Skip to comments.
Navy Ordered to Drop LCS Fleet by 20 Ships
DoD Buzz ^
| January 16th
| Kris Osborn
Posted on 01/16/2014 9:11:06 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
To: sukhoi-30mki
Good.
The design is stupid on steroids to start with.
2
posted on
01/16/2014 9:12:39 AM PST
by
NVDave
To: NVDave
Agreed. It looks like they started with a Pontiac Aztek.
3
posted on
01/16/2014 9:14:39 AM PST
by
Dr. Sivana
(“The only thing that can save us is if Kerry wins the Nobel prize and leaves us alone.”-Moshe Yaal)
To: Jeff Head
4
posted on
01/16/2014 9:21:39 AM PST
by
Joe Brower
(The "American People" are no longer capable of self-governance.)
To: NVDave
LCS doesn’t have enough crew on board to do damage control and fight the ship at the same time.
They also can’t serve mess and do maintenance at the same time.
Undermanned. Under armored. Under armed.
What could possibly go wrong?
5
posted on
01/16/2014 9:26:29 AM PST
by
DariusBane
(Liberty and Risk. Flip sides of the same coin. So how much risk will YOU accept?)
To: DariusBane
What could go wrong?
Weapons makers don’t pass along the skim to congresscritters?
6
posted on
01/16/2014 9:28:27 AM PST
by
warchild9
To: NVDave
Agreed, it looks like the old Bismark. Not sure of how successful it is functionally.
7
posted on
01/16/2014 9:30:23 AM PST
by
Obadiah
(I Like Ted.)
To: sukhoi-30mki
And they will be replaced with?
8
posted on
01/16/2014 9:32:13 AM PST
by
blueunicorn6
("A crack shot and a good dancer")
To: blueunicorn6
We have 4 Battleships, and they can actually be useful. :)
9
posted on
01/16/2014 9:39:53 AM PST
by
Sporke
To: DariusBane
You are 100% correct on all points.
10
posted on
01/16/2014 9:40:29 AM PST
by
USNBandit
(sarcasm engaged at all times)
To: blueunicorn6
And they will be replaced with? Some other boondoggle to squander taxpayer money and pay kickbacks to those in the right spots.
11
posted on
01/16/2014 9:44:42 AM PST
by
from occupied ga
(Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
To: warchild9
This is a Navy specification. The boat builders are just filling orders.
Between every major conflict Navies ditch armor for speed. Once the Shiite hits the fan, armor goes back into fashion.
Rinse and repeat.
12
posted on
01/16/2014 9:47:34 AM PST
by
DariusBane
(Liberty and Risk. Flip sides of the same coin. So how much risk will YOU accept?)
To: sukhoi-30mki
I always thought that we should return to the practice where the enlisted men elect their own officers. The enlisted men and the officers should also decide what vehicles and equipment that they use. Its their lives that depend on it.
13
posted on
01/16/2014 9:54:32 AM PST
by
Count of Monte Fisto
(The foundation of modern society is the denial of reality.)
To: sukhoi-30mki
Nice speed boat. That’s about it. Build Jeff Head’s Mod Burke, instead.
14
posted on
01/16/2014 10:05:20 AM PST
by
ryan71
(The Partisans)
To: ryan71
15
posted on
01/16/2014 10:20:39 AM PST
by
Osage Orange
(I have strong feelings about gun control. If there's a gun around, I want to be controlling it.)
To: sukhoi-30mki
52 to 32
but the price will likely remain the same I bet
16
posted on
01/16/2014 10:28:53 AM PST
by
GeronL
(Extra Large Cheesy Over-Stuffed Hobbit)
To: Dr. Sivana
and finished with a pontiac aztek.
17
posted on
01/16/2014 10:34:57 AM PST
by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: NVDave
How will these things do in a serious seaway? They look like they will be very wet and that bow looks like a shovel
18
posted on
01/16/2014 11:43:37 AM PST
by
Jimmy Valentine
(DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
To: DariusBane
Well, the welds between the aluminum and steel on the thing could crack wide open.
When I read that they were going to weld aluminum and steel together, that was what made me dispense with any further support of the idea. There are some ideas that are just so stupid, no more information is necessary.
19
posted on
01/16/2014 12:22:14 PM PST
by
NVDave
To: NVDave
They are trying to save top weight. Galvanic corrosion is well understood and sacificial diods are necessary. This is done in pleasure yachts. I think the brits did it on type 42’s. But again they are virtually unarmored. Is that smart for a warship that is expected to dogfight with smaller craft and take on shore batteries?
20
posted on
01/16/2014 1:31:37 PM PST
by
DariusBane
(Liberty and Risk. Flip sides of the same coin. So how much risk will YOU accept?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson