Posted on 01/19/2014 6:17:45 PM PST by markomalley
States are vowing to go to the courts for permission to ask newly registered voters to show proof of citizenship after a federal commission ruled late Friday that its up to the national government, not states, to decide what to include on registration forms.
Under the motor-voter law, federal officials distribute voter-registration forms in all of the states. Arizona, Kansas and Georgia all asked that those forms request proof of citizenship, but the federal Election Assistance Commission rejected that in a 46-page ruling released late Friday, just ahead of a court-imposed deadline.
The EAC said states can check drivers license databases or ask federal immigration authorities for information, but they cannot tell the federal government what to include on federal forms.
The EAC finds that granting the states requests would likely hinder eligible citizens from registering to vote in federal elections, undermining a core purpose of the NVRA, the commission said in its ruling, referring to the National Voter Registration Act, or motor-voter law.
But Kris Kobach, Kansas secretary of state, said the states will go back to the courts and said theres already a motion in front of U.S. District Judge Eric F. Melgren in Kansas to hear the case. Hes the same judge who set the deadline for the EACs ruling on Friday.
Indeed, the legal back-and-forth was in part spurred by a Supreme Court ruling last year, when the justices said Arizona couldnt refuse to accept the federal registration forms.
But Justice Antonin Scalia also specifically said states could ask the EAC to include the request on forms distributed in that state, and said if the EAC refused, the states could come back to the courts.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
Anyway, the various state standards were too varied to reconcile into a single, nationwide standard. That's why Article I § 2 was written as: The House of Representatives shall be composed of members chosen every second year by the People of the several States, and the electors in each State shall have the Qualifications requisite for Electors of the most numerous branch of the State Legislature.
Outside of gender and race amendments to the constitution, I don't understand where the uniparty in DC has any legitimate power at all to determine voter qualifications.
Part of the problem is that the States have become bigger versions of welfare babies and think they have to ask permission to exercise their Constitutional rights/responsibilities. If they can't get the Feds to put something on a form, they should add their own form and force the Feds to take action - not courts-orders, actual action...
I thought the “SC” already made it clear that states could NOT require proof of citizenship to vote.
Am I missing something here on our "civil rights" lesson...?
Thanks for the word on Hotze the Nazi.
You’re welcome. If you hear anything one way or another on Patrick or Staples, please share. TNX and have a great week.
go to the courts for permission
Permission? since when do states have to get permission from a court?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.