removing of a fetus prior to natural birth.
They're the first ones to squeal like stick pigs when attempts are made to educate the public as to the nature of abortion and its consequences.
Looks like you were aborted. Dontcha just hate not getting a choice in the matter?
Women can choose to not spread their legs for a horny man. The horny man should expect to have to pay to play if the woman gets pregnent.
Women should never be allowed to murder. Ever. Period. No one should ever force a woman to murder their child either or be held responsible for that murder.
Your post is true and wise.
“LEAVE ME OUT OF THE PROCESS, AND THE CONSEQUENCES!”
So, you have no responsibility or control over your wang and the results of its use?
If you allow abortion at any stage, whether it is first or third trimester, then what about post natal?
At what point does it become a grotesque joke?
A parody of a thought?
I wish they would equalise the pressure in the airlock before opening the outer doors.
It’s like listening to a song backwards while hammered.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.